Page 3 of 111

Re: Charges

Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2023 2:29 pm
by jfish26
ousdahl wrote: Sat Mar 18, 2023 9:50 am Image
DOJ smiles.

Re: Charges

Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2023 2:36 pm
by Overlander
Trump so badly wants another Jan 6.

Re: Charges

Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2023 2:42 pm
by Shirley
I think the DOJ is happy about this, too:

Ari Melber's interview with Trump's lawyer Joe Tacopina a couple of days ago is unbelievable.


Re: Charges

Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2023 2:44 pm
by Shirley
Overlander wrote: Sat Mar 18, 2023 2:36 pm Trump so badly wants another Jan 6.
^^^

A failed coup that isn't punished is a dress rehearsal.

Re: Charges

Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2023 3:11 pm
by Overlander
Exactly.
I am confident that vehicles are being loaded, plans are being made, and Trumps dog whistle is going to get louder

Re: Charges

Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2023 4:08 pm
by Shirley
Overlander wrote: Sat Mar 18, 2023 3:11 pm Exactly.
I am confident that vehicles are being loaded, plans are being made, and Trumps dog whistle is going to get louder
There's no doubt.

There's no fucking doubt at all that he will continue to threaten our democracy, and republicans could have helped prevent it but they were and are too craven*.

*craven adjective
cowardly; contemptibly timid; pusillanimous.

noun
a coward.

Re: Charges

Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2023 7:25 pm
by DCHawk1
Turns out, they're hard to distinguish from blocks.

fUcKiNg ReFs!

Re: Charges

Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2023 7:30 pm
by pdub
I don’t like posting in this shit pile of a bored but good job, good post.

Re: Charges

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2023 12:14 pm
by ousdahl

Re: Charges

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2023 2:06 pm
by ousdahl


if I read this right, even his lawyers are in trouble too?

that seems like some pretty deep fraud.

who knew MAGA actually stood for "making attorneys get attorneys"

Re: Charges

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2023 3:26 pm
by KUTradition
is there anything more “trump” than not only being the first president indicted (should it come to fruition), but to have it be the result of a failed cover-up of an affair with a porn star?

slick willy can’t hold a candle…

Re: Charges

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2023 3:36 pm
by ousdahl
And one thing that gets to me if this shit’s for real is, how often is someone afforded the convenience of being afforded a schedule for their arrest?

There’s a Chappelle skit about that, actually.

Shouldn’t the law just bust in and do the arresting on their own terms?

Would anyone be surprised if Trump ends up on some one-way flight to Moscow departing asap?

Re: Charges

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 2:43 pm
by ousdahl

Re: Charges

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 2:50 pm
by ousdahl

Re: Charges

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 4:46 pm
by jfish26
KUTradition wrote: Mon Mar 20, 2023 3:26 pm is there anything more “trump” than not only being the first president indicted (should it come to fruition), but to have it be the result of a failed cover-up of an affair with a porn star?

slick willy can’t hold a candle…
Just the tip (heh) of the iceberg.

Re: Charges

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 5:07 pm
by KUTradition

Re: Charges

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 5:24 pm
by ousdahl
what I don't get is, haven't they been investigating this shit since before Trump was even elected?

How does a grand jury need more time to reconvene at this point?

we're talking shit that went down in fusing 2016...who's investigating this, the NCAA?

Re: Charges

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 8:00 pm
by randylahey
You all realize nothing is going to come from any of this right

Re: Charges

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 8:01 pm
by randylahey
Just George soros funded political fodder

Re: Charges

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 9:41 pm
by jfish26
randylahey wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 8:01 pm Just George soros funded political fodder
Thank you for participating in the Fox talking point one-human centipede, where you swallow talking points whole, shit them out whole, and swallow them right back down.