Page 19 of 67
Re: Chefs
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:12 pm
by Sparko
Those outside blitzers are not being picked up. Got too cute
Re: Chefs
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:16 pm
by shindig
Nice flea flicker..lol. Lock looked like he was about to cry
Re: Chefs
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:20 pm
by Sparko
CEH forgot who the QB was. Another fantasy TD missed.
Re: Chefs
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:32 pm
by jhawks99
Maybe the offense can do something
Re: Chefs
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:52 pm
by Sparko
Over under upended. TD streak in place
Re: Chefs
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 6:16 pm
by NewtonHawk11
What a boring blowout.
Re: Chefs
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 6:33 pm
by Deleted User 289
Will be cool when the Chiefs face Brady in the Super Bowl - and it looks like Belichick very well may finish the season with a sub .500 team.
Re: Chefs
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 8:33 pm
by Sparko
Cam Freaking Newton
Re: Chefs
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:25 pm
by Cascadia
Signing Newton was a mistake the day it happened. Still a mistake today
Re: Chefs
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 8:34 am
by pdub
I don't think it was a mistake.
I still think he is better than Hoyer and Stidham.
Neither of those guys goes into Seattle and almost pulls off a win - Cam has a ceiling the others don't.
They loose nothing - one year contract - he doesn't work out ( and it's starting to look that way ) then he's gone.
Re: Chefs
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 8:35 am
by pdub
Chiefs easiest SOS remaining by winning %:
http://www.tankathon.com/nfl/remaining_ ... e_strength
Tampa and Saints of course will be pretty tough.
I'm confident we don't take the Raiders lightly in Vegas.
Re: Chefs
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:06 am
by Cascadia
pdub wrote: âMon Oct 26, 2020 8:34 am
I don't think it was a mistake.
I still think he is better than Hoyer and Stidham.
Neither of those guys goes into Seattle and almost pulls off a win - Cam has a ceiling the others don't.
They loose nothing - one year contract - he doesn't work out ( and it's starting to look that way ) then he's gone.
So now weâre counting âAlmost Winsâ!
Re: Chefs
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:07 am
by pdub
I'm saying he's a better quarterback than either of the two they have currently on the roster.
Re: Chefs
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:10 am
by Cascadia
And the logic youâre using to come to that conclusion is dumb. Almost Wins!
They would have been better off giving Stidham a development year. Hence, the mistake from day 1.
Re: Chefs
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:15 am
by pdub
Like I said earlier in another thread, I don't think Bill is a tank-a-season kinda guy.
Cam Newton is a better quarterback than either of the two they have currently on the roster.
Stidham currently has a 21.4 QBR with 1 TD and 3 INTs - he's certainly not going to have a game with 450 total yards.
Re: Chefs
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:30 am
by Cascadia
But how many Almost Wins would he have?
Re: Chefs
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:36 am
by holidaysmore
QB isn't the issue. That NE roster offensively is completely devoid of talent. NE thought they could get by with Brady and Bill scheming on ways to get wins and for the most part they did but now it is catching up with them. Victims of their own success.
Re: Chefs
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:50 am
by pdub
Cascadia is an all star at strawman arguments.
Re: Chefs
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:23 pm
by Sparko
I think he has a point with Cam. Stidham looked pretty good against KC. Probably should have made the switch. Cam has a way of just sucking the life out of a team.
Re: Chefs
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:24 pm
by pdub
"Stidham looked pretty good against KC"
Stidham threw the ball 13 times in the KC game, and completed 7 of them, but 2 of those 7 were to the Chiefs.