Kansas Crimson

This rhymes with the dumbass logic of pointing to increased drug seizures at the border as evidence that border security is worsening.

my thought exactly

randy tries so hard, though…A for effort

randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 7:49 am If this was said about Trump it would he the number one story of the week. Politics is shady

I know I am an idiot but I'm overly confused as to what your intention was in sharing this.
I assume you realize/d the article is/was from wnd.com
Is my assumption correct?
If so, do you have any clue about what wnd.com is?
P.S. I also assume you know why Larry Elder shared that. If not, when people click on the link/article what do they see on the "front page" of the site? I'll give you a hint. Who may (or may not) run for President in 2024?

jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 11:41 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 7:49 am If this was said about Trump it would he the number one story of the week. Politics is shady

Let’s play Exercises in Critical Thinking.

Here are a couple things in the linked article, that would make a rational person question the reliability of the source:

Leonardo DiCaprio testified in federal court last week that fugitive Malaysian fraudster Low Taek Jho, better known as Jho Low, wanted to donate tens of millions of dollars to the Democrats during Barack Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.

He explained DiCaprio told a federal court, in a hearing at which "fugitive Malaysian fraudster Low Taek Jho" was mentioned, how the wanted man discussed his idea to donate the huge sum to Democrats that year.

“wanted to” and “idea” - so, this didn’t happen. This rhymes with the dumbass logic of pointing to increased drug seizures at the border as evidence that border security is worsening.

Montgomery pointed out that for comparison, "the total amount spent by the government of Russia in their microscopic Facebook 'interference' case of 2016 was just $150,000, though the U.S. government managed to spend in excess of $32 million investigating the matter."

Lol - this dumbass, minimizing whataboutism tells you what you need to know about the source’s bias.

I'm aware. And its happened a million times Trump too lol and its always the top story of the month

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 11:53 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 7:49 am If this was said about Trump it would he the number one story of the week. Politics is shady

I know I am an idiot but I'm overly confused as to what your intention was in sharing this.
I assume you realize/d the article is/was from wnd.com
Is my assumption correct?
If so, do you have any clue about what wnd.com is?

People not afraid to tell the TRUTH, don’tcha know.

Everytime Trump takes a shit the mainstream media reports on how bad it smells. The point has nothing to do with the article or anything. Its all in the coverage. If a famous celebrity had revealed that conversation about Trump, it would be everywhere

randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 11:55 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 11:41 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 7:49 am If this was said about Trump it would he the number one story of the week. Politics is shady

Let’s play Exercises in Critical Thinking.

Here are a couple things in the linked article, that would make a rational person question the reliability of the source:

Leonardo DiCaprio testified in federal court last week that fugitive Malaysian fraudster Low Taek Jho, better known as Jho Low, wanted to donate tens of millions of dollars to the Democrats during Barack Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.

He explained DiCaprio told a federal court, in a hearing at which "fugitive Malaysian fraudster Low Taek Jho" was mentioned, how the wanted man discussed his idea to donate the huge sum to Democrats that year.

“wanted to” and “idea” - so, this didn’t happen. This rhymes with the dumbass logic of pointing to increased drug seizures at the border as evidence that border security is worsening.

Montgomery pointed out that for comparison, "the total amount spent by the government of Russia in their microscopic Facebook 'interference' case of 2016 was just $150,000, though the U.S. government managed to spend in excess of $32 million investigating the matter."

Lol - this dumbass, minimizing whataboutism tells you what you need to know about the source’s bias.

I'm aware. And its happened a million times Trump too lol and its always the top story of the month

You ASSume it would have been. It seems more likely that the top stories of the month will continue to be about how Trump is being investigated for countless different felonies. I doubt a story about how a rich fraudster claiming that he wanted to donate more money to Trump than allowed would overshadow what is going on, which is far more serious than such a petty story.

I don’t think it’s any coincidence that this story - which touches on so many pet MAGA scarifications - is coming out as the feds zoom in on fraudulent, grifty Trump fundraising.

any “story” linking/citing breitbart is totally above bored and of the purest of intentions

The state of NY.... and yet the DA finds it more important to worry about Trump and things that happened 7 years ago

randylahey wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 2:41 pm The state of NY.... and yet the DA finds it more important to worry about Trump and things that happened 7 years ago

Hey, look over there!

Dude, the Russians spent millions co-opting the NRA who funneled that money into Trump's campaign. And that was without the oligarch contributions.

randylahey wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 2:41 pm The state of NY.... and yet the DA finds it more important to worry about Trump and things that happened 7 years ago

I’m so glad that the Feds didn’t take this “Whitey Bulger never killed anyone in the last 7 years” approach.

randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 11:58 am Everytime Trump takes a shit the mainstream media reports on how bad it smells. The point has nothing to do with the article or anything. Its all in the coverage. If a famous celebrity had revealed that conversation about Trump, it would be everywhere

Randall is a trumpertarian.

japhy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 4:09 pm

randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 11:58 am Everytime Trump takes a shit the mainstream media reports on how bad it smells. The point has nothing to do with the article or anything. Its all in the coverage. If a famous celebrity had revealed that conversation about Trump, it would be everywhere

Randall is a trumpertarian.

no, no, no! he’s a libertarian, i tell ya!

(allegedly)

KUTradition wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 4:12 pm

japhy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 4:09 pm

randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 11:58 am Everytime Trump takes a shit the mainstream media reports on how bad it smells. The point has nothing to do with the article or anything. Its all in the coverage. If a famous celebrity had revealed that conversation about Trump, it would be everywhere

Randall is a trumpertarian.

no, no, no! he’s a libertarian, i tell ya!

(allegedly)

If only he spent half as much time pimping the libertarian candidate as he does the trumpertarians I might take that seriously. Has he ever pimped a libertarian candidate?

A libertarian is a republican who smokes weed.

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 7:42 pm A libertarian is a republican who smokes weed.

lol

hmm I'd guess I'm closer to a libertarian than any other definable party.....but I'm no republican....and I dont smoke weed. Not that I care if ya smoke weed or not....


I keep meaning to try out these new gummies and billions of new things they got these days but....yknow....work life, kids.....wheres the time.

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 7:42 pm A libertarian is a republican who smokes weed.

Awesome!

OMG!