Kansas Crimson

It's almost like the last two years nevar happened.

defixione wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:27 pm I find it telling that they won yet they're still whining about Obama and Hillary. lol

They're the ones probably responsible for starting the whole investigation mess in the first place.
Dossier, FBI, JFC.

defixione wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:27 pm I find it telling that they won yet they're still whining about Obama and Hillary. lol

I'd say it's more crowing than whining.

dolomite wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2019 12:50 am

defixione wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:27 pm I find it telling that they won yet they're still whining about Obama and Hillary. lol

I'd say it's more crowing than whining.

That's what you think it sounds like.

21 million people losing their health insurance, 133 million subject again to pre-existing condition exclusions.

Seems like the whining could get quite loud.

dolomite wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 4:29 pm

Feral wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:57 am

And, considering how important healthcare was to voters in 2018, the fact that the ACA has 50% support and only 37% are against it in a Kaiser poll this month, Democrats will gladly take those odds.

I love it when people bring up polls. Cankles had been given what, a 90% chance to win the election. Thank God for collusion. I guess that dossier backfired on her. LOL

I know you'd rather talk about the 2016 election, but the abject idiocy of Trump making a 180 degree turn by threatening cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, and exposing Americans to the uncertainty and even greater financial predation by health insurance companies by removing protection for pre-existing conditions, children from their parent's insurance, et al., is hard to quantify, or exaggerate. In the 2018 election where democrats made historic gains, > 50% of media spots for democrats emphasized our nation's tenuous health care system. We can't thank the drama queen in the WH enough, whose reality TV mentality obsession/compulsion to incite friction and conflict in the populace is an act that's getting old, even for republicans.

House GOP leader urged Trump to hold off on latest ObamaCare assault

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) recently told President Trump he didn't agree with the administration's effort to have the Affordable Care Act deemed invalid in federal court, according to a source familiar with the conversation.

...Some Republicans have been more vocal about their frustrations with the administration’s decision.

House Republican Conference Chairwoman Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) argued the president’s timing hurt what could have been one of the best messaging weeks of his administration following the outcome of special counsel Robert Mueller's report and success in holding up his veto on a bill admonishing his national emergency declaration.

“He didn’t have to do it now," she told Fox News.

Heard Sibelius yesterday saying it was actually closer to 150 million that will be back in the pre-existing condition group.

yeah, but discussing the facts is no match for DC's gif of a squirrel dressed like a horse!

Shouldn't you be screeching at Seahawk and Feral to get back on topic?

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:10 am Shouldn't you be screeching at Seahawk and Feral to get back on topic?

Shirley's (I mean Feral's) law.

Yeah, let's get back on topic. What's to loose if the full report, minus national security redactions, is turned over to John Doe?

defixione wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:58 am Yeah, let's get back on topic. What's to loose if the full report, minus national security redactions, is turned over to John Doe?

Hey defix, just wondering, do you not know the difference between “lose” and “loose”?

defixione wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:58 am Yeah, let's get back on topic. What's to loose if the full report, minus national security redactions, is turned over to John Doe?

Two weeks, apparently.

dolomite wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 9:32 pm

defixione wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:58 am Yeah, let's get back on topic. What's to loose if the full report, minus national security redactions, is turned over to John Doe?

Hey defix, just wondering, do you not know the difference between “lose” and “loose”?

You must be new here

url=https://thehill.com/homenews/news/43588 ... ler-report]84 percent want Mueller report made public[/url]

A large majority back the public release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s full report, according to a new Quinnipiac poll released Tuesday.

Eighty-four percent of respondents said the report should be made public, according to the survey, with only 9 percent saying it should not. Among Republicans, the divide was slightly smaller, but still stark, with 75 percent supporting release of the report and 17 percent opposing it.

[...]

Feral wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 8:53 am url=https://thehill.com/homenews/news/43588 ... ler-report]84 percent want Mueller report made public[/url]

A large majority back the public release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s full report, according to a new Quinnipiac poll released Tuesday.

Eighty-four percent of respondents said the report should be made public, according to the survey, with only 9 percent saying it should not. Among Republicans, the divide was slightly smaller, but still stark, with 75 percent supporting release of the report and 17 percent opposing it.

[...]

Releasing and analyzing the report will only cause more second guessing. If Mueller couldn't find enough evidence then no one can.

Not if Barr is honest and neutral in his assertion. Mueller never said that, Barr, the store bought AG, did. You're not interested in seeing it first hand?

defixione wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 12:31 pm Not if Barr is honest and neutral in his assertion. Mueller never said that, Barr, the store bought AG, did. You're not interested in seeing it first hand?

Sure, why not.

A voice of reason: Gabbard, who lags in 2020 polls behind better-known rivals, said in a video posted to her Twitter account that “now that Mueller has reported that his investigation revealed no such collusion, we all need to put aside our partisan interests and recognize that finding that the president of the United States did not conspire with Russia to interfere with our elections is a good thing for our country.”
https://news.yahoo.com/tulsi-gabbard-ca ... 18063.html