Re: Where's the petri dish thread?
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2020 3:41 pm
Haha maybe so
All Things Kansas.
https://www.kansascrimson.com/boards/
Not out of the woods yet, but this is part of the reason I hope mask practice extends beyond COVID during flu season.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 6:50 pm There will be some positives out of this whole thing, hard to see now, but there will:
I've felt Americans seem kinda lax comparatively on personal sanitation and have generally been ignorant about contagion.
And, not that it is limited to the US. I've read anecdotal stories from countries in Asia where it seems the cases of common cold and flu are down this spring. Could just be a resource thing, but social distancing and handwashing may be having good collateral effects.
This.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 10:05 am i’m not excusing her, or any of the other “medical professionals” that were involved in “warp speed”
but, theirs was an incredibly difficult place to be, balancing their hypocratic oath with trying to stay in a position where they could do the most good
trump would have quickly replaced any of them with a more craven, sycophant
it was an incredibly difficult hand they were dealt
There’s a nuance here. The bolder part only applies to us mere mortals who have no recourse and would be in dire straits if we lose our job. At the level of Drs Birx, Fauci, Redlener et al they would in fact have better opportunities because they spoke truth to power.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:34 amThis.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 10:05 am i’m not excusing her, or any of the other “medical professionals” that were involved in “warp speed”
but, theirs was an incredibly difficult place to be, balancing their hypocratic oath with trying to stay in a position where they could do the most good
trump would have quickly replaced any of them with a more craven, sycophant
it was an incredibly difficult hand they were dealt
It's really easy to say, "I'd have done X, if I were her"
The president of the US, no matter who it is, is not a person that you just tell to fuck off.
Most of us wimp out around our bosses who don't wield nearly the same authority, nor are they vindictive megalomaniacs like Trump.
I'm not going to praise her for anything, but I'm not gonna demonize her for failing to do more either, knowing good and well 99% of people wouldn't have done any more than she did.
Yes, and I wish they would have.zsn wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 3:54 pmThere’s a nuance here. The bolder part only applies to us mere mortals who have no recourse and would be in dire straits if we lose our job. At the level of Drs Birx, Fauci, Redlener et al they would in fact have better opportunities because they spoke truth to power.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:34 amThis.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 10:05 am i’m not excusing her, or any of the other “medical professionals” that were involved in “warp speed”
but, theirs was an incredibly difficult place to be, balancing their hypocratic oath with trying to stay in a position where they could do the most good
trump would have quickly replaced any of them with a more craven, sycophant
it was an incredibly difficult hand they were dealt
It's really easy to say, "I'd have done X, if I were her"
The president of the US, no matter who it is, is not a person that you just tell to fuck off.
Most of us wimp out around our bosses who don't wield nearly the same authority, nor are they vindictive megalomaniacs like Trump.
I'm not going to praise her for anything, but I'm not gonna demonize her for failing to do more either, knowing good and well 99% of people wouldn't have done any more than she did.
However, as Trad said their logic may be the legitimate concern that someone like Atlas or the My Pillow guy might replace them.
What's the difference between this and things like PHYRE, 3dpssm, and Raptor X that are already available?TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 3:23 pm this could literally be a game changer when it comes to drug and therapy designs
https://nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01968-y
speed and specificity?PhDhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 3:30 pmWhat's the difference between this and things like PHYRE, 3dpssm, and Raptor X that are already available?TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 3:23 pm this could literally be a game changer when it comes to drug and therapy designs
https://nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01968-y
They're open sourced, I'm not sure that they use AI.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 3:41 pmspeed and specificity?PhDhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 3:30 pmWhat's the difference between this and things like PHYRE, 3dpssm, and Raptor X that are already available?TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 3:23 pm this could literally be a game changer when it comes to drug and therapy designs
https://nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01968-y
i’d honestly gave to look more closely at them all, but i’d assume that the two new AI technologies have outperformed those that you cited in the relevant competitions (presuming they participated in those or similar competitions)
are those other three open source as well?
from what i’ve read, at least with AlphaFold, it does a much better job of replicating the results of x-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy, but does so with a fraction of the time and cost
completely agreePhDhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 3:54 pmThey're open sourced, I'm not sure that they use AI.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 3:41 pmspeed and specificity?
i’d honestly gave to look more closely at them all, but i’d assume that the two new AI technologies have outperformed those that you cited in the relevant competitions (presuming they participated in those or similar competitions)
are those other three open source as well?
from what i’ve read, at least with AlphaFold, it does a much better job of replicating the results of x-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy, but does so with a fraction of the time and cost
I just don't know how you can trust a computer derived 3d structure de novo.
I mean, I think it's great for, let's say the spike protein on the coronavirus, which has been crystalyzed gets another mutation and you want to see how that changes the protein structure...that's great, you have a REAL structure to start with, the computer gives you the most likely structure based on changing 1 or a few amino acids. Fast, cheap, reliable. On the other hand, lets say there's a new pathogen that shows up tomorrow and they want to determine the structure of a completely novel protein...sorry, but I'm only going to put so much trust into a structural prediction, until it gets its structure determined experimentally.
in a sense i agree with you, but when the end product is a drug or antibody therapy that you’re injecting/ingesting, i think a lot of people would want experimental supporting evidence