Kansas Crimson

Weaponized tantrum killers. Maybe tantrum shooters is a better appellation.

Sparko wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:17 am Weaponized tantrum killers.

Do you know how much of an IMPROVEMENT it would be if psychos started using nearly anything as accessible/convenient as guns, that isn’t guns?

Miss me with the “if we further restrict guns, then all of these killers will become chemists skilled at making and distributing poison” nonsense.

Fish: absolutely. ( I keep revising and extending just as you post. Sorry)

If we further restrict guns, it means killers will still be killing, and regular people less able to defend themselves. That's all it changes

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:30 am

Did the sign prevent bank security from having guns? Nashville and Uvalde schools?

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:29 am If we further restrict guns, it means killers will still be killing, and regular people less able to defend themselves. That's all it changes

There is NO evidence supporting the notion that, at scale, more guns = safer.

None. None whatsoever. Zero, zilch, nada.

There’s lots of evidence to the contrary.

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:30 am

Theres been plenty of times where a good guy with a gun stopped a bad guy

I wonder if that LMG is legal?

How does it work out when there is a bad guy with a gun and all the good guys are unarmed?? Lol

That looks like a happy healthy family with a safe and secure household. Maybe instead of whining you should strive to be more like them

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:44 am How does it work out when there is a bad guy with a gun and all the good guys are unarmed?? Lol

Dunno, ask a bunch of dead kids and get back to me.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:47 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:44 am How does it work out when there is a bad guy with a gun and all the good guys are unarmed?? Lol

Dunno, ask a bunch of dead kids and get back to me.

Exactly. I bet they wish they were armed and allowed to defend themselves. Instead we put them in a gun free zone like easy targets for the mentally unstable

It's pretty obvious, from all of his posts, that Randy doesn't care about the dead kids. He wants the privilege of holstering his viagra.

Rainbows you don't own a gun correct? What would you do in the event of a home intruder? What would be your plan if someone broke into your house at night with ill intent

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:48 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:47 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:44 am How does it work out when there is a bad guy with a gun and all the good guys are unarmed?? Lol

Dunno, ask a bunch of dead kids and get back to me.

Exactly. I bet they wish they were armed and allowed to defend themselves. Instead we put them in a gun free zone like easy targets for the mentally unstable

“The armed adults couldn’t prevent it. The only solution is OBVIOUSLY to arm the children, too.”

defixione wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:49 am It's pretty obvious, from all of his posts, that Randy doesn't care about the dead kids. He wants the privilege of holstering his viagra.

I think you guys don't care about the dead kids. You are arguing so strongly against allowing them to defend themselves or be protected.

Found footage from Randy’s utopia:

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:51 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:48 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:47 am

Dunno, ask a bunch of dead kids and get back to me.

Exactly. I bet they wish they were armed and allowed to defend themselves. Instead we put them in a gun free zone like easy targets for the mentally unstable

“The armed adults couldn’t prevent it. The only solution is OBVIOUSLY to arm the children, too.”

Thats a really dumb statement. Everytime there is an active school shooter how do we stop it? We send in men with guns. And it does save lives