Kansas Crimson

One of lobsters buddies.

Brazilian anti-vax politician has died from Covid-19

https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2021/03/ ... -covid-19/

I'm not anti-vax. I'm anti-covid vax (experimental vax with long term safety concerns...)

Walrus wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 10:52 pm I'm not anti-vax. I'm anti-covid vax (experimental vax with long term safety concerns...)

They all passed their clinical trials. With tens of millions vaccinated, I'd say they're not experimental any more.

And clearly very safe.

How would something that's no longer in your body cause safety concerns in the future?

2020 feelz!

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKBN2B917P

Is there a bigger group of snowflakes than white supremacists?

I think of Phd when I see this.

If anyone would like to hear a vaccine doctor speak of the differences between the past and the current covid jab, this is worth listening to. Says the covid vaccine could potentially damage your immune system in the long term. Cannot say this is a fact, as only time will tell.

except he’s not a “vaccine doctor”...whatever that is (he’s a dementia specialist, btw)

Walrus wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 1:58 pm I think of Phd when I see this.

Similar to what the rest of us think of when they think of you.


If the masks were cocks.

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 5:54 pm except he’s not a “vaccine doctor”...whatever that is (he’s a dementia specialist, btw)

But....youtube

Jeepins back

Walrus wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 2:06 pm If anyone would like to hear a vaccine doctor speak of the differences between the past and the current covid jab, this is worth listening to. Says the covid vaccine could potentially damage your immune system in the long term. Cannot say this is a fact, as only time will tell.

So who am I supposed to believe?

https://www.deplatformdisease.com/blog/ ... hes-claims

I think you're old enough to decide for yourself. Or maybe you should just let the news decide for you.

Walrus wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:46 pm I think you're old enough to decide for yourself. Or maybe you should just let the news decide for you.

Or I could base what I should and shouldn't believe to be true based on the amount of Youtube views. Right?
You know, sort of like believing Tulsi and Andrew had legitimate shots at winning the Democratic nomination based solely on their Youtube popularity.

The establishment did not want them, and they are far more powerful than Youtube.

Bill Maher, warning of the same thing I've warned about for months.

This vaccine appears to have maybe caused blood clots. At least one person died from the blood clots, and others were seriously hurt. However, we cannot conclude that the clots were caused from the vaccine. We should assume it's impossible to die from a vaccine, or perhaps, they died from covid.

Norwegian experts say AstraZeneca vaccine is behind the deadly blood clots

https://insiderpaper.com/norwegian-expe ... ood-clots/

Insider Paper is your source for real news from around the world. The site covers Breaking News, Tech News, Games, Top 10 Trends, and World News. The main focus of the website is to bring you first-hand, unique and inside information from our valid sources.

Rand trying to talk some sense into Fauci reminds me a lot of myself trying to talk to Phd.

‘You Parade Around In Two Masks For Show’: Sen. Rand Paul Questions Dr. Fauci On Wearing Masks After Vaccination

https://dailycaller.com/2021/03/18/sen- ... ccination/