Kansas Crimson

so Trump demands a full House vote on the impeachment inquiry, and argues that he doesn't have to comply until it does.

He didn't say he would comply afterwards, just that he definitely won't comply until after that vote.....and then they will need to ride naked on a unicycle backwards through a swamp full of alligators.....and then they will need to.....pretty sure that is how the law works, if you get a subpoena you get to dictate the terms under which you will comply. At least it was the last time I was served.

I'm going to invoke executive privilege.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:53 pm so Trump demands a full House vote on the impeachment inquiry, and argues that he doesn't have to comply until it does.

Thereby committing an impeachable offense by defying the request.

It's nice of Trump to continue to impeach himself. Add it to the pile.

NYTimes reports another whistle blower.

Doesn't matter.

Geezer wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:16 pm NYTimes reports another whistle blower.

NYTimes is not gospel, believe it or not.

dolomite wrote: ↑Sat Oct 05, 2019 12:16 pm

Geezer wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:16 pm NYTimes reports another whistle blower.

NYTimes is not gospel, believe it or not.

Fucking classic.

Did anyone see Hillary on Rachel Maddow from back in May? Regardless of what you think about these two, HRC was prescient about enlisting foreign help, except she was talking about the Dems asking China to hack into IRS servers for the tax returns. Wonder if Li’l Marco thinks that’s a joke as well!!

dolomite wrote: ↑Sat Oct 05, 2019 12:16 pm

Geezer wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:16 pm NYTimes reports another whistle blower.

NYTimes is not gospel, believe it or not.

You can say that again....

Ezekiel 23:20 - She lusted after lovers with genitals as large as a donkey’s and emissions like those of a horse.

dolomite wrote: ↑Sat Oct 05, 2019 12:16 pm

Geezer wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:16 pm NYTimes reports another whistle blower.

NYTimes is not gospel, believe it or not.

Says the man who will believe anything from any source if it supports his narrative.

zsn wrote: ↑Sat Oct 05, 2019 1:20 pm Did anyone see Hillary on Rachel Maddow from back in May? Regardless of what you think about these two, HRC was prescient about enlisting foreign help, except she was talking about the Dems asking China to hack into IRS servers for the tax returns. Wonder if Li’l Marco thinks that’s a joke as well!!

You see the difference between being a standard US citizen saying it to a media member in an interview and being the President of the US saying it to the President of China though, right?

That was her point. What would the reactions from the MAGAs be if Warren stood up and said "China, if you are listening, I am sure the media would appreciate it if you could get copies of Trump's tax returns" and then they hacked the IRS and gave it to Snowden.

Four months later it actually happens, from the South Lawn!!

ousdahl wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:42 am

Lol, a whistleblower convention!

Keep shrugging it off, bro.

The quickest way to impeach the man is to beat him at the polls in 2020.

Keep shrugging it off, bro.