Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:33 pm
Don't know. But I can tell you this: we have don't have a health care system -- we have a disease care system. Disease is where the money is at so they can prescribe you more and more drugs that end up destroying your organs. A healthy America is not good news to big pharma.
Really smart for a business to lose 30-40% of their customers.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:35 pm Every single post he makes in this thread is an argument in favor of the vaccine passport, which I am a huge fan of, but I assume he is not.
I’ll admit, I too am cynical enough to think the desire for profits can influence things far more than it should.
I agree that a lot of pharma companies are all about profits and have no interest in actually helping people and rather making money. I don't believe it has anything to do with COVID19.Walrus wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:36 pmDon't know. But I can tell you this: we have don't have a health care system -- we have a disease care system. Disease is where the money is at so they can prescribe you more and more drugs that end up destroying your organs. A healthy America is not good news to big pharma.
Except, this was up front money, and a lot of it.ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:37 pmI’ll admit, I too am cynical enough to think the desire for profits can influence things far more than it should.
But if profits are the end game here, wouldn’t they rather have people not vaccinated, and instead vulnerable to severe illness and sitting in hospitals by the millions?
The money’s in the treatment, not the cure.
If the virus is not as dangerous as the news is arguing, maybe it wouldn't be viewed as being profitable enough. Since we know lots of people get covid and require no hospital visit. If you could force everyone into vaccines, it makes $en$e. You have to also be aware that this is likely just the beginning. They have more vaccines planned, which unfortunately is not the best way to handle most viruses.ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:37 pmI’ll admit, I too am cynical enough to think the desire for profits can influence things far more than it should.
But if profits are the end game here, wouldn’t they rather have people not vaccinated, and instead vulnerable to severe illness and sitting in hospitals by the millions?
The money’s in the treatment, not the cure.
It's the gold standard. Head and shoulders better than ANY alternative.Walrus wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:45 pmIf the virus is not as dangerous as the news is arguing, maybe it wouldn't be viewed as being profitable enough. Since we know lots of people get covid and require no hospital visit. If you could force everyone into vaccines, it makes $en$e. You have to also be aware that this is likely just the beginning. They have more vaccines planned, which unfortunately is not the best way to handle most viruses.ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:37 pmI’ll admit, I too am cynical enough to think the desire for profits can influence things far more than it should.
But if profits are the end game here, wouldn’t they rather have people not vaccinated, and instead vulnerable to severe illness and sitting in hospitals by the millions?
The money’s in the treatment, not the cure.
AND. It's not JUST about deaths. Some people were on ventillators for a long time before recovering, Then there's the organ damage seen in many, not to mention covid long haulers.pdub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:48 pm But a lot of people died from COVID though - you have to admit that - so it is still somewhat dangerous.
And the United States ( and the world ) took this MASSIVE economic hit just so big pharma could profit long term? Don't the other people in the secret organizations who are like in charge of other conspiracies like air travel have a say?
I'm not arguing it's "not dangerous" -- it certainly is, for some. Just not nearly as much as what the news was trying to convince the public of. They originally said it was a 3-4% death rate, which we now know is completely false. I know of a few people in their old age who died from covid. I know far more who survived without going to the hospital, and I live in one of the covid epicenters. Statistically, the flu is more dangerous for persons under 17 than covid is.pdub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:48 pm But a lot of people died from COVID though - you have to admit that - so it is still somewhat dangerous.
And the United States ( and the world ) took this MASSIVE economic hit just so big pharma could profit long term? Don't the other people in the secret organizations who are like in charge of other conspiracies like air travel have a say?
I can find a "doctor" wearing a turtle neck on youtube who says you're wrong.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:51 pmAND. It's not JUST about deaths. Some people were on ventillators for a long time before recovering, Then there's the organ damage seen in many, not to mention covid long haulers.pdub wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:48 pm But a lot of people died from COVID though - you have to admit that - so it is still somewhat dangerous.
And the United States ( and the world ) took this MASSIVE economic hit just so big pharma could profit long term? Don't the other people in the secret organizations who are like in charge of other conspiracies like air travel have a say?
There still hasn't been a single death linked to the vaccine, according to the CDC.