Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:00 am
do they have academic eligibility requirements in semi-pro collegiate like athletics.
I'm with you.jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 9:31 amNo. And it also just does not matter. Was anyone else's KU experience ruined because I took a couple check-the-box classes outside my major pass/fail, and completely mailed it in? No. Nope.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:13 am He's not totally wrong. The high end players are not there to be students. At all.
Although, that's not something that was created with NIL.
Anyone who takes it personally that the basketball players aren't there for Western Civ II is absolutely choosing to be offended by it.
Next you'll tell me some students who take Western Civ only read the condensed summaries? My God. I wish I had a dime for every time Epictetus came up at work.jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 9:31 amNo. And it also just does not matter. Was anyone else's KU experience ruined because I took a couple check-the-box classes outside my major pass/fail, and completely mailed it in? No. Nope.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:13 am He's not totally wrong. The high end players are not there to be students. At all.
Although, that's not something that was created with NIL.
Anyone who takes it personally that the basketball players aren't there for Western Civ II is absolutely choosing to be offended by it.
unrelated but sure.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 9:51 amI showed up for a final in a math class and panicked that I might be in the wrong place because there were so many people there I had never seen before. There were clearly regular students who didn't take their schooling very seriously. The notion that the current academic situation is unique to today or to athletics is simply choosing to be ignorant.
It's almost like - and I do hope you're sitting down, this could be jarring - part of college for a great great many students is figuring out how to do the bare minimum to meet their academic responsibilities, so that they have the most time possible to do what really interests them.Sparko wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:50 amNext you'll tell me some students who take Western Civ only read the condensed summaries? My God. I wish I had a dime for every time Epictetus came up at work.jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 9:31 amNo. And it also just does not matter. Was anyone else's KU experience ruined because I took a couple check-the-box classes outside my major pass/fail, and completely mailed it in? No. Nope.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:13 am He's not totally wrong. The high end players are not there to be students. At all.
Although, that's not something that was created with NIL.
Anyone who takes it personally that the basketball players aren't there for Western Civ II is absolutely choosing to be offended by it.
I don't know about every school, but the P5's like KU, the student-athlete scholarships don't seem to come from the school's general fund, but rather from the for-profit athletic departments' raised funds.hoopla wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:04 pm agree, a college degree has long been more a matter of perseverance than intelligence.
as for earlier, i believe that the facade of tying academics to (otherwise entirely independent) athletic programs has a profound effect on everyone's college experience, as it plays a part in everything from outlandish tuition rates to disparate access to resources (which are in part funded by tuition) to the erosion of benefits for faculty (which itself leads to deterioration of the education we all paid for).
or maybe everything <i>is</i> just better than it was before, and this post belongs on a poli-board, lol. i digress.
Right - so the athletes are just like everyone else. Some care about the material. Some don’t. Some are driven to get great grades. Some aren’t.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:08 pm I had class with several KU athletes, the most memorable being Aqib Talib and Brandon Rush. Aqib showed up on the 1st day of class and for the final. Rush was an every 3rd class or so attendee. Granted, I don't recall these being attendance-required classes.
I had friends that were student-athletes for non-revenue sports. Great students, successful professionals now.
This was also 15-some years ago, so it could be way different now being a completely different department now. Wife has recently had cheerleaders at KU as students but no athletes. Also good students.
Yes.jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:14 pmRight - so the athletes are just like everyone else. Some care about the material. Some don’t. Some are driven to get great grades. Some aren’t.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:08 pm I had class with several KU athletes, the most memorable being Aqib Talib and Brandon Rush. Aqib showed up on the 1st day of class and for the final. Rush was an every 3rd class or so attendee. Granted, I don't recall these being attendance-required classes.
I had friends that were student-athletes for non-revenue sports. Great students, successful professionals now.
This was also 15-some years ago, so it could be way different now being a completely different department now. Wife has recently had cheerleaders at KU as students but no athletes. Also good students.
I'm at a smaller school now, but athletics are still a big deal.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:12 pmI don't know about every school, but the P5's like KU, the student-athlete scholarships don't seem to come from the school's general fund, but rather from the for-profit athletic departments' raised funds.hoopla wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:04 pm agree, a college degree has long been more a matter of perseverance than intelligence.
as for earlier, i believe that the facade of tying academics to (otherwise entirely independent) athletic programs has a profound effect on everyone's college experience, as it plays a part in everything from outlandish tuition rates to disparate access to resources (which are in part funded by tuition) to the erosion of benefits for faculty (which itself leads to deterioration of the education we all paid for).
or maybe everything <i>is</i> just better than it was before, and this post belongs on a poli-board, lol. i digress.
Same meeting, yikes. Just rip off that band-aid.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:20 pmI'm at a smaller school now, but athletics are still a big deal.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:12 pmI don't know about every school, but the P5's like KU, the student-athlete scholarships don't seem to come from the school's general fund, but rather from the for-profit athletic departments' raised funds.hoopla wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:04 pm agree, a college degree has long been more a matter of perseverance than intelligence.
as for earlier, i believe that the facade of tying academics to (otherwise entirely independent) athletic programs has a profound effect on everyone's college experience, as it plays a part in everything from outlandish tuition rates to disparate access to resources (which are in part funded by tuition) to the erosion of benefits for faculty (which itself leads to deterioration of the education we all paid for).
or maybe everything <i>is</i> just better than it was before, and this post belongs on a poli-board, lol. i digress.
At a meeting where I was informed no faculty would receive raises because the governor had frozen tuition. I was unironicaly informed with great excitement about the new $250,000 marching band practice field.
The accounts are non-fungible.
I dunno. We also had a very large non-denominational chapel built on a public school campus. Donors have weird priorities.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:23 pmSame meeting, yikes. Just rip off that band-aid.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:20 pmI'm at a smaller school now, but athletics are still a big deal.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:12 pm
I don't know about every school, but the P5's like KU, the student-athlete scholarships don't seem to come from the school's general fund, but rather from the for-profit athletic departments' raised funds.
At a meeting where I was informed no faculty would receive raises because the governor had frozen tuition. I was unironicaly informed with great excitement about the new $250,000 marching band practice field.
The accounts are non-fungible.
And, I'm a little curious about the donor(s) that earmarks 1/4 million dollars for the marching band at a small school. Powerful band donors.
Others here would know better than I do, but I'd imagine donors to inconsequential (sorry) causes fall into one (or two) camps: (1) alumni/parents of the cause, or (2) people looking for the cheapest thing they can "buy" their name onto.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:23 pmSame meeting, yikes. Just rip off that band-aid.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:20 pmI'm at a smaller school now, but athletics are still a big deal.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:12 pm
I don't know about every school, but the P5's like KU, the student-athlete scholarships don't seem to come from the school's general fund, but rather from the for-profit athletic departments' raised funds.
At a meeting where I was informed no faculty would receive raises because the governor had frozen tuition. I was unironicaly informed with great excitement about the new $250,000 marching band practice field.
The accounts are non-fungible.
And, I'm a little curious about the donor(s) that earmarks 1/4 million dollars for the marching band at a small school. Powerful band donors.
unfortunately, this is all too true and a main reason i left academia. KU is sitting on a $300+ mil endowment and yet its tenured faculty has decreased by 34% in the past 12 years? to be clear, i don't blame athletics for this, but it plays a part. and the resources, focus, etc. are so disparate from what a university should be doing that it bothers me.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:20 pmI'm at a smaller school now, but athletics are still a big deal.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:12 pmI don't know about every school, but the P5's like KU, the student-athlete scholarships don't seem to come from the school's general fund, but rather from the for-profit athletic departments' raised funds.hoopla wrote: ↑Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:04 pm agree, a college degree has long been more a matter of perseverance than intelligence.
as for earlier, i believe that the facade of tying academics to (otherwise entirely independent) athletic programs has a profound effect on everyone's college experience, as it plays a part in everything from outlandish tuition rates to disparate access to resources (which are in part funded by tuition) to the erosion of benefits for faculty (which itself leads to deterioration of the education we all paid for).
or maybe everything <i>is</i> just better than it was before, and this post belongs on a poli-board, lol. i digress.
At a meeting where I was informed no faculty would receive raises because the governor had frozen tuition. I was unironicaly informed with great excitement about the new $250,000 marching band practice field.
The accounts are non-fungible.
Mostly, you're right.