Re: Dems take the House
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 11:13 am
to be fair, I dunno if Dems are competent enough to cheat.
That about sums you up.twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:54 amI don't careDCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 12:52 pmNo he didn't. He argued his partisan interpretation of an event and pretended it was fact.
Moreover, anyone who has bothered to look at the data over several election cycles dating back decades knows that the Democrats' biggest problem in the House is the overconcentration of votes in too few districts. It does the party no good, for example, to run unopposed candidates in California or to win by a margin of 90-10 in other urban districts. Almost all of those votes are wasted, in that they contribute to larger vote totals but deliver no more seats.
The regression models are pretty clear. When you control for overconcentration of votes, the differences between the parties in terms of total votes earned nationally trends toward statistical insignificance. Even on a district-by-district basis, the models clearly show that advantage attained by the GOP by redistricting is vanishingly small.
The editing of someone's post like that is beneath you. We disagree here quite frequently but you rarely stoop to such a poop-joke caliber level.DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 08, 2018 11:28 amThat about sums you up.twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:54 amI don't careDCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 12:52 pm
No he didn't. He argued his partisan interpretation of an event and pretended it was fact.
Moreover, anyone who has bothered to look at the data over several election cycles dating back decades knows that the Democrats' biggest problem in the House is the overconcentration of votes in too few districts. It does the party no good, for example, to run unopposed candidates in California or to win by a margin of 90-10 in other urban districts. Almost all of those votes are wasted, in that they contribute to larger vote totals but deliver no more seats.
The regression models are pretty clear. When you control for overconcentration of votes, the differences between the parties in terms of total votes earned nationally trends toward statistical insignificance. Even on a district-by-district basis, the models clearly show that advantage attained by the GOP by redistricting is vanishingly small.
And to think y'all have the gall to accuse us of anti-intellectualism.
Oh, they are. No doubt that they are trying and as DC pointed out, they have been caught doing it before. But the GOP ramped it up big time after Obama won.