Page 143 of 259
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 5:46 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns
randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 8:53 pm
The biden worshippers are getting awfully defensive and unrealistic these days. Probably because of the walls closing in on him revealing he's always been a fraud
VGR!
Joey Mannarino? Really?
The same guy who tweeted/Xd this the same day?
Joey is the guy you use for your GOTCHAs? Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 7:07 am
by Shirley
I feel dumber for having clicked on your link, Gutter.
You owe me.
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 10:16 am
by mjl2
zsn wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 12:38 am
mjl2 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 8:14 pm
I'm curious about the plan to pay for it
The same way we paid for Billionaires Welfare, also euphemistically known as a Tax Cut. I’m sure Booker’s proposal costs less than each of the last five of those scams.
Dems should just say that these tax credits “will pay for themselves” like the Republicans did for the millionaires tax cuts.
The tax cuts didn't pay for themselves obviously. I complained about those at least as much as anyone here. That doesn't excuse continuing to not pay for things.
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 10:23 am
by jfish26
mjl2 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 10:16 am
zsn wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 12:38 am
mjl2 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 8:14 pm
I'm curious about the plan to pay for it
The same way we paid for Billionaires Welfare, also euphemistically known as a Tax Cut. I’m sure Booker’s proposal costs less than each of the last five of those scams.
Dems should just say that these tax credits “will pay for themselves” like the Republicans did for the millionaires tax cuts.
The tax cuts didn't pay for themselves obviously. I complained about those at least as much as anyone here. That doesn't excuse continuing to not pay for things.
The fundamental issue is that everything is so byzantine and contingent that there really is NOT a clear relationship between revenue and expense; this isn't a household budget, where someone could say that if a spouse makes $50/hour, and the lawn takes the spouse an hour to mow, and a kid will mow the lawn for $35, then it makes more sense for the spouse to work the hour (and hire the kid for $35).
That's not how government works (and whether it
should work like that is an interesting, but academic, question).
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 2:02 pm
by jfish26
As the pubs say, selective prosecution, two tiered justice system, weaponization.
https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/sta ... PzNG4aOfKQ
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 3:07 pm
by DCHawk1
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 3:31 pm
by jfish26
Not seeing Tweets in-line is a huge drag.
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 3:53 pm
by randylahey
All this guy does is make shit up now lol
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 4:18 pm
by randylahey
jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 3:31 pm
Not seeing Tweets in-line is a huge drag.
We finally agree. What happened
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 5:45 pm
by DCHawk1
jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 3:31 pm
Not seeing Tweets in-line is a huge drag.
I'm guessing it's a temporary (or permanent) solution to the "bugginess" noted in the Off-Topic thread.
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 6:06 pm
by Sparko
So much better. X marks the rot.
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 6:52 pm
by randylahey
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 7:02 pm
by defixione
During his term as President of the United States, Donald Trump made tens of thousands of false or misleading claims. The Washington Post's fact-checker tallied the number of false or misleading claims as 30,573, an average of approximately 21 per day during his presidential term.[1][5][6][7] Separately, the Toronto Star tallied the number of false claims as 5,276 by June 2019, an average of 6.1 per day.[2] Commentators and fact-checkers have described the scale of his mendacity as "unprecedented" in American politics,[13] and the consistency of falsehoods a distinctive part of his business and political identities.[14] Scholarly analysis of Trump's tweets found "significant evidence" of an intent to deceive.[15]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_ ... nald_Trump
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 9:08 pm
by Shirley
defixione wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 7:02 pm
During his term as President of the United States, Donald Trump made tens of thousands of false or misleading claims. The Washington Post's fact-checker tallied the number of false or misleading claims as 30,573, an average of approximately 21 per day during his presidential term.[1][5][6][7] Separately, the Toronto Star tallied the number of false claims as 5,276 by June 2019, an average of 6.1 per day.[2] Commentators and fact-checkers have described the scale of his mendacity as "unprecedented" in American politics,[13] and the consistency of falsehoods a distinctive part of his business and political identities.[14] Scholarly analysis of Trump's tweets found "significant evidence" of an intent to deceive.[15]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_ ... nald_Trump
Randy's response.
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 10:15 pm
by Sparko
Biden did teach seminars at colleges in DELMAR and Philly.
https://www.statesman.com/story/news/po ... 555102002/
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 10:33 pm
by Shirley
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2023 6:07 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns
USA! USA! USA!
USA 2020 We had Mush Brain vs. Asshole.
USA 2024 As of this moment it's looking like we will have Mush Brain vs. Indicted Asshole.
USA 2028 I don't know if I will be alive but if I am, I sure as heck hope I/we have better choices. Heck, a Turd Sandwich vs. A Bar Of Soap would be better choices.
I am sitting here thinking how shameful it is that there can be no way any intelligent people in the DNC and the RNC truly feel these two clowns are the best choices to run our country - and the reality is they truly only care about which clown has the best chance to win the Presidency.
Even then, why would they think people would feel their candidate is better than the other candidate when their candidate sucks Gorilla balls?
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2023 6:57 am
by JKLivin
Sounds like a lying, dog-faced pony soldier to me.
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2023 6:59 am
by jfish26
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 6:07 am
USA! USA! USA!
USA 2020 We had Mush Brain vs. Asshole.
USA 2024 As of this moment it's looking like we will have Mush Brain vs. Indicted Asshole.
USA 2028 I don't know if I will be alive but if I am, I sure as heck hope I/we have better choices. Heck, a Turd Sandwich vs. A Bar Of Soap would be better choices.
I am sitting here thinking how shameful it is that there can be no way any intelligent people in the DNC and the RNC truly feel these two clowns are the best choices to run our country - and the reality is they truly only care about which clown has the best chance to win the Presidency.
Even then, why would they think people would feel their candidate is better than the other candidate when their candidate sucks Gorilla balls?
Calls a certain
South Park episode to mind.
Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2023 7:03 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns
jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 6:59 am
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 6:07 am
USA! USA! USA!
USA 2020 We had Mush Brain vs. Asshole.
USA 2024 As of this moment it's looking like we will have Mush Brain vs. Indicted Asshole.
USA 2028 I don't know if I will be alive but if I am, I sure as heck hope I/we have better choices. Heck, a Turd Sandwich vs. A Bar Of Soap would be better choices.
I am sitting here thinking how shameful it is that there can be no way any intelligent people in the DNC and the RNC truly feel these two clowns are the best choices to run our country - and the reality is they truly only care about which clown has the best chance to win the Presidency.
Even then, why would they think people would feel their candidate is better than the other candidate when their candidate sucks Gorilla balls?
Calls a certain
South Park episode to mind.
Notice how I didn't say a Giant Douche as an option? Foolish of me because if The Donald doesn't win in 2024, while highly doubtful, there is no guarantee he (a Giant Douche) wouldn't run in 2028.
