Page 21 of 41
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2023 5:33 pm
by jfish26
pdub wrote: ↑Mon Jan 02, 2023 5:03 pm
No. I did post about it on kcrim though.
Again, sure. But I do not get the sense that our Foxbrain friends limit their kvetching over this to this fine internet establishment.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2023 5:35 pm
by jfish26
pdub wrote: ↑Mon Jan 02, 2023 5:32 pm
I don’t agree with no smoking restrictions from anything above the city level. I’d prefer to let the establishments decide.
I’ll personally go to the spots where it isn’t allowed and I’d expect most would do the same but that should be up to the business owner.
I agree with this, for truly private (and self-supporting) businesses. Once you start taking public development incentives or other taxpayer funds, I think the situation might change.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2023 5:46 pm
by DCHawk1
zsn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 02, 2023 5:09 pm
Explain to me how masking in public places is any different than no-smoking restaurants, public spaces and public transports, other than one requiring an act and the other preventing an act. But mah rights, right?
Btw, I’m one of about 50-70% of people in my area wearing a mask in stores. If it drops my susceptibility even a little it’s worth the apparent inconvenience. While it’s not as high as from other people masking it’s still something.
LOL
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2023 8:51 pm
by randylahey
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2023 9:15 pm
by DCHawk1
PDub suspending Lobster was prophetic.
Thank Gaia.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2023 9:31 pm
by randylahey
I find it surprising that nobody has really brought up the whole epstein pedophilia sex trafficking ring up in conspiracies yet
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2023 9:31 pm
by randylahey
Especially with all the ties to the political elite
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2023 10:24 pm
by Mjl
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 02, 2023 9:15 pm
PDub suspending Lobster was prophetic.
Thank Gaia.
Lobster saying pdub is such a bad parent that he sent his kid to the emergency room was predictable?
I gotta say I didn't see that exact thing coming. Or anything
that douchey.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2023 10:26 pm
by Mjl
randylahey wrote: ↑Mon Jan 02, 2023 9:31 pm
I find it surprising that nobody has really brought up the whole epstein pedophilia sex trafficking ring up in conspiracies yet
See that's the thing where conspiracy nuts are so frustrating. It makes actual conspiracies like that one get mostly ignored because they get lumped in with the crazy ones.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2023 6:16 am
by randylahey
Mjl wrote: ↑Mon Jan 02, 2023 10:26 pm
randylahey wrote: ↑Mon Jan 02, 2023 9:31 pm
I find it surprising that nobody has really brought up the whole epstein pedophilia sex trafficking ring up in conspiracies yet
See that's the thing where conspiracy nuts are so frustrating. It makes actual conspiracies like that one get mostly ignored because they get lumped in with the crazy ones.
Ironically this one is no conspiracy. There is hard evidence everywhere that is largely ignored. Then the man behind it all is set to testify in court and suddenly "commits suicide"
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2023 6:33 am
by randylahey
Now there is a damar Hamlin conspiracy. I dont personally beleive this, but apparently there is a documentary called "died suddenly." I haven't seen it, but the idea is what happened to Hamlin has happened to others who have been vaccinated. Apparently there's several soccer players used as examples. Young healthy athletes who just mysteriously died suddenly
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2023 6:33 am
by pdub
I’m not certain exactly when DC posted that bc I haven’t fixed time stamps but if he is referring to the sadly predictable swarm of Stayrandys on Twitter linking a NFL athletes injury to the vaccine then yes, thank Gaia.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2023 6:34 am
by pdub
Holy shit.
Prophetic.
And if you would like to join your boy, continue talking about this theory.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2023 6:38 am
by randylahey
pdub wrote: ↑Tue Jan 03, 2023 6:34 am
Holy shit.
Prophetic.
And if you would like to join your boy, continue talking about this theory.
I literally said I didn't think it. I think he just had a freak of nature injury. But, we've never seen anything like it
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2023 6:41 am
by pdub
Yes we have.
Plenty of athletes before 2020 have collapsed playing a sport, many related to heart conditions.
Just stop.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2023 6:46 am
by randylahey
pdub wrote: ↑Tue Jan 03, 2023 6:41 am
Yes we have.
Plenty of athletes before 2020 have collapsed playing a sport, many related to heart conditions.
Just stop.
I've ever seen a football game stopped cause a guys life was in the balance. Have you?
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2023 6:48 am
by pdub
Welp.
Hope you two meet on 4Chan and figure out why you’re in timeout.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2023 7:37 am
by ousdahl
jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 02, 2023 2:46 pm
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Mon Jan 02, 2023 2:23 pm
there are roughly 13 contributors to this forum. half pretend to be experts in the field. color me skeptical.
I am DYING to know which contributor pretends to be an expert 50% of the time, but not the other 50% of the time. Or is it that that particular contributor is 50% pretending to be an expert, at all times?
Boggles the mind, it does.
there's a donut joke in there somewhere
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2023 7:38 am
by ousdahl
oh, found it!
ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Dec 23, 2022 11:10 am
The mainstream media didn’t predict this.
And yet, we had a thread that predicted this.
The sticker on the box even predicted this.
it’s so obviously obvious
Wake up sheeple!
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2023 8:54 am
by jfish26
ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Jan 03, 2023 7:37 am
jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 02, 2023 2:46 pm
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Mon Jan 02, 2023 2:23 pm
there are roughly 13 contributors to this forum. half pretend to be experts in the field. color me skeptical.
I am DYING to know which contributor pretends to be an expert 50% of the time, but not the other 50% of the time. Or is it that that particular contributor is 50% pretending to be an expert, at all times?
Boggles the mind, it does.
there's a donut joke in there somewhere
A flute with no holes…