Kansas Crimson

vega wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 2:48 pm

pdub wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 2:47 pm Appeal hell in the future?

On what grounds? You don’t get to say “no fair”

they’re gonna try and use Maxine Waters’ comments to suggest she biased jurors

And to a lesser extent, Biden's.

Somebody page Lobby

pdub wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 2:52 pm Lawyers always have some trick up their sleeve.
I wouldn't be surprised at some bullshit technicality appeal.

That's not how appeals really work. You need to attack the procedural aspects, not the facts. If it does come to a procedural thing, then the thing gets retried. Yes, there will be appeals, as any good attorney should use every bullet in the gun to protect their clients. However, this was a fairly straight forward case, with very straight forward evidence.

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 2:56 pm

vega wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 2:48 pm

pdub wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 2:47 pm Appeal hell in the future?

On what grounds? You don’t get to say “no fair”

they’re gonna try and use Maxine Waters’ comments to suggest she biased jurors

That is what she was trying to do.

procedural thing == bullshit technicality appeal

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 2:56 pm

vega wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 2:48 pm

pdub wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 2:47 pm Appeal hell in the future?

On what grounds? You don’t get to say “no fair”

they’re gonna try and use Maxine Waters’ comments to suggest she biased jurors

Lol, if you think some random congresswoman from California is going to hold weight, especially when jurors are supposed to be avoiding the news anyway, then no case can ever stand. This was a high-profile case. That sort of outside influence is already built into the system. It's not grounds for appeal.

pdub wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 3:01 pm procedural thing == bullshit technicality appeal

Ur dum

Almost always a point of error to raise. Raise, but not grant new trial.

Supposedly the Judge gave them the Maxine point yesterday after the mistrial denial. Frickin police union will definitely brief that one up.

Guilty. Guilty. Guilty.

vega wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 3:01 pm

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 2:56 pm

vega wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 2:48 pm

On what grounds? You don’t get to say “no fair”

they’re gonna try and use Maxine Waters’ comments to suggest she biased jurors

Lol, if you think some random congresswoman from California is going to hold weight, especially when jurors are supposed to be avoiding the news anyway, then no case can ever stand. This was a high-profile case. That sort of outside influence is already built into the system. It's not grounds for appeal.

talk to mich

If there is no appeal, then i dum.
If there is an appeal, then ur dum.

pdub wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 3:03 pm If there is no appeal, then i dum.
If there is an appeal, then ur dum.

No, there will be appeals. There will be appeals in hours after a verdict if it's guilty. That's just how the system works. There will be appeals for months if not years.

But there will be no successful appeals.

Too late.
I was arguing appeals and not successful appeals.
If there are appeals, ur dumb.

pdub wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 3:07 pm Too late.
I was arguing appeals and not successful appeals.
If there are appeals, ur dumb.

Dum. Your welcome.

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 3:15 pm

pdub wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 3:07 pm Too late.
I was arguing appeals and not successful appeals.
If there are appeals, ur dumb.

Dum. Your welcome.

Its welcum, you dunce.

U dunce

What’s going on, they waiting to finish counting ballots in Nevada or something?

Jurors running late...it’s almost like everybody today is stoned

Guilty
Guilty
Guilty