Page 3 of 3
Re: Content for content's sake
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2020 9:34 am
by ChalkRocker
I don't know what to believe in anymore...
Re: Content for content's sake
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 1:54 pm
by TDub
Re: Content for content's sake
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 1:56 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
Welp. Ous will be busy getting ready for the deposition now.
Re: Content for content's sake
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 3:01 pm
by ousdahl
I heard about that, and it’s interesting, cuz normally ski resorts absolve themselves of any liability, and are quick to point that out if and when anyone is harmed.
In this case, though, the chair was not in normal functioning order...
Re: Content for content's sake
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 3:18 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
Hope they have enough insurance.
Re: Content for content's sake
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 10:38 pm
by Deleted User 62
They can always plead for a pardon.
What does their political donation ledger look like?
Re: Content for content's sake
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 10:55 pm
by TDub
Wrong board. This one has content.
Re: Content for content's sake
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2020 7:51 am
by ousdahl
sooo what’s up everybody?
anyone have some good content to share?
cuz doing so would make me feel content today.
Re: Content for content's sake
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2020 7:55 am
by pdub
I was having a debate over whether content placement on a web page affects SEO.
A particular client feels it doesn't matter and while Google has come out a few times recently to say it doesn't, ( and it definitely used to within the last few years ), they've also come out and said, 'but be sure to place your most useful content front and center'...so that kind of back peddling leads me to believe you should still place your most relevant content and keywords in the head tag and early on in the body.
I'm pretty positive that if I took the bottom footer content and swapped it with the first visible content of the page, my search rank would be affected.
Painter, you around, any thoughts?
Re: Content for content's sake
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2020 8:04 am
by ousdahl
Just wait until OP realizes you’re posting work stuff in the content thread...
Re: Content for content's sake
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2020 9:05 am
by Shirley
pdub wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2020 7:55 am
I was having a debate over whether content placement on a web page affects SEO.
A particular client feels it doesn't matter and while Google has come out a few times recently to say it doesn't, ( and it definitely used to within the last few years ), they've also come out and said, 'but be sure to place your most useful content front and center'...so that kind of back peddling leads me to believe you should still place your most relevant content and keywords in the head tag and early on in the body.
I'm pretty positive that if I took the bottom footer content and swapped it with the first visible content of the page, my search rank would be affected.
Painter, you around, any thoughts?
I don't know anything about this subject, (so this certainly doesn't deserve "content" status), but ain't nobody looking
below the fold, pdub.
Can't believe you didn't know that.
Re: Content for content's sake
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2020 9:21 am
by pdub
The fold isn't real anymore.
Haven't you heard?