Page 23 of 79
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 12:32 pm
by Deleted User 289
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 11:53 am
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 11:42 am
I don't believe anything that comes out of China about this.
Ousie does.
And admires it.
But still won't move there.
The Chinese government is full of shit. Ok. And? I say numbers shmumbers.
Do people reading this feel the majority of the citizens in this country are smarter and more respectful of one another when it comes to dealing with taking care of ourselves during a pandemic than the majority of the people in China are?
I don't. I know, shame on me!
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 1:09 pm
by ousdahl
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 11:53 am
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 11:42 am
I don't believe anything that comes out of China about this.
Ousie does.
And admires it.
But still won't move there.
what are your thoughts on the testing numbers in the US?
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 1:28 pm
by DCHawk1
ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 1:09 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 11:53 am
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 11:42 am
I don't believe anything that comes out of China about this.
Ousie does.
And admires it.
But still won't move there.
what are your thoughts on the testing numbers in the US?
That we can't force 11 million to get tested whether they like it or not?
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 1:54 pm
by Geezer
It's called controlling a pandemic.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 2:02 pm
by ousdahl
DC, do you mean to suggest that even if we did have more available tests, Mericans would refuse to be tested?
Do you think the level of testing is adequate?
What role do you see played by testing as part of the reopening?
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 2:18 pm
by jfish26
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 1:28 pm
ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 1:09 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 11:53 am
Ousie does.
And admires it.
But still won't move there.
what are your thoughts on the testing numbers in the US?
That we can't force 11 million to get tested whether they like it or not?
I really do respect that you are very consistent, and principled, on how you approach personal liberties issues. I struggle a lot with how that works on the ground, though, where the bad decisions of a distinct minority can have such catastrophic consequences for everyone else.
I'm not sure there is, or even that there should be, a "right" answer. It does seem logical to me, though, for the choice to forgo testing or to behave badly to come with some cost.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 2:23 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
A "public necessity" argument. Would likely have to show substantial need. Government may have an argument here.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 2:25 pm
by jfish26
CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 2:23 pm
A "public necessity" argument. Would likely have to show substantial need. Government may have an argument here.
And then we're in the religious exemption space.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 2:35 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
Yes, perhaps. How about vaccinate them first, then let them file the 1983 claim.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 2:53 pm
by Deleted User 89
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 1:28 pm
ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 1:09 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 11:53 am
Ousie does.
And admires it.
But still won't move there.
what are your thoughts on the testing numbers in the US?
That we can't force 11 million to get tested whether they like it or not?
if we actually had 11 million tests, that might be something to talk about
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 2:54 pm
by Deleted User 89
where’s jenny mccarthy when you need her
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 2:58 pm
by PhDhawk
I'd like to see how they do that, logistically, in 10 days.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 3:02 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 2:58 pm
I'd like to see how they do that, logistically, in 10 days.
Tests go to the people instead of vice versa.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 3:52 pm
by PhDhawk
CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 3:02 pm
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 2:58 pm
I'd like to see how they do that, logistically, in 10 days.
Tests go to the people instead of vice versa.
Every aspect of it though. How many testing machines with what throughput. Who's doing the testing? When/how were they trained? What are the quality controls? This is done by mail, or people go out and administer the test?
I mean, NO other country has come close to something like this, and that's ignoring the timeframe.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 4:24 pm
by MICHHAWK
If china says it, it must be true.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 5:32 pm
by Geezer
They built 7 hospitals in Wuhan in a week.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 6:13 pm
by DCHawk1
Geezer wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 5:32 pm
They built 7 hospitals in Wuhan in a week.
Your heroes.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 6:16 pm
by DCHawk1
Geezer wrote: ↑Tue May 12, 2020 1:54 pm
It's called controlling a pandemic.
Your heroes
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 6:16 pm
by ousdahl
Can’t we expect better of Merica?
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 6:17 pm
by Geezer
Everybody's favorite asshole is online tonight.