Kansas Crimson

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:26 pm

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:15 pm If what the DNI said was untrue the FBI would have said so rather than saying they have nothing further to add.

their standard policy is to not comment on ongoing investigations.

Oh really?

Trump has lost ground with every one of the groups he won with in 2016, even white males. He believes in winning thru theft.

DHop!

https://www.tmz.com/2020/10/26/deandre- ... f0dQ7g4J6k

Good stuff, but I don't think Fox is panicking. It's got to be easier to criticize a democratic president than defend the current one.

Wish that was a problem i would ever need to worry about.

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:13 am Good stuff, but I don't think Fox is panicking. It's got to be easier to criticize a democratic president than defend the current one.

Kind of my thinking. It probably makes for better TV anyway.

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 8:36 am

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:13 am Good stuff, but I don't think Fox is panicking. It's got to be easier to criticize a democratic president than defend the current one.

Kind of my thinking. It probably makes for better TV anyway.

I disagree - it's broadly speculated that Trump's post-office play will be to start a network (or join OANN). That would be a massive blow to Fox.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:03 am

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 8:36 am

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:13 am Good stuff, but I don't think Fox is panicking. It's got to be easier to criticize a democratic president than defend the current one.

Kind of my thinking. It probably makes for better TV anyway.

I disagree - it's broadly speculated that Trump's post-office play will be to start a network (or join OANN). That would be a massive blow to Fox.

All true, it will split the audience up a bit, but the crowd that wants grievance 24/7 will find time to watch their old favorites like Tucker. It will come down to a battle of malignant personalities at that point. trump will find time to guest on Fox while having his own shows on OAN.

What is oann? The oprah winfrey network?

Poor, poor, Martha.....you spend all that time kissing his ass and Nigel Farage gets more clown time than she does at the trump circus.

"Just come up fast. Fast. Fast. Come on. Quick. You got one minute! One minute, Martha! They don’t want to hear this, Martha. Come on. Let’s go. Quick, quick, quick. Come on"

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:10 am What is oann? The oprah winfrey network?

And he AWAKES!

It's like you rubbed the aggreivement lamp and out popped the genie.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:03 am

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 8:36 am

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:13 am Good stuff, but I don't think Fox is panicking. It's got to be easier to criticize a democratic president than defend the current one.

Kind of my thinking. It probably makes for better TV anyway.

I disagree - it's broadly speculated that Trump's post-office play will be to start a network (or join OANN). That would be a massive blow to Fox.

I thought trumps post office play was going to be to avoid prison?

I opined that Trump’s whole 2016 campaign was just some big publicity stunt with no real end game, or rather, that if there was some end game it was more likely to be a segue into some political talk media gig, more so than any end game of actually being potus.

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:10 am What is oann? The oprah winfrey network?

Yes, cuz one abbreviates “Winfrey” with an A

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 8:35 am

Wish that was a problem i would ever need to worry about.

Me too, bro!

And yet, somehow, there are millions of working class types scraping by who are ready to argue that raising taxes on that extra 10 grand is a bad thing.

Then again, these are also the types of folks who are likely to argue things like, higher wages for working class folks such as themselves is a bad thing.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:43 am I opined that Trump’s whole 2016 campaign was just some big publicity stunt with no real end game, or rather, that if there was some end game it was more likely to be a segue into some political talk media gig, more so than any end game of actually being potus.

I’ve always thought the same. It was a PR stunt for him, I don’t think he even wanted to win.