Page 19 of 67

Re: Chefs

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:12 pm
by Sparko
Those outside blitzers are not being picked up. Got too cute

Re: Chefs

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:16 pm
by shindig
Nice flea flicker..lol. Lock looked like he was about to cry 😭

Re: Chefs

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:20 pm
by Sparko
CEH forgot who the QB was. Another fantasy TD missed.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:32 pm
by jhawks99
Maybe the offense can do something

Re: Chefs

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:52 pm
by Sparko
Over under upended. TD streak in place

Re: Chefs

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 6:16 pm
by NewtonHawk11
What a boring blowout.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 6:33 pm
by Deleted User 289
Will be cool when the Chiefs face Brady in the Super Bowl - and it looks like Belichick very well may finish the season with a sub .500 team.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 8:33 pm
by Sparko
Cam Freaking Newton

Re: Chefs

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:25 pm
by Cascadia
Signing Newton was a mistake the day it happened. Still a mistake today

Re: Chefs

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 8:34 am
by pdub
I don't think it was a mistake.
I still think he is better than Hoyer and Stidham.
Neither of those guys goes into Seattle and almost pulls off a win - Cam has a ceiling the others don't.

They loose nothing - one year contract - he doesn't work out ( and it's starting to look that way ) then he's gone.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 8:35 am
by pdub
Chiefs easiest SOS remaining by winning %:

http://www.tankathon.com/nfl/remaining_ ... e_strength

Tampa and Saints of course will be pretty tough.
I'm confident we don't take the Raiders lightly in Vegas.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:06 am
by Cascadia
pdub wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 8:34 am I don't think it was a mistake.
I still think he is better than Hoyer and Stidham.
Neither of those guys goes into Seattle and almost pulls off a win - Cam has a ceiling the others don't.

They loose nothing - one year contract - he doesn't work out ( and it's starting to look that way ) then he's gone.
So now we’re counting “Almost Wins”!

Re: Chefs

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:07 am
by pdub
I'm saying he's a better quarterback than either of the two they have currently on the roster.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:10 am
by Cascadia
And the logic you’re using to come to that conclusion is dumb. Almost Wins!

They would have been better off giving Stidham a development year. Hence, the mistake from day 1.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:15 am
by pdub
Like I said earlier in another thread, I don't think Bill is a tank-a-season kinda guy.
Cam Newton is a better quarterback than either of the two they have currently on the roster.
Stidham currently has a 21.4 QBR with 1 TD and 3 INTs - he's certainly not going to have a game with 450 total yards.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:30 am
by Cascadia
But how many Almost Wins would he have?

Re: Chefs

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:36 am
by holidaysmore
QB isn't the issue. That NE roster offensively is completely devoid of talent. NE thought they could get by with Brady and Bill scheming on ways to get wins and for the most part they did but now it is catching up with them. Victims of their own success.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:50 am
by pdub
Cascadia is an all star at strawman arguments.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:23 pm
by Sparko
I think he has a point with Cam. Stidham looked pretty good against KC. Probably should have made the switch. Cam has a way of just sucking the life out of a team.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:24 pm
by pdub
"Stidham looked pretty good against KC"

Stidham threw the ball 13 times in the KC game, and completed 7 of them, but 2 of those 7 were to the Chiefs.