Kansas Crimson

jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 2:41 pm I do think that, with the Pooka situation resolved, Vegas' 2.5 wins line is a bit light.

Is it still just 2.5?

KU definitely gets to 3. The home schedule is very favorable this year.

How can I bet on the 2.5 over/under? I’d put $500 down on the over

NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 4:00 pm

jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 2:41 pm I do think that, with the Pooka situation resolved, Vegas' 2.5 wins line is a bit light.

Is it still just 2.5?

KU definitely gets to 3. The home schedule is very favorable this year.

I'm not sure if it was ever 2.5. Lowest I initially saw was 3 and then it got upped to 3.5. I was tempted at 3.5. I believe they can take care of the non conference schedule and then try and steal a game between Tech, WVU and KSU.

It’s currently at an even 3 at Westgate.

PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 3:43 pm
My brain tells me 3-9.
My gut says Miles is good for one decent upset to get us to 4-9

Man are they setting requisites for bowl games low these days.

pdub wrote: ↑Thu Jul 18, 2019 8:36 am

PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 3:43 pm
My brain tells me 3-9.
My gut says Miles is good for one decent upset to get us to 4-9

Man are they setting requisites for bowl games low these days.

conference title game dummy.

I'm not certain that's mathematically possible.

pdub wrote: ↑Thu Jul 18, 2019 9:10 am I'm not certain that's mathematically possible.

0-3 in non-con, 4-6 in the Big12.

OU goes 10-0

TCU goes 8-2 but has to vacate all their wins because Gary Patterson's excessive belt hitching and visor adjustments violate the rules of human conduct.

everyone else goes 4-6.

We win tie-breaker.

It's pretty simple math, really.

So the ruling to vacate their season happens in a week?
I wish the NCAA/B12 would act that quickly when it comes to rulings with us.

pdub wrote: ↑Thu Jul 18, 2019 9:25 am So the ruling to vacate their season happens in a week?
I wish the NCAA/B12 would act that quickly when it comes to rulings with us.

Patterson is warned about it after his first game and he's given a number of belt/visor adjustments that he has to stay under, he goes over that limit in the final game of the season, and the ruling is made immediately.

This really isn't complicated.

I'll let the resident lawyers weigh in on that.
Seems like that could make it's way to the Supreme Court.

pdub wrote: ↑Thu Jul 18, 2019 9:42 am I'll let the resident lawyers weigh in on that.
Seems like that could make it's way to the Supreme Court.

it's an ncaa ruling, not a legal one.

But I'd do think this amount of swass, ought to be illegal.

Well sure.
But to strip a team of it's wins because of a coach's visor adjustments seems it could be a violation of some part of the constitution.

pdub wrote: ↑Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:00 am Well sure.
But to strip a team of it's wins because of a coach's visor adjustments seems it could be a violation of some part of the constitution.

it's not.

pdub wrote: ↑Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:00 am Well sure.
But to strip a team of it's wins because of a coach's visor adjustments seems it could be a violation of some part of the constitution.

We dont have one of those any more.

I woke up in the middle of the after a vivid dream that KU lost the home opener.

Middle of the night

That is and would be a nightmare.

I didn’t go to the game but only heard the score. It was real enough that in my groggy state my first instinct was to grab my phone to check ESPN.

I still vividly remember the evening where KU lost it's home opener to North Dakota State 6-3.