Page 21 of 29
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 3:22 pm
by DCHawk1
NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 2:58 pm
TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 2:29 pm
is it wrong of me to hope it’s brady?
Noticed that a lot of people said it's within 30 minutes of a certain person's private golf club. And Kraft and said person are friends.
THAT would be awesome.
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 5:27 pm
by Deleted User 62
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 3:22 pm
NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 2:58 pm
TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 2:29 pm
is it wrong of me to hope it’s brady?
Noticed that a lot of people said it's within 30 minutes of a certain person's private golf club. And Kraft and said person are friends.
THAT would be awesome.
Kraft, Brady....Trump?
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 5:34 pm
by Cascadia
Tiger Woods?
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 9:37 pm
by DCHawk1
I don't want to get greedy, but "All of the Above."
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 2:50 pm
by jfish26
I enjoyed all of this.
https://deadspin.com/i-cant-wait-to-see ... 1832823856
Official law enforcement is only one of Kraft’s problems, though, and for his grade of billionaire asshole, it might actually be the lesser of them. He’ll also likely have a reckoning with America’s bumblingest dick-tripping clown judiciary, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell’s league office. You can be sure that’s gonna be a big ol’ exploding-port-a-john type of deal.
If there’s no particularly good way for the commissioner’s office of a sports league to adjudicate prostitution—and there isn’t!—there are any number of bad ways. You may be thinking that seems like a compelling argument for the league office to stay the hell out of this. You’re right! However, the single defining claim of Goodell’s tenure as commissioner is that the league office must litigate each and every instance of lawbreaking by anybody even interpretively connected to the league. Well, here you go.
[...]
I suspect the players’ union might raise a collective eyebrow at any hesitation to act in this case.
Moreover, of all the owners to get busted with his dick (not even all that figuratively) out, Kraft makes probably the worst test case for Goodell quietly leaving the ol’ My First U.S. Marshal Badge in his desk drawer. Kraft, by dint of the Patriots’ unprecedented dominance over the past two decades, may well be the single most powerful individual in the NFL, which would make him one of the most powerful people in American sports. The story of his involvement in a prostitution and human-trafficking bust, even if only as a john, will be the biggest NFL story for some time to come.
[...]
Please note that I absolutely am not calling for Goodell to do anything at all to punish Kraft for his involvement in this. Properly speaking, this is none of the league office’s business at this point, or possibly ever, just like any number of off-the-field player incidents also have been none of Goodell’s business. I am just saying that whatever he does, you can be sure it will be stupid, and bad, and will make things worse, and many people will have good reason to call him a fucking idiot for it. This is gonna rule.
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:15 pm
by Deleted User 183
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:47 pm
by Cascadia
I’ll admit, that’s funny
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 3:39 pm
by pdub
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2019 4:29 pm
by NewtonHawk11
Reid mentioned today at combine that Berry will NOT have surgery on his ankle/foot this offseason and is planning on attending all offseason events.
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:04 am
by jfish26
Based on the (very little) information we have, it would seem best to let him go on June 1.
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:16 am
by pdub
If you could get anything decent for Justin Houston ( 2nd or 3rd rounder? ) at this point, I'd think you would take it just to free cap.
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:51 pm
by NewtonHawk11
jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:04 am
Based on the (very little) information we have, it would seem best to let him go on June 1.
I heard somewhere from a Chiefs reporter that there is really no savings in letting Berry go. He said something along the lines of there is not that much difference from releasing him compared to keeping him. Based off of dead cap numbers for 2019 and 2020 or something like that. Don't remember the exact scenario, but it's something like that. So he thinks KC will keep him
Houston however is a different story. He's either going to be released or traded. KC will be lucky to get a 4th for him because KC will likely release him if not traded.
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:22 pm
by jfish26
NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:51 pm
jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:04 am
Based on the (very little) information we have, it would seem best to let him go on June 1.
I heard somewhere from a Chiefs reporter that there is really no savings in letting Berry go. He said something along the lines of there is not that much difference from releasing him compared to keeping him. Based off of dead cap numbers for 2019 and 2020 or something like that. Don't remember the exact scenario, but it's something like that. So he thinks KC will keep him
Houston however is a different story. He's either going to be released or traded. KC will be lucky to get a 4th for him because KC will likely release him if not traded.
You only save $1.55 million or so. Not a lot.
But I don't think, from a football standpoint, you can tolerate the will-he-or-won't-he stuff any more.
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 4:14 pm
by vmlb
Every team, every week, has a few "will he or won't he" players to deal with
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 9:16 am
by NewtonHawk11
jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:22 pm
NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:51 pm
jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:04 am
Based on the (very little) information we have, it would seem best to let him go on June 1.
I heard somewhere from a Chiefs reporter that there is really no savings in letting Berry go. He said something along the lines of there is not that much difference from releasing him compared to keeping him. Based off of dead cap numbers for 2019 and 2020 or something like that. Don't remember the exact scenario, but it's something like that. So he thinks KC will keep him
Houston however is a different story. He's either going to be released or traded. KC will be lucky to get a 4th for him because KC will likely release him if not traded.
You only save $1.55 million or so. Not a lot.
But I don't think, from a football standpoint, you can tolerate the will-he-or-won't-he stuff any more.
But I think the will he is much better than any player in the defensive secondary.
But if doesn't go, Watts, Sorensen, Lucas and Murray could all be suitable replacements.
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 9:28 am
by CrimsonNBlue
I know there is no WAR statistic in the NFL (that I'm aware), but if there was, the NFL's 0.0 replacement player is a lot better than most people would think.
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 12:03 pm
by Deleted User 62
Gutter wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:15 pm
JFC, is there a camera, anywhere, that The Rock isn't in front of?
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 11:34 am
by Cascadia
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2019 10:42 am
by vmlb
Franchise tag on Ford. What kind of pick can they get in trade?
Re: NFL 2018
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:31 am
by CrimsonNBlue
vmlb wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 10:42 am
Franchise tag on Ford. What kind of pick can they get in trade?
Hopefully one that has had Lasik.