Page 3 of 6
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2019 11:10 pm
by Deleted User 62
"Let me spell it out for you: He's voted against the wars when Bush was in charge; he's voted for the wars when Obama or Clinton was in charge.".
Ummmm...because the war that Bush started was horseshit.
Are you seriously this stupid?
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2019 11:10 pm
by Deleted User 62
lobster wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 10:59 pm
Sorry, you're in the same category as chikin, which means I can't be bothered to give you a serious reply.
You seem...I dunno....Pwned.
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 6:58 am
by Geezer
Lobby is a strange one.
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 7:42 am
by jhawks99
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 9:10 am
by Deleted User 89
but what about all those links lobs provided to support his claim?
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 10:06 am
by Deleted User 266
lobster wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 10:55 pm
Mjl wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:52 pm
You're talking about how he was what, the only senator to vote against going into Iraq?
I am not a Bernie supporter - But I do support the truth. You're living in an alternate reality dude.
I expected this from the "my team" people, but you? I'll sadly have to put you in the same category of person that chikin is.
Let me spell it out for you: He's voted against the wars when Bush was in charge; he's voted for the wars when Obama or Clinton was in charge. It's a simple Google search to see all the things he's voted on. Pwned.
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 10:57 am
by chiknbut
lobster wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 6:50 pm
If you don't know how to find public voting records online, should you really be discussing politics on here? Just sayin'.
Remember, it's called verifying. Lobs doesn't "believe," he verifies.
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:10 am
by twocoach
chiknbut wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 10:57 am
lobster wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 6:50 pm
If you don't know how to find public voting records online, should you really be discussing politics on here? Just sayin'.
Remember, it's called verifying. Lobs doesn't "believe," he verifies.
He must only verify his YouTube videos.
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:57 am
by seahawk
Mjl wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:52 pm
You're talking about how he was what, the only senator to vote against going into Iraq?
I am not a Bernie supporter - But I do support the truth. You're living in an alternate reality dude.
Bernie was actually a congressperson at the time. The senator who ranted on the Senate floor and who got the intelligence declassified enough for his colleagues to read it was Bob Graham of Florida. He was head of the Senate Intelligence Committee at the time and according to colleagues later, this courtly older gentleman was practically raving on the Senate floor, trying to get other Senators to read the NIE and other briefings. Graham was one of 23 Democrats to vote against the Iraq resolution.
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 12:22 pm
by chiknbut
seahawk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:57 am
Mjl wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:52 pm
You're talking about how he was what, the only senator to vote against going into Iraq?
I am not a Bernie supporter - But I do support the truth. You're living in an alternate reality dude.
Bernie was actually a congressperson at the time. The senator who ranted on the Senate floor and who got the intelligence declassified enough for his colleagues to read it was Bob Graham of Florida. He was head of the Senate Intelligence Committee at the time and according to colleagues later, this courtly older gentleman was practically raving on the Senate floor, trying to get other Senators to read the NIE and other briefings. Graham was one of 23 Democrats to vote against the Iraq resolution.
Sea, unless you provide a youtube video of this happening, I can't believe...I mean verify this to be true.
Better luck next time.
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 2:44 pm
by Deleted User 104
To help those who have never actually looked into Sanders' voting record, here are a few examples. Can't get any clearer than this. Sure, he's voted against wars at times, but he's voted a lot more times in favor of supporting existing wars and sanctions, which end up killing thousands of people abroad.
Just a few to help you on your homework assignment...
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/107-2001/h342
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/105-1998/h482
You're welcome.
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 3:26 pm
by Deleted User 62
I stand corrected...…
….someone can be this stupid.
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 3:49 pm
by chiknbut
jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 3:26 pm
I stand corrected...…
….someone can be this stupid.
Hey, cut Lobs some slack. It can't be easy to educate a bunch of retards on this board.
(note, someone please "quote" this response so the guy who makes fun of people with Down Syndrome gets a chance to take a look.
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 3:54 pm
by Deleted User 62
chiknbut wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 3:49 pm
jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 3:26 pm
I stand corrected...…
….someone can be this stupid.
Hey, cut Lobs some slack. It can't be easy to educate a bunch of retards on this board.
(note, someone please "quote" this response so the guy who makes fun of people with Down Syndrome gets a chance to take a look.
Done.
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 4:02 pm
by Deleted User 89
oh, so he isn’t pro-war...just pro-“some” wars...
wouldn’t that make him anti-“some” wars then too?
and then by lobs’ logic, he could actually be considered anti-war
am i doing this right?
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 4:13 pm
by Deleted User 104
One cannot be anit-war if they vote for war -- It's called a contradiction.
If you simply looked into his record, you would notice he usually voted for war when the democrats had a president. In other words, it's about supporting his "team." I can see why people would like this idea, given that so many on here fit right in with this description. I mean, how sad and pathetic is it that
no one actually knew his voting record except for me?
But thanks for admitting that the links I provided verified my claims. Others just responded with their feelz, but you confirmed my sources.
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 4:25 pm
by Deleted User 89
at least you know how to use emojis
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 4:31 pm
by Deleted User 62
lobster wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 4:13 pm
One cannot be anit-war if they vote for war -- It's called a contradiction.
If you simply looked into his record, you would notice he usually voted for war when the democrats had a president. In other words, it's about supporting his "team." I can see why people would like this idea, given that so many on here fit right in with this description. I mean, how sad and pathetic is it that
no one actually knew his voting record except for me?
But thanks for admitting that the links I provided verified my claims. Others just responded with their feelz, but you confirmed my sources.
Is there any part of you that could understand that voting AGAINST action less than a week after the Sept 11 attacks would be career suicide?
Also, in your second example....it wasn't a war declaration...or as far as I can see...any reference to a war at all.
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 4:39 pm
by Deleted User 104
Yeah, let's just bomb and invade another country that had nothing to do with 911 because it will hurt my career.
Just admit it, you were wrong. Finish your homework assignment and look at the dozens of other times he's voted for military involvement...
Re: OFFICIAL DCHAWK RETURN WATCH THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 5:11 pm
by chiknbut
lobster wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 4:39 pm
Yeah, let's just bomb and invade another country that had nothing to do with 911 because it will hurt my career.
Just admit it, you were wrong. Finish your homework assignment and look at the dozens of other times he's voted for military involvement...
Much more effective when you call people "retards," Lobby.