Kansas Crimson

Come hang with my Catholic friends some time!

(Just don’t let em know we’re stoned, they look down their nose at that shit…we’ll have to be sneaky and chief it up in the parking lot before we go in or somethin…remember to bring Visine, and axe body spray…)

Why hang out with people you detest?

actually, they stopped hanging out with me.

Not sure if it was cuz of the weed habit, or hanging with lose wimmin, or maybe just I called bullshit on the whole dang thing.

Who knows!

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:28 am Come hang with my Catholic friends some time!

(Just don’t let em know we’re stoned, they look down their nose at that shit…we’ll have to be sneaky and chief it up in the parking lot before we go in or somethin…remember to bring Visine, and axe body spray…)

ever hear the one about how to keep mormons from drinking your beer and smoking your weed at parties?




make sure you invite more than one

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:14 am It's so funny to me that you equate being religious to being on the "right". It's almost like you don't realize exactly how religious the black and hispanic communities are which are largely groups who vote left.

Only one side is using it to form a good chunk of their platform's stances.

obvious to anyone paying attention

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:23 am I gotta call bullshit on that one. I don't believe ANYONE votes solely on abortion rights.

You'd be wrong.

twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:54 am

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:23 am I gotta call bullshit on that one. I don't believe ANYONE votes solely on abortion rights.

You'd be wrong.

There is definitely a portion of the GOP that votes solely on abortion rights

wasn’t abortion stance the primary measuring stick for trump’s SCOTUS appointees?

i’ll see if i can find the quotes, but i’m almost certain that religious folks in particular cited this issue as the reason they were able to hold their noses and cast a vote for trump...because he promised anti-Roe judges

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 10:31 am wasn’t abortion stance the primary measuring stick for trump’s SCOTUS appointees?

i’ll see if i can find the quotes, but i’m almost certain that religious folks in particular cited this issue as the reason they were able to hold their noses and cast a vote for trump...because he promised anti-Roe judges

It was something he ran on in his campaign:

https://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/19/trump-i ... -case.html

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/2 ... e-pro-life

and it is something at least some of his appointees have called for: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cory-wilso ... oe-v-wade/

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... e-n1241738

wow...such an easy thing to find

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/ ... 546103002/

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:23 am I gotta call bullshit on that one. I don't believe ANYONE votes solely on abortion rights.

So, you've never been south of I-70?

Heck, just go hang at the St. Lawrence Catholic Campus Center.



shit, nm, guess that’s south of 70 too

Abortion is obviously an important issue to many. Even the most important issue to some.

I still think if you find someone who says they vote solely on that issue that you could create a scenario where it doesn't hold true.

Like hey candidate A is a pro choice white republican, but candidate B is a pro life black democrat....then see how it plays out.


But hey, if there are lots of idiots voting solely on 1 issue NO MATTER WHAT the other factors are, then i unfortunately gave people too much credit.

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 2:55 pm i unfortunately gave people too much credit.

It's very easy to over correct.

People, by and large, are peoplish

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 2:55 pm
Like hey candidate A is a pro choice white republican, but candidate B is a pro life black democrat....then see how it plays out.

Opposite of “pro-choice” is NOT “pro-life”. The correct terms are “anti-choice” or “forced-birther”.

One can be simultaneously pro-choice AND pro-life (as I am).

zsn wrote: ↑Fri Jul 02, 2021 1:08 am

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 2:55 pm
Like hey candidate A is a pro choice white republican, but candidate B is a pro life black democrat....then see how it plays out.

Opposite of “pro-choice” is NOT “pro-life”. The correct terms are “anti-choice” or “forced-birther”.

One can be simultaneously pro-choice AND pro-life (as I am).

^^^^^

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Jul 02, 2021 6:56 am

zsn wrote: ↑Fri Jul 02, 2021 1:08 am

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 2:55 pm
Like hey candidate A is a pro choice white republican, but candidate B is a pro life black democrat....then see how it plays out.

Opposite of “pro-choice” is NOT “pro-life”. The correct terms are “anti-choice” or “forced-birther”.

One can be simultaneously pro-choice AND pro-life (as I am).

^^^^^

illy's brain can't compute

lots going on in this one

twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:54 am

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:23 am I gotta call bullshit on that one. I don't believe ANYONE votes solely on abortion rights.

You'd be wrong.

My brother, a proud Christian, admits that he was a one issue voter - abortion - for a decade.

Stem cell therapy has changed this stance.

And he wants Trump to die. So does his Pastor. They think it's the only way to heal the country.