He dead. I guess if someone had to be shot and die/be killed it's better him than someone else.
Again, I sure wish I knew how/why the guy was able to own/possess guns when he had been visited numerous times (including by the Secret Service) for threatening to kill the President, Mayor, and others.
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Sat Jun 03, 2023 5:45 am
He dead. I guess if someone had to be shot and die/be killed it's better him than someone else.
Again, I sure wish I knew how/why the guy was able to own/possess guns when he had been visited numerous times (including by the Secret Service) for threatening to kill the President, Mayor, and others.
Real Americans can take comfort knowing that despite all the episodes and events leading up to his untimely death, this man's 2nd Amendment, God-given rights, were never violated!
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Sat Jun 03, 2023 5:45 am
He dead. I guess if someone had to be shot and die/be killed it's better him than someone else.
Again, I sure wish I knew how/why the guy was able to own/possess guns when he had been visited numerous times (including by the Secret Service) for threatening to kill the President, Mayor, and others.
Real Americans can take comfort knowing that despite all the episodes and events leading up to his untimely death, this man's 2nd Amendment, God-given rights, were never violated!
Is this a great country, or what!?
BINGO!
I feel this fucker should NOT have been in possession of firearms. Period - but that brings me to my confusion/conundrum.
At what point do "we" address that too often rights outweigh the safety and well being of Americans and become a major factor in OTHER INNOCENT people UNNECESSARILY getting killed because of those rights - and what are the differences between rights and laws and how do "we" decide to choose to monitor and "police" those rights and laws?
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Sat Jun 03, 2023 5:45 am
He dead. I guess if someone had to be shot and die/be killed it's better him than someone else.
Again, I sure wish I knew how/why the guy was able to own/possess guns when he had been visited numerous times (including by the Secret Service) for threatening to kill the President, Mayor, and others.
Real Americans can take comfort knowing that despite all the episodes and events leading up to his untimely death, this man's 2nd Amendment, God-given rights, were never violated!
Is this a great country, or what!?
BINGO!
I feel this fucker should NOT have been in possession of firearms. Period - but that brings me to my confusion/conundrum.
At what point do "we" address that too often rights outweigh the safety and well being of Americans and become a major factor in OTHER INNOCENT people UNNECESSARILY getting killed because of those rights - and what are the differences between rights and laws and how do "we" decide to choose to monitor and "police" those rights and laws?
"This one is different," said news anchors on April 20, 1999.
Re: Another mass shooting
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2023 8:10 pm
by RainbowsandUnicorns
National News.....
Not National News....
Doesn't really matter to me what does and doesn't make the national news.
What matters to me is it's a never ending way too frequent/common occurrence.
Re: Another mass shooting
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2023 9:28 pm
by TDub
Chicago is a disaster zone.
Also, gun laws arent stopping that....those are illegal now, not too mention i guarantee the serial numbers are filed off etc etc.
The Democratic governor’s proposal would raise the federal minimum age to buy a firearm to 21 from 18; mandate universal background checks; institute a “reasonable” waiting period for all gun purchases and ban assault rifles nationally.
One of the next big challenges for school administrators everywhere is going to be maintaining liability insurance.
A mass shooting on campus causes billions of dollars in liability. Without meaningful action to prevent school shootings, insurers may decide schools are uninsurable. Inversely, taking reckless actions like arming teachers can increase risk causing insurance policies to be dropped.
As shooting victims at Michigan State file lawsuits relating to the failure of MSU to provide basic campus security, inaction is also not an option.
Re: Another mass shooting
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2023 8:52 am
by jfish26
Yep. Looking forward to the pubs declaring those notoriously progressive organizations - insurance companies - to be too woke.
Re: Another mass shooting
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2023 9:35 am
by Shirley
jfish26 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 8:52 am
Yep. Looking forward to the pubs declaring those notoriously progressive organizations - insurance companies - to be too woke.
Living in Florida, where "woke comes to die", I have no idea what you're talking about. But, I know that republicans are Christians, so I know it must be good...
Re: Another mass shooting
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2023 10:54 am
by zsn
Looks like someone’s idea of involving insurance companies in this fight from a few pages ago seems to be getting traction, but not quite as originally proposed. Let’s hope small victories magnify themselves