Listening to faded former beauty queen and Home Economics degree holder, Sen. Marsha "Karen" Blackburn lecture the accomplished Judge Jackson on "so called white priviledge" has to be the highlight so far.
I sent my Senator, the tiny fisted Josh Hawley an email last night entitled "you sanctimonious twat" and got my usual response about "what an honor it is to represent Japhy in Washington" and how
"Josh is fighting the good fight for Missouri" and "he appreciates my feedback". Mostly I write him for cathartic reasons and I hope someone on his staff gets a laugh when they read my description of their pencil necked shit weasel of a boss.
SCOTUS
Re: SCOTUS
Nero is an angler in the lake of darkness
-
Overlander
- Contributor
- Posts: 6140
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Re: SCOTUS
Before I speak up, I first want to know what DJT thinks of her.
Is she a wacko?
An idiot?
A radical?
Sad and pathetic?
Over rated?
A failure?
Stupid?
Ugly?
I kinda need some guidance from the countries ONLY geeenyus
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
Psych- Every Single Time
Re: SCOTUS
You know exactly what word he would use to describe her.Overlander wrote: ↑Tue Mar 22, 2022 8:53 pmBefore I speak up, I first want to know what DJT thinks of her.
Is she a wacko?
An idiot?
A radical?
Sad and pathetic?
Over rated?
A failure?
Stupid?
Ugly?
I kinda need some guidance from the countries ONLY geeenyus
Re: SCOTUS
It took Josh, Lindsey and Cancun Ted to point out that the real racist is the black woman sitting by herself in the middle of the room.
Defense. Rebounds.
-
KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13892
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: SCOTUS
i read there was a line of questioning from cruz about racist babies
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: SCOTUS
KUTradition wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 7:50 am i read there was a line of questioning from cruz about racist babies
well..yea. I mean, ask Qusdahl. What do you think Putin was doing bombing the maternity ward and children's hospital?
Just Ledoux it
-
KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13892
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: SCOTUS
CONFIRMED!!
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
-
Overlander
- Contributor
- Posts: 6140
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Re: SCOTUS
Amazing day in this countries’ history
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
Psych- Every Single Time
-
KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13892
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: SCOTUS
yes indeed
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
-
Deleted User 863
Re: SCOTUS
Well look at us 3 agreeing for once.
Glad I didn't say it first or it'd never have happened.
Glad I didn't say it first or it'd never have happened.
-
Deleted User 863
Re: SCOTUS
What's disappointing is the 47 people who didn't vote to confirm even though she is more than qualified.
We've really fucked this process up the last decade +.
We've really fucked this process up the last decade +.
-
Overlander
- Contributor
- Posts: 6140
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Re: SCOTUS
Get over yourselfBasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:01 pm Well look at us 3 agreeing for once.
Glad I didn't say it first or it'd never have happened.
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
Psych- Every Single Time
-
Deleted User 863
Re: SCOTUS
Rich coming from Mr. "look into my eyes".Overlander wrote: ↑Thu Apr 07, 2022 11:40 pmGet over yourselfBasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:01 pm Well look at us 3 agreeing for once.
Glad I didn't say it first or it'd never have happened.
Re: SCOTUS
“We” have fucked up the process only to the extent that “we” haven’t held those who actually fucked up the process accountable. The process was fucked up by one Mitch McConnell ably enabled by one Lindsey Graham and at least 48 other sycophants.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:02 pm What's disappointing is the 47 people who didn't vote to confirm even though she is more than qualified.
We've really fucked this process up the last decade +.
To be clear, “I” have no part in “we”
-
RainbowsandUnicorns
- Contributor
- Posts: 12491
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: SCOTUS
Amazing that looking back to 1789 my guess is no one thought a Black Woman would ever "sit on" the Supreme Court.
Amazing that looking back to 1789 we STILL have many (one is too many) people in this country who are hateful based solely on the race of the person who was just confirmed to "sit on" the Supreme Court.
Somewhat reminds me of being in Grant Park on November 4th 2008 and observing Black Grandparents with their Grandkids - crying - and my feeling somewhat detached (and actually somewhat ashamed) because I wasn't experiencing the joy (and possibly/probably some pain too) they were feeling - only because the difference of our skin color/s.
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
Re: SCOTUS
+1zsn wrote: ↑Sat Apr 09, 2022 2:35 am“We” have fucked up the process only to the extent that “we” haven’t held those who actually fucked up the process accountable. The process was fucked up by one Mitch McConnell ably enabled by one Lindsey Graham and at least 48 other sycophants.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:02 pm What's disappointing is the 47 people who didn't vote to confirm even though she is more than qualified.
We've really fucked this process up the last decade +.
To be clear, “I” have no part in “we”
-
RainbowsandUnicorns
- Contributor
- Posts: 12491
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: SCOTUS
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
-
Overlander
- Contributor
- Posts: 6140
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Re: SCOTUS
About fucking time
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
Psych- Every Single Time
Re: SCOTUS
Racist?
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan