Page 22 of 42
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:21 pm
by Mjl
sdoyel wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:18 pm
Why is that hypocritical? They don't use fetal tissue from fetuses over six weeks old for stem cells AFAIK
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 12:17 am
by zsn
So 41 days in it’s ok to harvest, the next morning it’s murder. Got it.
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 6:22 am
by Deleted User 887
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 6:24 am
by Deleted User 887
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:23 am
by ousdahl
Mjl wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:21 pm
sdoyel wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:18 pm
Why is that hypocritical? They don't use fetal tissue from fetuses over six weeks old for stem cells AFAIK
because the whole “life begins at erection” thing
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:23 am
by ousdahl
wait, so much for life beginning at erection
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:07 am
by sdoyel
I’m pro-choice & pro-life.
I'm pro-Barbara who found out at her 20 week anatomy scan that the infant she had been so excited to bring into this world had developed without life sustaining organs.
I'm pro-Susan who was sexually assaulted on her way home from work, only to come to the horrific realization that her assailant planted his seed in her when she got a positive pregnancy test result a month later.
I'm pro-Theresa who hemorrhaged due to a placental abruption, causing her parents, spouse, and children to have to make the impossible decision on whether to save her or her unborn child.
I'm pro-little Cathy who had her innocence ripped away from her by someone she should have been able to trust and her 11 year old body isn't mature enough to bear the consequence of that betrayal.
I'm pro-Melissa who's working two jobs just to make ends meet and has to choose between bringing another child into poverty or feeding the children she already has because her spouse walked out on her. (Maybe one of those is a minimum wage job at Hobby Lobby, and she can't afford birth control because her employer went to the Supreme Court to make sure her insurance plan doesn't cover it.)
I'm pro-Brittany who realizes that she is in no way financially, emotionally, or physically able to raise a child.
I'm pro-Emily who went through IVF, ending up with SIX viable implanted eggs requiring selective reduction in order to ensure the safety of her and a SAFE amount of fetuses.
I'm pro-Jessica who is FINALLY getting the strength to get away from her physically abusive spouse only to find out that she is carrying the monster's child.
I'm pro-Vanessa who went into her confirmation appointment after YEARS of trying to conceive only to hear silence where there should be a heartbeat.
I'm pro-Lindsay who lost her virginity in her sophomore year with a broken condom and now has to choose whether to be a teenage mom or just a teenager.
I'm pro-Courtney who just found out she's already 13 weeks along, but the egg never made it out of her fallopian tube so either she terminates the pregnancy or risks dying from internal bleeding.
Pro-Renee who developed eclampsia and in her third trimester had to terminate her pregnancy or else she and her much loved baby would die.
Also pro-Lorraine who found out two weeks before her due date that her baby’s heart wasn’t beating anymore, and had to be induced so she wouldn’t develop a life threatening infection.
You can argue and say that I'm pro-choice all you want, but the truth is: I'm pro-life.
Their lives.
Women's lives.
You don't get to pick and choose which scenarios should be accepted.
It's not about which stories you don't agree with. It's about fighting for the women in the stories that and the CHOICE that was made for them, by them.
Women's rights are meant to protect ALL women, regardless of their situation - or how big their bank account is. Because, let's face it, rich people's daughters (yes, even the ones who voted for anti-abortion bills) will always be able to find safe abortions.
They did before Roe v Wade. Most poor women will still get abortions too, whether from centuries old, unsafe home methods or from opportunistic untrained, unsafe people. Roe v. Wade didn't create abortion. It ended poor, desperate women dying from them.
#roevwade #prochoice #womensrights
*Copied and pasted*
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:18 am
by Deleted User 902
ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:23 am
Mjl wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:21 pm
sdoyel wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:18 pm
Why is that hypocritical? They don't use fetal tissue from fetuses over six weeks old for stem cells AFAIK
because the whole “life begins at erection” thing
Just genocide.
"The average male will produce roughly 525 billion sperm cells over a lifetime and shed at least one billion of them per month. A healthy adult male can release between 40 million and 1.2 billion sperm cells in a single ejaculation."
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:19 am
by ousdahl
wait Ben, which is which?
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:24 am
by Deleted User 902
I always find it funny that the far right take such hardline positions that have 20-30 point age gaps for those who are going to be eligible for their first election to those who will be voting in their last. Stop pandering to racist grandpa and start pandering to woke Jesse.
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:27 am
by jfish26
dub needs a codpiece wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:24 am
I always find it funny that the far right take such hardline positions that have 20-30 point age gaps for those who are going to be eligible for their first election to those who will be voting in their last. Stop pandering to racist grandpa and start pandering to woke Jesse.
But this explains the desperate inside straight draw (in the form of cementing minority rule before the massive unpopularity of their positions finally catches up with them at the ballot box).
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:29 am
by Deleted User 902
So, apartheid
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:35 am
by jfish26
But, with a smile!
(if you're white)
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:42 am
by Deleted User 902
So, Apartheid
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:45 am
by jfish26
Fair enough.
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 10:06 am
by ousdahl
dub needs a codpiece wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:18 am
ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:23 am
Mjl wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:21 pm
Why is that hypocritical? They don't use fetal tissue from fetuses over six weeks old for stem cells AFAIK
because the whole “life begins at erection” thing
Just genocide.
"The average male will produce roughly 525 billion sperm cells over a lifetime and shed at least one billion of them per month. A healthy adult male can release between 40 million and 1.2 billion sperm cells in a single ejaculation."
A single sperm has 37.5 MB of DNA information. That means a typical ejaculation represents a data transfer of something like 1,587.5 TB of info.
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 10:54 am
by japhy
ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 10:06 am
dub needs a codpiece wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:18 am
ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:23 am
because the whole “life begins at erection” thing
Just genocide.
"The average male will produce roughly 525 billion sperm cells over a lifetime and shed at least one billion of them per month. A healthy adult male can release between 40 million and 1.2 billion sperm cells in a single ejaculation."
A single sperm has 37.5 MB of DNA information. That means a typical ejaculation represents a data transfer of something like 1,587.5 TB of info.
This explains the error message we keep getting saying Annie's hard drive is full.
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 11:01 am
by Mjl
ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:23 am
Mjl wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:21 pm
sdoyel wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:18 pm
Why is that hypocritical? They don't use fetal tissue from fetuses over six weeks old for stem cells AFAIK
because the whole “life begins at erection” thing
You said that. The law he signed says it's 6 weeks. So you are saying it's hypocritical by projecting your own thoughts onto him.
One Illy is enough.
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 11:06 am
by ousdahl
The law says 6 weeks, but the Catholic Church says that’s still not enough.
“Life begins at erection” is a satirical play on words of their actual mantra, “life begins at conception.”
And any fetal tissue anything, if I recall, is a hard no from the church.
Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to enter private browsing mode to, uh, transfer some data.
Re: Where's the Pro-Life thread?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2021 11:07 am
by Deleted User 902
ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 11:06 am
The law says 6 weeks, but the Catholic Church says that’s still not enough.
“Life begins at erection” is a satirical play on words of their actual mantra, “life begins at conception.”
Knock it off Olly-Q.