Kansas Crimson

The fact that he lied (repeatedly), seems to be the determining factor?

Gutter wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 7:22 pm This thread is one of the most hypocritical in KUwhatever.com/.net history.
There are multiple threads on the BKB Board where people are having circle jerks and would happily would blow Vick if they could - and these are the same people who are all moral and feel the Chiefs had to let Hunt go no matter what the league did or didn't do.
Give me a fucking break.
Carry on

It might be rare, but you're not wrong.

CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Nov 30, 2018 7:58 pmTake into account: I would have also cut Mario Little and LaGerald Vick.

KU76erfan wrote: ↑Sun Dec 02, 2018 11:30 am The fact that he lied (repeatedly), seems to be the determining factor?

Yes. I think he would have just been suspended if he owned up to it from the beginning.

Gutter wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 7:22 pm This thread is one of the most hypocritical in KUwhatever.com/.net history.
There are multiple threads on the BKB Board where people are having circle jerks and would happily would blow Vick if they could - and these are the same people who are all moral and feel the Chiefs had to let Hunt go no matter what the league did or didn't do.
Give me a fucking break.
Carry on

I agree with you 100%. I am also 100% certain that Vick would be kicked off the team tomorrow if video surfaced of whatever happened that led KU to conclude that Vick "likely hit a female student multiple times."

It's also very confusing to me that someone's moral compass can be tuned to these two things at the same time:

* It is an overreaction to cut Hunt in these circumstances, and it would be an overreaction for KU to have cut Vick with a university department responsible for investigations concluding that he likely hit a female student multiple times; and

* It is not just acceptable but desirable and good for universities and (generally white and well-off) administrators and coaches to collude to keep (generally black and not well-off) players from getting a fair chunk of the money they're generating, and it is not just undesirable but unethical and bad for players to get money and play college basketball.

The stances just don't make a lot of sense together.

I’m a complex person.

And that’s also, I assume you’re referring to me, not what I have said.

In regards to Vick, was it proven that he actually did assault her? And if he did assault her, did he apologize for it and not lie about it? Doesn't seem like an apples to apples comparison. I think in these kinds of situations, a person should be given one second chance. If they repeatedly do this kind of behavior, then obviously they've got to go.

When do we start talking about 55?

He’s on pace right now. And now with he running game weaker, wouldn’t be surprised if they throw it a lot at the goal line.

Some good defenses coming up with Baltimore, LA and Seattle. Should be an interesting watch.

i’m rooting for 57

Baltimore next week is going to be tough. That defense is tough and I have a bad feeling that Lamar is going to go wild.
Not to worried about LA. They have historically been bad at Arrowhead.
Seattle is another one. Defense isn’t all that great but playing in seattle is always tough.

He is now #9 in single season TD's, with 4 games left to go. Not bad for your "rookie" season.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... season.htm

Cascadia wrote: ↑Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:11 pm When do we start talking about 55?

The way the standings shape up today, he won't be resting in Week 17. That could be the difference, right?

jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:58 am

Cascadia wrote: ↑Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:11 pm When do we start talking about 55?

The way the standings shape up today, he won't be resting in Week 17. That could be the difference, right?

Yep. Earlier in the year my fear was he wouldn't play (or wouldn't play much) in Week 17. I think if he gets 6-7 TD's in the next two games, this becomes a real conversation. Primarily because I could see him AND Reid really trying to go for the record.

LVCHawk wrote: ↑Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:54 am He is now #9 in single season TD's, with 4 games left to go. Not bad for your "rookie" season.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... season.htm

And, unless something crazy happens, he'll finish no worse than tied for 3rd.

Sure. If the record's in sight, I think we'll throw more in goal-to-go situations. I think it's also - and this is at most a two-TD swing - true that with Ware/Williams instead of Hunt, we're less likely to score rushing TDs from outside of goal-to-go.

All that said, my guess is he ends up between 51-53 for the season.

In the top 10 I'd say the only aberration is Stafford. Everyone else is HOF or future HOF.

I think he'll have trouble with Baltimore and Seattle left on the docket.
He can get 4 at ease v the Raiders.

My guess: 2 TDs v Salty Balty
4 TDs v Chargers
3 TDs v Seattle
4 TDs v Raiders

54 TDs.

pdub wrote: ↑Mon Dec 03, 2018 11:21 am I think he'll have trouble with Baltimore and Seattle left on the docket.
He can get 4 at ease v the Raiders.

My guess: 2 TDs v Salty Balty
4 TDs v Chargers
3 TDs v Seattle
4 TDs v Raiders

54 TDs.

I’d go
2-3
3
2
3-4