Our National Health Care Situation
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
Universal healthcare is a winning issue for everyone not voting for chainsaw wielding fascists
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
Yet another bone thrown to capital, but at least with a cute name?KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2023 2:34 pmwhat’s the ACA if not trying to remedy the problem?Back2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2023 2:25 pmyou are both wrong. it's just constant back and forth well yeah but your side nonsense anymore. Health care is so immense, though, everyone gets a piece of the pie.
Wasn’t it like literally written by insurance companies. And shelved an actual universal/single payer option way early on. And sure I think it nixed shit like being dropped for pre-existing conditions, but hasn’t healthcare since the Affordable Care Act become much LESS affordable overall?
Not to mention the whole idea of a law mandating purchase of a free market private sector product.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 6104
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
Name 1 thing that HASN'T become less affordable in that same time span?ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2023 6:08 pmbut hasn’t healthcare since the Affordable Care Act become much LESS affordable overall?KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2023 2:34 pmwhat’s the ACA if not trying to remedy the problem?Back2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2023 2:25 pm
you are both wrong. it's just constant back and forth well yeah but your side nonsense anymore. Health care is so immense, though, everyone gets a piece of the pie.
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
Psych- Every Single Time
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13842
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
i don’t know. go find the answer yourselfousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2023 6:08 pmYet another bone thrown to capital, but at least with a cute name?KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2023 2:34 pmwhat’s the ACA if not trying to remedy the problem?Back2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2023 2:25 pm
you are both wrong. it's just constant back and forth well yeah but your side nonsense anymore. Health care is so immense, though, everyone gets a piece of the pie.
Wasn’t it like literally written by insurance companies. And shelved an actual universal/single payer option way early on. And sure I think it nixed shit like being dropped for pre-existing conditions, but hasn’t healthcare since the Affordable Care Act become much LESS affordable overall?
Not to mention the whole idea of a law mandating purchase of a free market private sector product.
nobody said the efforts were perfect, just that one side was actually making an effort on the healthcare front
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
From the Satellite thread:
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 7:13 pmSo...I know this is an unpopular opinion 'round these parts, but the "A"CA is partly responsible for that.
Before the ACA (as the owner of two businesses but the only "employee" in my state), I bought family insurance on the open market. I had heart surgery in 2009 (and am still eternally grateful to Shirley for the reassurance he provided beforehand) and am, therefore, considered a "high-risk" insuree. I bought a normal family policy for Creamcheese and the kids and a high-risk-pool policy for myself. (38 states had high-risk pools available for people with preexisting conditions before ACA, narrative to the contrary). I paid about $500/month for all of them and about $750/month for myself, $1250 total. Not great, but not bad.
After ACA became law, its preexisting-condition provision ("community pricing") did NOT lower costs for people like me. Instead, it forced underwriters to treat EVERYONE as potentially high-risk. As a result, individual/family rates skyrocketed. Keeping the same coverage would have cost us around $4000/month (an increase of $2750/month, for those of you scoring at home).
Needless to say, we balked at that price. Creamcheese gave up her career as a mom and went back to working for other people, so we could have insurance that didn't cost us almost $50,000/year.
I'm not saying that our old system was great. But the ACA was a sop to the insurance companies and little more. Bipartisan Corporatism is the name of our political game.
Also, for the record, in 2008 John McCain proposed beginning the process of undoing the stupid war-era relic policy that tied health insurance to employment. He was roundly pilloried for doing by EVERYONE. Our health care system is indeed fucked up. The original sin in fucking it up, though, was the war-era policy of wage controls, which made health insurance a fringe benefit that employers could use to lure the best workers.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
Not sure if this is the solution:
US health insurers Humana, Cigna in talks to merge
Nov 29 (Reuters) - U.S. health insurer Cigna (CI.N) is in talks to merge with peer Humana (HUM.N), a source familiar with the matter said on Wednesday, a deal that could exceed $60 billion in value and would be certain to attract fierce antitrust scrutiny.
The discussions come six years after regulators blocked mega-deals that would have consolidated the U.S. health insurance sector.
After U.S. courts upheld antitrust challenges in 2017, Cigna gave up on a $48 billion deal to acquire Anthem -- now known as Elevance Health. Losing the legal battle also caused Aetna -- now owned by pharmacy chain operator CVS Health (CVS.N) -- to abandon a $37 billion deal to acquire Humana.
[...]
US health insurers Humana, Cigna in talks to merge
Nov 29 (Reuters) - U.S. health insurer Cigna (CI.N) is in talks to merge with peer Humana (HUM.N), a source familiar with the matter said on Wednesday, a deal that could exceed $60 billion in value and would be certain to attract fierce antitrust scrutiny.
The discussions come six years after regulators blocked mega-deals that would have consolidated the U.S. health insurance sector.
After U.S. courts upheld antitrust challenges in 2017, Cigna gave up on a $48 billion deal to acquire Anthem -- now known as Elevance Health. Losing the legal battle also caused Aetna -- now owned by pharmacy chain operator CVS Health (CVS.N) -- to abandon a $37 billion deal to acquire Humana.
[...]
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
Derek Cressman
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
Consolidation resulting in fewer co.s selling health insurance would seem to be anti-competitive.
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
Derek Cressman
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
good news they can raise costs even more! and provide less services!
sounds like our taxes. Love it.
Just Ledoux it
- Back2Lawrence
- Posts: 3142
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
The airlines have successfully done this in the last 15 years. But, jobs!
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
we should've never bailed out the airlines. the global shipping needed to remain but we really don't need air travel at the expense of trillions in tax payer money.
If they failed....then fuck it, they fail. I can think of a million other things thay money shouldve or could've gone too.
If they failed....then fuck it, they fail. I can think of a million other things thay money shouldve or could've gone too.
Just Ledoux it
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
Or, if we DO need air travel at the expense of trillions in tax payer money, then maybe we should just nationalize that shit
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
we don't...and absolutely not.
Nationalize air travel?
Absofuckinglutely No.
Nationalize air travel?
Absofuckinglutely No.
Just Ledoux it
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
OK so let’s just keep subsidizing it while they keep cutting services, cutting wages, and buying back stocks. Yaaay invisible hands.
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
did I say I supported that? Pretty sure I just said that was dumb and we should've let them fail?
Just Ledoux it
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
also, for a guy that has spent the last....year? railing against every facet of government and every decision the government has made.....
you sure are eager to hand them control over more and more things.
you sure are eager to hand them control over more and more things.
Just Ledoux it
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
Air travel is a luxury and unnecessary.
It is not a necessity and it is not a human right.
Don't bail it out, don't subsidize it, don't artificially keep it afloat, and for fucks sake for sure don't nationalize it.
It is not a necessity and it is not a human right.
Don't bail it out, don't subsidize it, don't artificially keep it afloat, and for fucks sake for sure don't nationalize it.
Just Ledoux it
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
How about nationalizing healthcare, then?
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
Do you read anything posted or do you just post random shit then attempt spin things around into an I gotcha?
If you been reading and following along then you already have my answer.
If you been reading and following along then you already have my answer.
Just Ledoux it
Re: Our National Health Care Situation
Well, a big reason I don’t trust the gummint much is because instead of the gummint making things like healthcare or transportation better for our nation, we put most of our resources toward bombs instead.