Page 217 of 229
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:53 am
by jfish26
(You’ve fallen right into the trap.)
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:02 am
by Deleted User 310
jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:53 am
(You’ve fallen right into the trap.)
I haven't fallen into any trap. I have already voted for Biden and would do so regardless.
I simply asked if they have been confirmed as real by someone in the emails... surely one of those always reliable "anonymous sources".
Even the Washington Post has an article out titled "insisting that the hunter biden laptop is fake is a trap, so is insisting that it is real".
Nobody knows much of anything at this point....but shockingly one side "knows" it is real, and the other side "knows" it is a fake russian disinformation campaign. It is so predictable, and the truth doesn't even really matter.
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:10 am
by Deleted User 310
The source saying the emails are real is apparently some guy named Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter, according to Rep Jim Jordan.
At least this unreliable(?) source isn't anonymous
BBC summary from a few days ago...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-54553132
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:16 am
by japhy
Teal.....is it blue or is it green?
discuss
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:20 am
by Deleted User 310
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:02 am
by ousdahl
I wonder how much of the Hunter investigation is some sorta...projection?
“I know you are but what am I?”
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:08 am
by Deleted User 310
ousdahl wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:02 am
I wonder how much of the Hunter investigation is some sorta...projection?
“I know you are but what am I?”
I think 0% if the FBI investigation has to do with that.
I think 100% of the trump outrage has to do with that.
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:19 am
by Sparko
The FBI had been warning that Guiliani was the focus of disinformation ops by the FSB. Borat makes him seem more than gullible. Classic rat-f$&king, from the party who pre-scandalizes every likely opponent. And Trump was rightly impeached for trying to build this scandal already. They just didn’t have any other ideas.
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:36 am
by twocoach
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:10 am
The source saying the emails are real is apparently some guy named Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter, according to Rep Jim Jordan.
At least this unreliable(?) source isn't anonymous
BBC summary from a few days ago...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-54553132
Even FoxNews has discredited his account of things.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter ... -questions
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:46 am
by Deleted User 310
Did you read the entire article or just the headline?
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:51 am
by twocoach
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:46 am
Did you read the entire article or just the headline?
The entire thing.
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:58 am
by jfish26
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:02 am
jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:53 am
(You’ve fallen right into the trap.)
I haven't fallen into any trap. I have already voted for Biden and would do so regardless.
I simply asked if they have been confirmed as real by someone in the emails... surely one of those always reliable "anonymous sources".
Even the Washington Post has an article out titled "insisting that the hunter biden laptop is fake is a trap, so is insisting that it is real".
Nobody knows much of anything at this point....but shockingly one side "knows" it is real, and the other side "knows" it is a fake russian disinformation campaign. It is so predictable, and the truth doesn't even really matter.
But the whole
point of this foreign meddling is to get people to talk about Biden corruption. That's the game.
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:59 am
by Deleted User 310
twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:51 am
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:46 am
Did you read the entire article or just the headline?
The entire thing.
I call BS, or your reading comprehension isn't great.
It doesn't discredit his "account of things" or discredit the emails being real. It simply said the stuff he turned over doesn't show proof of the things about Joe Biden being involved in the business dealings.
That isn't the same.
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:01 pm
by Deleted User 310
jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:58 am
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:02 am
jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:53 am
(You’ve fallen right into the trap.)
I haven't fallen into any trap. I have already voted for Biden and would do so regardless.
I simply asked if they have been confirmed as real by someone in the emails... surely one of those always reliable "anonymous sources".
Even the Washington Post has an article out titled "insisting that the hunter biden laptop is fake is a trap, so is insisting that it is real".
Nobody knows much of anything at this point....but shockingly one side "knows" it is real, and the other side "knows" it is a fake russian disinformation campaign. It is so predictable, and the truth doesn't even really matter.
But the whole
point of this foreign meddling is to get people to talk about Biden corruption. That's the game.
Even CNN says there is no evidence to support that this was a russian disinformation campaign.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/21/politics ... index.html
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:11 pm
by jfish26
That's not CNN saying anything. That's...the FBI not entering the political fray (which the DNI should not have done in the first place).
Again: this is exactly the point.
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:15 pm
by Deleted User 310
If what the DNI said was untrue the FBI would have said so rather than saying they have nothing further to add.
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:25 pm
by twocoach
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:01 pm
jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:58 am
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:02 am
I haven't fallen into any trap. I have already voted for Biden and would do so regardless.
I simply asked if they have been confirmed as real by someone in the emails... surely one of those always reliable "anonymous sources".
Even the Washington Post has an article out titled "insisting that the hunter biden laptop is fake is a trap, so is insisting that it is real".
Nobody knows much of anything at this point....but shockingly one side "knows" it is real, and the other side "knows" it is a fake russian disinformation campaign. It is so predictable, and the truth doesn't even really matter.
But the whole
point of this foreign meddling is to get people to talk about Biden corruption. That's the game.
Even CNN says there is no evidence to support that this was a russian disinformation campaign.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/21/politics ... index.html
Eh, that's not what that says at all. "Nothing to add" isnt an agreement.
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:26 pm
by twocoach
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:15 pm
If what the DNI said was untrue the FBI would have said so rather than saying they have nothing further to add.
Thats not true at all. If their investigation is still ongoing then I would expect them not to add anything since their standard policy is to not comment on ongoing investigations.
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:32 pm
by Sparko
It's a miracle! The dirt Trump was impeached trying to dig up turns out to be here in time for the election.
Or: This is kind of what happened last time with emails. Let's try it again. It's not like Trump's former campaign manager went to jail or had anything to do with sleazy elements in Ukraine.
Re: who ya got?
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:55 pm
by Mjl
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:15 pm
If what the DNI said was untrue the FBI would have said so rather than saying they have nothing further to add.
Again, do you know who John Ratcliffe is?
This is the fundamental problem with Trump. "Draining the swamp" meant replacing public servants with politicians and yes-men. You can't put a very partisan politician in a role and then complain when people don't believe that person's words.
