Kansas Crimson

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 6:57 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 1:55 pm

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 1:34 pm

How about Steve Schmidt?

Definitely not a Conservative, considering he is a Schwartzenegger and McCain guy. That big-government/globalist wing of the party is one of the issues that caused me to stop affiliating as Republican. So, to answer your question, not a fan.

So your definition of a Conservative now is what "someone who doesnt bad mouth the President"?

I would expect a Conservative to get behind the Party representative, even if he/she doesn't completely agree with him.

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:53 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 6:57 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 1:55 pm

Definitely not a Conservative, considering he is a Schwartzenegger and McCain guy. That big-government/globalist wing of the party is one of the issues that caused me to stop affiliating as Republican. So, to answer your question, not a fan.

So your definition of a Conservative now is what "someone who doesnt bad mouth the President"?

I would expect a Conservative to get behind the Party representative, even if he/she doesn't completely agree with him.

Yikes. Blind faith and devotion devoid of thought is not what I look for in a politician.

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:22 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:53 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 6:57 am
So your definition of a Conservative now is what "someone who doesnt bad mouth the President"?

I would expect a Conservative to get behind the Party representative, even if he/she doesn't completely agree with him.

Yikes. Blind faith and devotion devoid of thought is not what I look for in a politician.

So, if the DNC were to nominate Burnie, you would vote for him just because?

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:32 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:22 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:53 am

I would expect a Conservative to get behind the Party representative, even if he/she doesn't completely agree with him.

Yikes. Blind faith and devotion devoid of thought is not what I look for in a politician.

So, if the DNC were to nominate Burnie, you would vote for him just because?

That is two completely different topics. I'd say "nice try" but it wasn't.

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:34 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:32 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:22 am
Yikes. Blind faith and devotion devoid of thought is not what I look for in a politician.

So, if the DNC were to nominate Burnie, you would vote for him just because?

That is two completely different topics. I'd say "nice try" but it wasn't.

Blind faith is blind faith, no?

Remember when we had a president like this, who some here went nuts over because he wore mom jeans?
Here he was after Sandy Hook.

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:53 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 6:57 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 1:55 pm

Definitely not a Conservative, considering he is a Schwartzenegger and McCain guy. That big-government/globalist wing of the party is one of the issues that caused me to stop affiliating as Republican. So, to answer your question, not a fan.

So your definition of a Conservative now is what "someone who doesnt bad mouth the President"?

I would expect a Conservative to get behind the Party representative, even if he/she doesn't completely agree with him.

Well...guess what? I'm a conservative and I want to kick him in his frontbutt.

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:40 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:34 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:32 am

So, if the DNC were to nominate Burnie, you would vote for him just because?

That is two completely different topics. I'd say "nice try" but it wasn't.

Blind faith is blind faith, no?

No.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 12:48 pm

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:53 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 6:57 am
So your definition of a Conservative now is what "someone who doesnt bad mouth the President"?

I would expect a Conservative to get behind the Party representative, even if he/she doesn't completely agree with him.

Well...guess what? I'm a conservative and I want to kick him in his frontbutt.

I would argue that there's a difference between being frustrated with the representative and actively seeking to undermine him.

Fine.

But at this very moment, HE'S undermining everything conservatives believe, including (and most especially) his own agenda.

At this point, does he even have an agenda? The CDC fiasco would indicate that he's so completely lost that his only agenda is flailing on TV.

Are Republicans talking about trying to get him to resign yet?

seahawk wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:08 pm At this point, does he even have an agenda? The CDC fiasco would indicate that he's so completely lost that his only agenda is flailing on TV.

Are Republicans talking about trying to get him to resign yet?

His agenda is to stay in power as long as possible.

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:05 pm

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 12:48 pm

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:53 am

I would expect a Conservative to get behind the Party representative, even if he/she doesn't completely agree with him.

Well...guess what? I'm a conservative and I want to kick him in his frontbutt.

I would argue that there's a difference between being frustrated with the representative and actively seeking to undermine him.

What if that representative is actively undermining conservative principles in this country? Still support him just because (R) or ......?

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:17 pm

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:05 pm

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 12:48 pm


Well...guess what? I'm a conservative and I want to kick him in his frontbutt.

I would argue that there's a difference between being frustrated with the representative and actively seeking to undermine him.

What if that representative is actively undermining conservative principles in this country? Still support him just because (R) or ......?

What is Option B?

seahawk wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:08 pm At this point, does he even have an agenda? The CDC fiasco would indicate that he's so completely lost that his only agenda is flailing on TV.

Are Republicans talking about trying to get him to resign yet?

A. Sorry. i meant his implied agenda or at least the agenda he ran on. His current agenda is freakingourabouttryingtolooklikehe'snotfreakingout.

B.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:04 pm He should resign now.

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:46 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:17 pm

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:05 pm

I would argue that there's a difference between being frustrated with the representative and actively seeking to undermine him.

What if that representative is actively undermining conservative principles in this country? Still support him just because (R) or ......?

What is Option B?

That's the problem. there is no option B. Political distancing to go along with the social distancing is all there is.

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:46 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:17 pm

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:05 pm

I would argue that there's a difference between being frustrated with the representative and actively seeking to undermine him.

What if that representative is actively undermining conservative principles in this country? Still support him just because (R) or ......?

What is Option B?

Exactly.

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:13 pm

seahawk wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:08 pm At this point, does he even have an agenda? The CDC fiasco would indicate that he's so completely lost that his only agenda is flailing on TV.

Are Republicans talking about trying to get him to resign yet?

His agenda is to stay in power as long as possible.

His agenda is same as it ever was, to see his own face and hear his own voice on TV as much as possible.

To bask in the self assuring glow of his cult rallies.

To reduce otherwise formerly self respecting "conservatives" to self loathing bootlicking sycophants.

The agenda is currently bigly successful!

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 3:00 pm

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:46 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:17 pm
What if that representative is actively undermining conservative principles in this country? Still support him just because (R) or ......?

What is Option B?

Exactly.

I was asking the question sincerely. What is Option B for conservatives?

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 4:36 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 3:00 pm

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:46 pm

What is Option B?

Exactly.

I was asking the question sincerely. What is Option B for conservatives?

#BITFD