Page 22 of 60
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2022 8:47 am
by MICHHAWK
outside of the few fanatics, no one cares what dt is up to these days.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:14 am
by jfish26
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 8:47 am
outside of the few fanatics, no one cares what dt is up to these days.
Few fanatics = 1/3 of the country.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2022 10:17 am
by Overlander
jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:14 am
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 8:47 am
outside of the few fanatics, no one cares what dt is up to these days.
Few fanatics = 1/3 of the country.
The dangerous 1/3
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2022 10:33 am
by ProudBoy
Trump just texted me. He’s laughing his ass off after pulling the wool over the eyes of the WH archivists. He swears there are probably twice as many documents he tore up that they never found. He also said those in charge of the National Archives can go fuck themselves.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 9:24 am
by sdoyel
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 11:25 am
by sdoyel
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 11:37 am
by jfish26
sdoyel wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 11:25 am
Also, my god, the dog whistling.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 11:47 am
by twocoach
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 8:47 am
outside of the few fanatics, no one cares what dt is up to these days.
It's scary that you think this is accurate.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:19 pm
by KUTradition
fortunately, Jackson has already been through a number of confirmation hearings (one in the past year, if i’m not mistaken). i’m sure she’s well aware of what’s coming down the pipe
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:21 pm
by jfish26
KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:19 pm
fortunately, Jackson has already been through a number of confirmation hearings (one in the past year, if i’m not mistaken). i’m sure she’s well aware of what’s coming down the pipe
I'm making popcorn for the portion of the proceedings where people who raised no objections to her appointment to the DC Circuit (by which time she was OBVIOUSLY on the D short list for SCOTUS) are all of the sudden "deeply troubled" by or "have real questions about" her candidacy for SCOTUS.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:26 pm
by KUTradition
jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:21 pm
KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:19 pm
fortunately, Jackson has already been through a number of confirmation hearings (one in the past year, if i’m not mistaken). i’m sure she’s well aware of what’s coming down the pipe
I'm making popcorn for the portion of the proceedings where people who raised no objections to her appointment to the DC Circuit (by which time she was OBVIOUSLY on the D short list for SCOTUS) are all of the sudden "deeply troubled" by or "have real questions about" her candidacy for SCOTUS.
right? it’ll be awful curious to see who among the pubs all of a sudden does an about-face
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 6:12 pm
by sdoyel
Lindsey Graham for starters.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 6:50 pm
by Overlander
sdoyel wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 6:12 pm
Lindsey Graham for starters.
The ultimate “hi, how am I?” Guy
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 7:05 pm
by Qusdahl
sdoyel wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 11:25 am
At least he IS reviewing the nomination tho…progress?
Wait, nm, that’s not it.
#senateminorityleaderproblems
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 7:07 pm
by Qusdahl
I imagine Mitch’ll dig like hell for skeletons in her closet too
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 7:12 am
by KUTradition
sdoyel wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 6:12 pm
Lindsey Graham for starters.
on queue: win for the radical left
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 1:24 pm
by Cascadia
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 1:41 pm
by jfish26
Embarrassing. And, should be disqualifying.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 2:26 pm
by twocoach
Watching the GOP try to pin some sort of disqualifying item on Jackson has been comical. She continues to deftly brush them off to the side like the irrelevant gnats they are. She seems to be eminently qualified and reasonable.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 3:58 pm
by Deleted User 863
twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Mar 22, 2022 2:26 pm
Watching the GOP try to pin some sort of disqualifying item on Jackson has been comical. She continues to deftly brush them off to the side like the irrelevant gnats they are. She seems to be eminently qualified and reasonable.
I like her.