Page 3 of 49

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 1:14 pm
by ousdahl
for the sake of this thread, I’ll start identifying as female.

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 1:18 pm
by Walrus
Feral is a man...

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 1:23 pm
by PhDhawk
Walrus wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 1:18 pm Feral is a man...
She was definitely the man in her relationship with you.

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 2:32 pm
by Deleted User 62
PhDhawk wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 1:23 pm
Walrus wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 1:18 pm Feral is a man...
She was definitely the man in her relationship with you.
Someone had to step up.

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 2:59 pm
by Walrus
Well, it's debatable to argue that Feral is a "man", based on his previous statements. Carry on...

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 3:03 pm
by Walrus
Describes the problem with many on here, and out on the streets with the riots.


Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 3:14 pm
by Deleted User 62
Walrus wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 3:03 pm Describes the problem with many on here, and out on the streets with the riots.

Quite a man crush you have going there....

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 3:15 pm
by twocoach
Walrus wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 3:03 pm Describes the problem with many on here, and out on the streets with the riots.

Too funny. "They don't want to have an intellectual discussion" coming from the side that put Donald Trump in the White House.

And people pay money to hear this guy ramble? I am sure he has a point in there somewhere but he is mostly just free-form babbling. The poor kid that he is answering questions from isn't even aware that he has basically just disagreed with everything he said because his answer was so all over the place.

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 3:17 pm
by Deleted User 62
twocoach wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 3:15 pm
Walrus wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 3:03 pm Describes the problem with many on here, and out on the streets with the riots.

Too funny. "They don't want to have an intellectual discussion" coming from the side that put Donald Trump in the White House.
You lose the case when you put intellectual and Trump in the same sentence.

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 6:50 pm
by ousdahl
I don’t know exactly where this tweet should go, but could we at least investigate just to make sure?



Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 7:05 pm
by Deleted User 318
And now I can't stop laughing about people calling the police on trees.
Likely from a Black Oak. Would never happen if it was White Pine.

Arborist humour.

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2020 11:59 am
by Deleted User 62
NiceDC wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 7:05 pm
And now I can't stop laughing about people calling the police on trees.
Likely from a Black Oak. Would never happen if it was White Pine.

Arborist humour.
POTD

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2020 12:19 pm
by Deleted User 318
Nice!

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2020 12:24 pm
by Walrus
What this case showed is that the real danger facing America is against free speech and the ability to say you disagree with the mob -- not "systemic racism".

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ucla-profess ... er-threats

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2020 1:05 pm
by Deleted User 289
Spoken like a true white man. Can't they both be "real dangers"?
Today, I'll ask on behalf of the family of Elijah McClain. You know, the young man who died for being "suspicious" while Black.

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2020 1:11 pm
by Walrus
You always want to bring this back to skin color. I'm trying to get people to think beyond race to address the real issues.

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2020 1:15 pm
by twocoach
ousdahl wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 6:50 pm I don’t know exactly where this tweet should go, but could we at least investigate just to make sure?


When I lived in Cleveland, there were days where our cars would be coated in Antifa dust. My wife's allergies were so bad I had to hose off her car before she could go to work.

Cleveland sucks.

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2020 1:17 pm
by PhDhawk
Walrus wrote: Fri Jun 26, 2020 1:11 pm You always want to bring this back to skin color. I'm trying to get people to think beyond race to address the real issues.
I think you're right in that this case and the problems in the US at large are bigger and much more complex than just being about race.

But what you're doing is trying to ignore race. That's just as dangerous, if not more so, as making it ONLY about race.

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2020 1:20 pm
by Deleted User 289
Walrus wrote: Fri Jun 26, 2020 1:11 pm You always want to bring this back to skin color. I'm trying to get people to think beyond race to address the real issues.
I'm 100% serious asking this question. Be honest, are you currently on drugs?
I'm asking because this (see below) was YOUR post that I responded to.
"What this case showed is that the real danger facing America is against free speech and the ability to say you disagree with the mob -- not "systemic racism"."

How are you getting people to "think beyond race" when your post includes the words "systemic racism"?

You're god damn right I am going to bring skin color in to a conversation when you want to keep posting shit implying that the color of a person's skin doesn't matter to some/many/most in this country and that racism isn't a problem in this country.

Re: 2020: the year the "feelz" took over

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2020 1:23 pm
by twocoach
Walrus wrote: Fri Jun 26, 2020 12:24 pm What this case showed is that the real danger facing America is against free speech and the ability to say you disagree with the mob -- not "systemic racism".

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ucla-profess ... er-threats
If all African American's lot in life is solely to blame on their attitudes and behaviors as you claim then apply your same logic here you hypocrite. This isn't about free speech; he wasn't arrested for what he stated in his email. Our speech is not free from consequence.

His smart ass response warranted a suspension in my eyes. That was completely unprofessional. College kids try to take advantage of any stupid thing they can think of to get a break in a college exam and have since the creation of college exams. He could have just responded "No, exams will proceed as scheduled" as would be expected of an adult professional, especially one with so much experience. Instead he chose to be a condescending prick and is now dealing with the unpleasant consequences. Are some of the responses just as ridiculous and over the top? Yes and if they escalate to the level of breaking the law then those people should be held responsible for that.

But he is 100% responsible for the situation he finds himself in.