Page 17 of 60
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:15 pm
by Cascadia
TraditionKU wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 2:57 pm
i guess i shouldn’t be surprised, but it’s amazing how easy it is for someone to double down on their ignorant take in the face of indisputable contradictory evidence
It’s astonishing and a detriment to our society.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:23 pm
by twocoach
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 2:02 pm
i could walk into the mall right now, ask 10 people to share their thoughts on abortion. 8 of 10 would tell me they don't have any. they don't care. they are on their way to see santa, buy presents, and make gingerbread houses with their children.
1 person would go loony right. 1 person would go loony left. proof positive. case closed.
Nine of the 10 would simply tell you anything to get away from the loon asking them about abortion at the mall.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:46 pm
by jfish26
ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:02 pm
I like how mich seems to think
the world exists in in a Norman Rockwell painting or something.
Fixed.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:48 pm
by RainbowsandUnicorns
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 12:44 pm
abortion is a fringe issue. most don't give it much thought. most don't vote one way or the other because of it.
Ok, but enough may to make difference/s between who is elected and who isn't. Right?
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:54 pm
by ousdahl
jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:46 pm
ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:02 pm
I like how mich seems to think
the world exists in in a Norman Rockwell painting or something.
Fixed.
Well, it’s Mich’s world.
If it’s further than 3 inches from his own nose, it don’t exist.
(Btw Mich, your nose has frosting on it, prob from the gingerbread house)
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:14 pm
by RainbowsandUnicorns
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 1:53 pm
no one outside of the fringe right and the fringe left give abortion much thought at all.
this board focuses mostly on stuff that is for the fringes. that's what internet whackjobs do.
I have no malice towards you in asking you these 3 questions and I'm truly interested in your answers.
1. Forgetting on here. Do you feel a few/some/many/most/or all people who feel strongly about something and express it on the internet are "internet whack jobs"?
2. Of the following 3 things, what are you most fearful of?
a) Getting shot by someone with a gun.
b) Getting the fungus and having to be hospitalized because of it.
c) Assuming you're neither and you're a home owner, having Muslim and/or Black neighbors move in next door and directly across the street from you.
3. Have you ever used the word/s pro-abortion to describe someone that is "pro-choice"?
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:41 pm
by Deleted User 89
this oughta be good
(actually, never mind…you’re highly unlikely to get honest answers, if you get any answers at all)
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 5:51 pm
by jhawks99
Mich don't answer no questions.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 5:53 pm
by sdoyel
jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:46 pm
ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:02 pm
I like how mich seems to think
the world exists in in a Norman Rockwell painting or something.
Fixed.
Echoes Japhys post a few days ago.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 7:08 pm
by Leawood
As an older person, I can’t help thinking that the demonstrators advancing “women’s health care” including abortion services will never need abortion services.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 5:56 am
by Deleted User 863
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 1:53 pm
this board focuses mostly on stuff that is for the fringes. that's what internet whackjobs do.
For all the "owning the libs" talk that goes on here, it's quite ironic that this portion of the board is dedicated solely to "owning the pubs".
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:35 am
by Deleted User 89
BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 5:56 am
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 1:53 pm
this board focuses mostly on stuff that is for the fringes. that's what internet whackjobs do.
For all the "owning the libs" talk that goes on here, it's quite ironic that this portion of the board is dedicated solely to "owning the pubs".
how so?
wanting the SCOTUS to uphold a half a century precedence is owning the pubs?
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 8:10 am
by Cascadia
Illy trying to swim in deep end again should be fun.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 8:27 am
by Deleted User 863
TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:35 am
BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 5:56 am
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 1:53 pm
this board focuses mostly on stuff that is for the fringes. that's what internet whackjobs do.
For all the "owning the libs" talk that goes on here, it's quite ironic that this portion of the board is dedicated solely to "owning the pubs".
how so?
wanting the SCOTUS to uphold a half a century precedence is owning the pubs?
I didn't say this thread specifically. But a handful of you spend the majority of your time at kansascrimson.com attempting to "own the pubs" even though there are probably only 2 or 3 that even post/read this messageboard regularly.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 9:01 am
by Deleted User 89
BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 8:27 am
TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:35 am
BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 5:56 am
For all the "owning the libs" talk that goes on here, it's quite ironic that this portion of the board is dedicated solely to "owning the pubs".
how so?
wanting the SCOTUS to uphold a half a century precedence is owning the pubs?
I didn't say this thread specifically. But a handful of you spend the majority of your time at kansascrimson.com attempting to "own the pubs" even though there are probably only 2 or 3 that even post/read this messageboard regularly.
ok
lol
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:51 am
by Overlander
Cascadia wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 8:10 am
Illy trying to swim in deep end again should be fun.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:53 am
by Overlander
BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 8:27 am
TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:35 am
BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 03, 2021 5:56 am
For all the "owning the libs" talk that goes on here, it's quite ironic that this portion of the board is dedicated solely to "owning the pubs".
how so?
wanting the SCOTUS to uphold a half a century precedence is owning the pubs?
I didn't say this thread specifically. But a handful of you spend the majority of your time at kansascrimson.com attempting to "own the pubs" even though there are probably only 2 or 3 that even post/read this messageboard regularly.
With a board this lowly populated. 3 douchebags is still a fairly high number
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:54 am
by zsn
Pubs own themselves enough on their own, especially as they try to own the libs. So, it can’t be that hard.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:59 am
by Deleted User 89
if calling out the ignorant takes of people on this board = owning the pubs, then i guess i’m guilty as charged
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 9:55 am
by Cascadia
The trash and evil rulings begin. Dems either need to increase the seats or we hope justices die young.
Sorry ladies, white male amercians fucking suck.