Page 22 of 62

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:45 pm
by Geezer
The audit was more bullshit from Trump.

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:50 pm
by dolomite
Geezer wrote: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:45 pm The audit was more bullshit from Trump.
Proof, link?

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:55 pm
by Shirley

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 1:28 pm
by DCHawk1
I don't believe this shit.

I was assured when Trump was elected that the republic was dead!

How is this possible?

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 1:38 pm
by zsn
DCHawk1 wrote: Sun Mar 17, 2019 1:28 pm I don't believe this shit.

I was assured when Trump was elected that the republic was dead!

How is this possible?
In the immortal words of Miracle Max........"[the republic]....is only mostly dead" :)

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 2:47 pm
by DCHawk1
But...but...but...Trumphitler!

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 2:49 pm
by defixione
More like Trumpmagoo.

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:39 pm
by DCHawk1
I swear, that's not what I was told.

At the risk of being culturally insensitive, I kinda feel ripped off.

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:05 am
by Deleted User 89
wow...

https://www.newsweek.com/jared-kushner- ... ls-1371897

and ivanka using personal emails for govt work?

could they be any dumber? particularly after the clinton email bs...

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:13 am
by ousdahl
Isn’t this the same shit that DC wanted the FBI to lock up Cankles for?

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:41 am
by Deleted User 89
seems worse, but what do i know...

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:51 am
by DCHawk1
ousdahl wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:13 am Isn’t this the same shit that DC wanted the FBI to lock up Cankles for?
link?

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:52 am
by Deleted User 62
Ivanka said it was ok...so....it's ok.

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:54 am
by DCHawk1
jeepinjayhawk wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:52 am Ivanka said it was ok...so....it's ok.
ewe Kant reid?

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:55 am
by Deleted User 62
DCHawk1 wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:54 am
jeepinjayhawk wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:52 am Ivanka said it was ok...so....it's ok.
ewe Kant reid?
It's so cute when you do that.

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:58 am
by DCHawk1
Make fun of you for not being able (or willing) to read?

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 11:14 am
by Deleted User 62
Oh no, it's crazy cool that you do that.

But, it is too bad that you are referencing an article that I wasn't commenting on.

That is the danger you run of constantly trying to prove that you are the smartest guy in the room.

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:16 pm
by Shirley
Oh good, one of DC's heroes, and one of the architects of republican Gov. Sam Brownback's "economic experiment" in Kansas, that was by any objective measure a calamitous failure, is being nominated for the Fed? Considering Trump is nominating him, this makes perfect sense. smfh

President Donald Trump says he will nominate Stephen Moore, a prominent conservative economist, to fill a vacancy on the Federal Reserve’s seven-member board.

Moore served as an economic adviser to Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign, helping to draft Trump’s tax cut plan...

The other person involved in designing Brownback's economic failure was Arthur Laffer, he of "Trickle Down Economics" fame, who helped Reagan nearly triple America's national debt.

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:56 pm
by DCHawk1
jeepinjayhawk wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 11:14 am Oh no, it's crazy cool that you do that.

But, it is too bad that you are referencing an article that I wasn't commenting on.

That is the danger you run of constantly trying to prove that you are the smartest guy in the room.
So...when you wrote "Ivanka said it was ok...so....it's ok," you weren't commenting on the article about Ivanka?

Weird.

That is danger you run of being dipshit.

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 1:00 pm
by DCHawk1
Feral wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:16 pm
The other person involved in designing Brownback's economic failure was Arthur Laffer, he of "Trickle Down Economics" fame,
I'm certain Plano will be along any minute to explain to me that when you wrote "Laffer, he of "Trickle Down Economics" fame," that you weren't referring to that Art Laffer, but "trickle-down" has nothing to do with Laffer. He didn't use the term. He certainly didn't apply it to supply-side theory or Reaganomics.

You must have him confused with the other Art Laffer, the one named David Stockman.

And BTW, Steve is not my hero.