Page 23 of 41
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:24 pm
by PhDhawk
An opinion article written by a cultural anthropologist in a popular magazine.
Yep. I'm convinced. Science us bullshit.
If there's something dumb written in a popular mechanics magazine, that discredits everything Einstein ever did too right?
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:33 pm
by PhDhawk
I had a paint by numbers poster with a typo. That's when I stopped trusting mathematics.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:40 pm
by DCHawk1
You're kicking those imaginary dragons' asses.
I'll give you that.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:42 pm
by pdub
I still kick imaginary dragons asses.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:43 pm
by pdub
Imagine Dragons though, suck.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:43 pm
by DCHawk1
Not as well as PhD does -- kicking dragons' asses, that is.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:47 pm
by PhDhawk
A fucking freshman in an intro course would know better than to cite an opinion article in scientific American....it's not a scholarly journal, it's not peer reviewed. It's not even science...it's a magazine...like people or esquire. It was an opinion piece by a soft scientist who is trying to sell a bullshit book.
You're trying way too hard if this is the barrel you're scraping around in.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:51 pm
by PhDhawk
Who posted a magazine article about anthropology to try to circuitously discredit vaccines?
The dots you're trying to connect aren't there.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:56 pm
by DCHawk1
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:51 pm
Who posted a magazine article about anthropology to try to circuitously discredit vaccines?
That's an excellent question.
I have no idea who did that.
Do you have a link?
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:57 pm
by PhDhawk
Lulz
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:58 pm
by DCHawk1
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:47 pm
A fucking freshman in an intro course would know better than to cite an opinion article in scientific American....it's not a scholarly journal, it's not peer reviewed. It's not even science...it's a magazine...like people or esquire. It was an opinion piece by a soft scientist who is trying to sell a bullshit book.
You're trying way too hard if this is the barrel you're scraping around in.
A fucking freshman might also know that your anger and defensiveness are off-the-charts weird.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:58 pm
by DCHawk1
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:57 pmLulz
I know, right?
Srsly, though.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 6:00 pm
by PhDhawk
What's weird is your attack on all of science.
You shoulda just DMd lobster and randy directly.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 6:00 pm
by DCHawk1
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:47 pm
You're trying way too hard if this is the barrel you're scraping around in.
Trying too hard to do what?
What am I doing?
What are you doing?
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 6:01 pm
by DCHawk1
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 6:00 pm
What's weird is your attack on all of science.
You shoulda just DMd lobster and randy directly.
Again, what are you talking about? When did I attack "all of science?"
Settle down.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 6:02 pm
by PhDhawk
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 7:02 pm
i DoN't UnDeRsTaNd WhY dUmBaSsEs WoN't JuSt TrUsT sCiEnCe!
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 6:03 pm
by DCHawk1
Yes. And?
Is there an attack on science in that...or is it something you attributed to me based on something else?
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 6:04 pm
by PhDhawk
Giggle
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 6:17 pm
by DCHawk1
Gotcha.
Re: Conspiracies
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 10:08 pm
by japhy
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:24 pm
An opinion article written by a cultural anthropologist in a popular magazine.
Yep. I'm convinced. Science us bullshit.
If there's something dumb written in a popular mechanics magazine, that discredits everything Einstein ever did too right?
I have to question your science bonafides. You are dismissive of the importance of this subject with "real scientists". A quick check shows this study to be a front page concern within the learned scientific community. Maybe it is you who isn't in tune with current discussions in real science.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/tony-dun ... ridiculous