Page 19 of 23

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 4:51 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns
Actually, it was "a Joe Burrow" TWO weeks ago




but last night it was a .....




Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 5:38 am
by Deleted User 863
LOL




The ending seemed fine to me.

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 5:41 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns
BasketballJayhawk wrote: Mon Feb 13, 2023 5:38 am LOL




The ending seemed fine to me.
Amazing how many people are bitching that the refs made the right/proper call.

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 5:43 am
by pdub
That’s a tough call to change the outcome but his jersey was clearly grabbed.

A TD wasn’t overturned ( like Boltons 2nd ) and we likely woulda got a FG regardless. Eagles just would have had a chance to score again.

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 5:53 am
by pdub
Chiefs coach Andy Reid said he is not planning to retire following the team's victory in Super Bowl LVII.
“I look in the mirror and I’m old," Reid began in his post-game press conference. "My heart, though, is young. I still enjoy doing what I’m doing. I got asked that 50 times here. Finally I just go, ‘Whatever, man. Whatever.’ ... I’m good with what I’m doing right now. Listen, if they’ll have me, I’ll stick around.”

Patrick Mahomes completed 21-of-27 passes for 182 yards and three touchdowns in the Chiefs' 38-35, Super LVII victory over the Eagles, adding six rushes for 44 additional yards.
With Kansas City trailing 24-14 at halftime, Mahomes was just 8-of-13 for 89 yards and one score. Then coach Andy Reid and the Chiefs flipped the switch and scored on every single one of their second half possessions to take home the third Super Bowl victory in franchise history. It was another mold-shattering season for the most valuable player in football, with Mahomes leading the league in yards (5,250), passing touchdowns (41) and QBR (77.6)… The scary part for the rest of the league is, 2022 was probably as weak as Mahomes’ supporting cast will ever be.

https://www.nbcsportsedge.com/football/ ... =headlines

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 6:56 am
by KUTradition
BasketballJayhawk wrote: Mon Feb 13, 2023 4:06 am
KUTradition wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 7:48 pm not pregnant, but just had a baby
yes, i read that afterwards too

good job!!

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 7:07 am
by Deleted User 863
KUTradition wrote: Mon Feb 13, 2023 6:56 am
BasketballJayhawk wrote: Mon Feb 13, 2023 4:06 am
KUTradition wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 7:48 pm not pregnant, but just had a baby
yes, i read that afterwards too

good job!!
Well, I felt bad. Never good to assume someone is pregnant and then be wrong.

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 7:26 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns







Now back to football.....
Anyone else forget this happened last year?


Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 7:52 am
by twocoach
Glad I left a spot for a new Super Bowl winner when I hung all my stuff in the new basement.

Since 2008:
2 Chiefs Super Bowls plus played for another
2 KU titles plus played for another
1 Royals title plus played for another

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 8:12 am
by Sparko
It was a clean game and well officiated. I wasn't happy with some missed calls, but when you hold on a timing pattern? Has to be flagged. All of us saw the terrible way the TCU game ended. Because its late in the game doesn't mean you get to cheat. Or shouldn't anyway. I was surprised at the Philly bias in the media all week. That wasn't the 1985 Bears defense. They feasted on really bad teams. KC was better.

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 9:53 am
by KUTradition
Sparko wrote: Mon Feb 13, 2023 8:12 am Because it’s late in the game doesn't mean you get to cheat.
^^^^^

i’ve seen just one write-up that even mentioned the other bad calls, and that one sad it best…that philly had failed to stop the Chiefs at all in the second half, so all of the hubub proclaiming that the calm cost philly the game is nonsense

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 9:59 am
by NewtonHawk11
Plus, the Chiefs arguably had 2 big calls go against them. I thought the fumble returned for TD that was reversed and called incomplete should have stood. Also, don't think Goedert caught that ball cleanly before his foot came up.

The officiating was completely fine.

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:28 am
by Shirley
pdub wrote: Mon Feb 13, 2023 5:43 am That’s a tough call to change the outcome but his jersey was clearly grabbed.

A TD wasn’t overturned ( like Boltons 2nd ) and we likely woulda got a FG regardless. Eagles just would have had a chance to score again.
^^

But, I'd feel better about it if it had been a more catchable ball. I'm not certain it was, even if he wasn't held.

What a classy, standup guy:

James Bradberry admits late penalty call was on him

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:54 am
by jfish26
Feral wrote: Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:28 am
pdub wrote: Mon Feb 13, 2023 5:43 am That’s a tough call to change the outcome but his jersey was clearly grabbed.

A TD wasn’t overturned ( like Boltons 2nd ) and we likely woulda got a FG regardless. Eagles just would have had a chance to score again.
^^

But, I'd feel better about it if it had been a more catchable ball. I'm not certain it was, even if he wasn't held.

What a classy, standup guy:

James Bradberry admits late penalty call was on him
But the call wasn't pass interference. There's no catchability test. And the reason is that holding prevents a ball from being catchable in the first place.

The late hit in the Bengals game was the correct call, even though the contact was on the lighter side and the contact did not affect the play on the field.

The defensive hold call here was not remotely questionable. It was the correct call, and it impacted the play on the field.

As a football fan, would it have been fun to see Hurts try to answer? Of course. But arguably he should have been answering a TD, not a FG.

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 11:03 am
by Shirley
jfish26 wrote: Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:54 am
Feral wrote: Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:28 am
pdub wrote: Mon Feb 13, 2023 5:43 am That’s a tough call to change the outcome but his jersey was clearly grabbed.

A TD wasn’t overturned ( like Boltons 2nd ) and we likely woulda got a FG regardless. Eagles just would have had a chance to score again.
^^

But, I'd feel better about it if it had been a more catchable ball. I'm not certain it was, even if he wasn't held.

What a classy, standup guy:

James Bradberry admits late penalty call was on him
But the call wasn't pass interference. There's no catchability test. And the reason is that holding prevents a ball from being catchable in the first place.

The late hit in the Bengals game was the correct call, even though the contact was on the lighter side and the contact did not affect the play on the field.

The defensive hold call here was not remotely questionable. It was the correct call, and it impacted the play on the field.

As a football fan, would it have been fun to see Hurts try to answer? Of course. But arguably he should have been answering a TD, not a FG.
^^^

I'd still feel better about it if it had been a more catchable ball.

If I won a mt bike race because the cyclist in front of me flatted, I'm not sorry I won, but I'd feel better about it if he hadn't.

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 11:14 am
by Sparko
The route was supposed to be a quick out but the hold prevented that and juju had to run a wheel. Mahomes spotted the hold and threw the ball and pointed out the holding immediately. He is MVP for a reason.

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 11:47 am
by KUTradition
KUTradition wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 9:38 pm
Feral wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 9:36 pm
KUTradition wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 9:29 pm i think Bradshaw needs to fade off into the sunset
No kidding. His "interview" of Reid was bad.
the cheap shots at Reid’s size admittedly bothered me
i know he’s old, but c’mon…

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/amp/nfl ... jpbwpigifs

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 2:31 pm
by KUTradition
ousdahl wrote: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:56 pm Speaking as generously as possible, I’m just a casual Rihanna fan.

The only two songs I recognized from the show are still the only two songs i could identify if I had to.

With that said, I thought the choreography was pretty awesome. The overall production was cool too, with the floating platforms and stuff.

But, the song selection overall seemed like they all kinda sounded the same. And Rihanna’s stage presence was good, and had a few good dance moves too.

But her vocals/singing voice didn’t seem virtuoso or anything, I guess?

And only one real big time hit performed/in her catalogue (umbrella). Are there others?

I was torn about bitch better have my money. Part of me thought it was edgy and badass, part of me thought it was hilarious, and part of me thought it, uh, maybe wasn’t the best song for such a short yet high-profile show.

And it’s cool they gave the whole show to her but I was also kinda waiting the whole show for some being special guest reveal that never happened
i was seriously waiting Jay Z

he was actually in attendance, too

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 2:48 pm
by Deleted User 863
Some people are going nuts talking about how awesome her HT performance was. Kind of surprised by that.

I didn't think it was bad by any means. I'd give it a 7.2/10

Re: Super Bowl LVII

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 2:53 pm
by NewtonHawk11
Yeah a solid 7.5/10.

No guests. She put out banger after banger. While pregnant. On floating stages.

And her first song was "Bitch better have my money" Just great.

There wasn't much "show" which is why I dropped it a point or two. But for pure substance, just a damn solid performance.