Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2022 1:31 pm
like jerry jones is the owner of the dallas cowboys franchise. no difference.
Do you feel that those companies won a national title or that the team representing the University of Kansas did?BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 01, 2022 1:27 pm1-800-gotjunktwocoach wrote: ↑Mon Aug 01, 2022 1:05 pmGood grief, that's just so ridiculous. Did Kansas win a national title last season or did whatever companies that granted NIL to various KU players win a national title? I can't even name a single company that gave NIL money to a KU player last year without looking it up. Can you?
Raisin canes
JWils
And many more.
I agree with pretty much everything Illy has said about this. Regardless, let's get this bullshit out of the sports boards.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 01, 2022 1:17 pm"Offensive"twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Aug 01, 2022 1:07 pmRegarding race does not mean "racist". Take that stupid crap to the Poli board.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 01, 2022 12:11 pm Oh really?
Un·cle Tom
/ˌəNGkəl ˈtäm/
noun
OFFENSIVE•NORTH AMERICAN
a black man considered to be excessively obedient or servile to white people.
a person regarded as betraying their cultural or social allegiance.
"he called moderates Uncle Toms"
A white person calling a black person an Uncle Tom is racially offensive and insensitive. Borderline racist.
Tell Q to take it to the poli board. Not me. I didn't call anyone an Uncle Tom.
Sorry that I don't get my messageboard giggles from casual racism or using racially offensive terms to describe a black person... and no clue why you're running to defend cascadia saying that uncle tom isn't a racial term when it is.
Speaking of ignoring things....probably should have taken some of your own advice and not jumped into this particular discussion/string of posts (since it had nothing to do with you or anything you said) in the first place.
I feel that the University of Kansas basketball team/players won a national title.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Aug 01, 2022 1:32 pmDo you feel that those companies won a national title or that the team representing the University of Kansas did?BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 01, 2022 1:27 pm1-800-gotjunktwocoach wrote: ↑Mon Aug 01, 2022 1:05 pm
Good grief, that's just so ridiculous. Did Kansas win a national title last season or did whatever companies that granted NIL to various KU players win a national title? I can't even name a single company that gave NIL money to a KU player last year without looking it up. Can you?
Raisin canes
JWils
And many more.
This sort of column is exactly the point of dragging things out as long as KU/Bill have.
Enough is enough. How long does it take to prove the Kansas Jayhawks basketball program cheated, as the NCAA enforcement staff has alleged, or clear the program of wrongdoing?
[...]
After nearly three years of back and forth with the NCAA and an independent resolution panel that will decide the appropriate penalties, the case has yet to be resolved.
Now that college players are allowed to make money from their name, image and likeness, it’s even more important to expedite this drawn out process. KU basketball is being held hostage by an outdated amateur model that was nearly unenforceable until the feds got involved.
[...]
In this space, I’ve been critical of Self’s plausible deniability regarding possible NCAA recruiting violations. But the holding pattern the Jayhawks program has faced is inexcusable.
KU’s case is being handled through the independent accountability resolutions process, which has no option for appeal. All punitive decisions are final. An independent panel will decide what penalties are appropriate.
But the sooner the five-member body gets around to announcing KU’s potential punishment, the better.
I certainly agree that KU has benefited from the NIl changes that have occurred and that the punishment they would have received had the case been completed two years ago would most likely have been much harsher than they will be once this finally comes to an end. But the only further gain I see from this dragging out longer is either a public outcry throughout the game that these cases have simply drug on for too long (which I don't see happening) or Congress forcing the ncaa's hands (unlikely but more likely than the public outcry).jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 01, 2022 4:15 pmThis sort of column is exactly the point of dragging things out as long as KU/Bill have.
Hey, NCAA, show your cards: If KU broke the rules, it’s time to reveal the punishment
https://www.kansascity.com/opinion/opn- ... 47006.html
Enough is enough. How long does it take to prove the Kansas Jayhawks basketball program cheated, as the NCAA enforcement staff has alleged, or clear the program of wrongdoing?
[...]
After nearly three years of back and forth with the NCAA and an independent resolution panel that will decide the appropriate penalties, the case has yet to be resolved.
Now that college players are allowed to make money from their name, image and likeness, it’s even more important to expedite this drawn out process. KU basketball is being held hostage by an outdated amateur model that was nearly unenforceable until the feds got involved.
[...]
In this space, I’ve been critical of Self’s plausible deniability regarding possible NCAA recruiting violations. But the holding pattern the Jayhawks program has faced is inexcusable.
KU’s case is being handled through the independent accountability resolutions process, which has no option for appeal. All punitive decisions are final. An independent panel will decide what penalties are appropriate.
But the sooner the five-member body gets around to announcing KU’s potential punishment, the better.
You can be (1) someone who knows what's popular and what isn't, or (2) someone who doesn't engage with the mainstream coverage of something, but you can't be both 1 and 2. You don't get to say you know which mayonnaise is good and which mayonnaise is bad, if you hate and do not consume mayonnaise.
is this 1,000 people at the mich’s mall?pdub wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 7:45 am I would be willing to bet all the kcrim bucks if you asked 1000 people who considered themselves cbb fans if they had heard of Chet Holmgren v Paige Buckers I’d give the edge to Chet.
I’d also say I have, on average, watched far more cbb than the average person, that includes random cbb.