Page 23 of 28

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:31 am
by JKLivin
MICHHAWK wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:28 am i don't want ch as my next president anymore than i don't want dt.

i don't want dt as my next president anymore than i don't want ch.
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice. - G.L. Weinrib

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:35 am
by twocoach
JKLivin wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:20 am
pdub wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 10:31 am Debate watchers said, 63% to 37%, that Harris turned in a better performance onstage in Philadelphia.
And yet they are more confident in Trump’s ability to fix problems. You’d almost think people figured out that 3 on 1 is a pretty big disadvantage, that Giggles got the questions ahead of time and had people in her earpiece telling her what to say.

https://nypost.com/2024/09/12/us-news/c ... ooth-ones/
Nice. You managed to fit three bold faced lies into one sentence.

Gee who could have predicted that the candidates would get questions about the economy, race, foreign policy, the war in Ukraine and the Israel/Gaza conflict?

And links to the Tiffany earrings that Harris was wearing have already been distributed to dispel that idiotic Bluetooth earring nonsense. They are the Tiffany & co. South Sea pearl earrings in 18k gold from the Tiffany Hardwear collection if you would like to look them up yourself.

So you don't think that your childish lies are harmless and victimless, here's the most unsurprising fallout of this ignorant story about "illegal Haitian immigrants eating pets". They are now reporting threats and concerns for their safety thanks to unhinged MAGA loons.

https://haitiantimes.com/2024/09/11/hai ... t-attacks/

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:36 am
by jfish26
MICHHAWK wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:28 am i don't want ch as my next president anymore than i don't want dt.

i don't want dt as my next president anymore than i don't want ch.
Ok.

Your choices are Trump (unaccountable to the law) or Harris (accountable to the law).

Even without regard for their relative tendencies toward criminality, this is not a hard choice.

And as I said yesterday, in my opinion there is NO conceivable policy justification for an American to choose a king above the law over a President who is subject to it.

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:41 am
by MICHHAWK
this is no less campaign propaganda than dog eating haitians.

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:42 am
by twocoach
MICHHAWK wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:41 am this is no less campaign propaganda than dog eating haitians.
"This" what?

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:45 am
by jfish26
MICHHAWK wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:41 am this is no less campaign propaganda than dog eating haitians.
My post?

No, it's not - it's the law of the land.

I understand that does not seem right. Because it is not right, and it is not American.

But that is how the law works now, thanks to Trump and his puppeteers/patrons.

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:45 am
by MICHHAWK
the swifties may gobble that $#!t up. i'm an adult. i know better.

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:47 am
by jhawks99
One guy says he will be a dictator and suspend the constitution (but only for a day, right)

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:48 am
by jfish26
MICHHAWK wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:45 am the swifties may gobble that $#!t up. i'm an adult. i know better.
You very clearly do not.

This is now the law: a President is 100% immune from criminal prosecution for exercising his "core powers," and presumptively immune from criminal prosecution for anything else he does in his capacity as President.

And the Supreme Court calls the balls and strikes.

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:54 am
by japhy
jfish26 wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:48 am
MICHHAWK wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:45 am the swifties may gobble that $#!t up. i'm an adult. i know better.
You very clearly do not.

This is now the law: a President is 100% immune from criminal prosecution for exercising his "core powers," and presumptively immune from criminal prosecution for anything else he does in his capacity as President.

And the Supreme Court calls the balls and strikes.
Wut could go wrong, as long as "our" president is in office? Doing "our" bidding.

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:55 am
by JKLivin
twocoach wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:35 am
JKLivin wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:20 am
pdub wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 10:31 am Debate watchers said, 63% to 37%, that Harris turned in a better performance onstage in Philadelphia.
And yet they are more confident in Trump’s ability to fix problems. You’d almost think people figured out that 3 on 1 is a pretty big disadvantage, that Giggles got the questions ahead of time and had people in her earpiece telling her what to say.

https://nypost.com/2024/09/12/us-news/c ... ooth-ones/
Nice. You managed to fit three bold faced lies into one sentence.

Gee who could have predicted that the candidates would get questions about the economy, race, foreign policy, the war in Ukraine and the Israel/Gaza conflict?

And links to the Tiffany earrings that Harris was wearing have already been distributed to dispel that idiotic Bluetooth earring nonsense. They are the Tiffany & co. South Sea pearl earrings in 18k gold from the Tiffany Hardwear collection if you would like to look them up yourself.

So you don't think that your childish lies are harmless and victimless, here's the most unsurprising fallout of this ignorant story about "illegal Haitian immigrants eating pets". They are now reporting threats and concerns for their safety thanks to unhinged MAGA loons.

https://haitiantimes.com/2024/09/11/hai ... t-attacks/
Bull. Shit.

And, when you flood a community with illegals, you can expect backlash.

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:56 am
by MICHHAWK
does that apply to "all" presidents. or just the ones you don't favor.

do we need to be concerned that the sanfranciscoradical could run afoul in the event.

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 12:03 pm
by japhy
MICHHAWK wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:56 am does that apply to "all" presidents. or just the ones you don't favor.

do we need to be concerned that the sanfranciscoradical could run afoul in the event.
Have you considered taking a cognitive test? Maybe a community college class on reading comprehension?

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 12:05 pm
by jfish26
MICHHAWK wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:56 am does that apply to "all" presidents. or just the ones you don't favor.
You would have to ask the Supreme Court, which made itself the sole authority on the extent of Presidential immunity.

That is the point.

It has nothing whatsoever to do with my views of which candidate has better polices, or even which candidate is more likely to abuse the powers of the office.

It is about a Supreme Court that has broken perhaps the most essential foundational principle of our country.

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 12:21 pm
by jfish26
If this makes you uncomfortable: good. We should all be uncomfortable, and shocked and sad and angry and scared, that the Supreme Court has undone our constitutional separation of powers.

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 12:23 pm
by twocoach
JKLivin wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:55 am
twocoach wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:35 am
JKLivin wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:20 am

And yet they are more confident in Trump’s ability to fix problems. You’d almost think people figured out that 3 on 1 is a pretty big disadvantage, that Giggles got the questions ahead of time and had people in her earpiece telling her what to say.

https://nypost.com/2024/09/12/us-news/c ... ooth-ones/
Nice. You managed to fit three bold faced lies into one sentence.

Gee who could have predicted that the candidates would get questions about the economy, race, foreign policy, the war in Ukraine and the Israel/Gaza conflict?

And links to the Tiffany earrings that Harris was wearing have already been distributed to dispel that idiotic Bluetooth earring nonsense. They are the Tiffany & co. South Sea pearl earrings in 18k gold from the Tiffany Hardwear collection if you would like to look them up yourself.

So you don't think that your childish lies are harmless and victimless, here's the most unsurprising fallout of this ignorant story about "illegal Haitian immigrants eating pets". They are now reporting threats and concerns for their safety thanks to unhinged MAGA loons.

https://haitiantimes.com/2024/09/11/hai ... t-attacks/
Bull. Shit.

And, when you flood a community with illegals, you can expect backlash.
AGAIN, these Haitian immigrants are LEGAL immigrants. You continue to LIE.

And your "I don't believe you but if I did believe you then they deserved it" is peak Donald Trump "I've never heard of Project 2025 but it has some good stuff and some bad stuff".

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 1:07 pm
by Sparko
Psych: the Monroe Doctrine has its pluses. But also responsibilitues.
Mich: you can eat crunchwraps with Kamala or be the crunchwrap with Trump.

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 1:15 pm
by MICHHAWK
we know exactly what a ch presidency will look and feel like. we have been living it for the last 3.5 years.

what more do we need to know.

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 1:19 pm
by jfish26
MICHHAWK wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 1:15 pm we know exactly what a ch presidency will look and feel like. we have been living it for the 3.5 years.

what more do we need to know.
You need to know that President Trump would be above the law, and President Harris would not be.

Choose wisely.

Re: OFFICIAL DEBATE DRINKING THREAD

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2024 1:27 pm
by pdub
JKLivin wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 11:20 am
pdub wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 10:31 am Debate watchers said, 63% to 37%, that Harris turned in a better performance onstage in Philadelphia.
And yet they are more confident in Trump’s ability to fix problems. You’d almost think people figured out that 3 on 1 is a pretty big disadvantage, that Giggles got the questions ahead of time and had people in her earpiece telling her what to say.

https://nypost.com/2024/09/12/us-news/c ... ooth-ones/
https://www.factcheck.org/2024/09/viral ... he-debate/