Page 25 of 60

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 4:46 pm
by zsn
Cascadia wrote: Thu Jun 23, 2022 11:46 am It’s all a fallout of “owning the libs”. The GOP has no moral compass and no real policy they believe in.
Exactly. It’s been their only policy for the past 3 decades, besides “Let’s start wars and let the Dems deal with the consequences” and “Let’s give tax cuts to the extremely wealthy and let the Dems deal with the consequences”

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:13 pm
by zsn
According to the current gun law ruling, only things that existed at the time of the 2nd Amendment ratification is applicable. So did they just rule that one doesn’t have a right to own an AR-15, computer or an automobile?

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:23 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns
It's been a really shitty past few years in our country for a lot of reasons.
Add this to the growing list of what will go down in history as one of or many failures.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:22 am
by ousdahl

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:28 am
by Cascadia
So, yeah, today is probably worse.

How long until we’re one of the shithole countries?

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:35 am
by KUTradition
surprise, surprise…confidence in the SCOTUS is at an historic low

its ratings are worse than Biden’s :lol:

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:51 am
by Cascadia
Also, is Clarence Thomas the worst American?

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:52 am
by KUTradition
his wife is probably worse, but she doesn’t have the power

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:54 am
by ousdahl
RIP Roe V. Wade.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:57 am
by twocoach
Cascadia wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:28 am So, yeah, today is probably worse.

How long until we’re one of the shithole countries?
Roe vs. Wade has always been on shaky ground from a legal perspective. I fully believe that no state should have any rule in place forcing a woman to carry a pregnancy to term but the notion that there is some sort of Constitutional right to such a situation is kinda weak. There really is nothing in the Constitution that explicitly provides such a right. Alito is not wrong in that aspect.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:29 am
by MICHHAWK
don't fret. you will be able to go to california and get your abortion right up to your due date.

this is a tourism opportunity for your ca's and ny's and or's and such.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:32 am
by KUTradition
MICHHAWK wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:29 am don't fret. you will be able to go to california and get your abortion right up to your due date.

this is a tourism opportunity for your ca's and ny's and or's and such.
glad you can still get yours in michigan…lucky

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:35 am
by zsn
“Abortion is not “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition,” according to Alito, and, therefore, not protected as a right.”

But slavery, bigotry, oppression of women, shooting innocent natives and systematic genocide was what built this country. Welcome to The Greatest Country Ever!!

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:37 am
by jhawks99
Looks like contraception and same sex marriage are up next.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:41 am
by zsn
So much for “mah rights”. Codified in Law: when and what kind of medical care women can get and who you can do what with. The Soviet Politburo and Imams send their congratulations.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:49 am
by KUTradition
fortunately numbnutz kept everyone in check, and that this decision was only leaked as a draft opinion

so glad it didn’t come to fruition

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:08 am
by KUTradition
somebody should tell him he’s being hysterical

Justice Thomas: SCOTUS ‘should reconsider’ contraception, same-sex marriage rulings

https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2022/ ... s-00042256

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:09 am
by KUTradition

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:17 am
by jhawks99
KUTradition wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:08 am somebody should tell him he’s being hysterical

Justice Thomas: SCOTUS ‘should reconsider’ contraception, same-sex marriage rulings

https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2022/ ... s-00042256
You think 5 of these justices would vote to keep these rights?

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:27 am
by KUTradition
jhawks99 wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:17 am
KUTradition wrote: Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:08 am somebody should tell him he’s being hysterical

Justice Thomas: SCOTUS ‘should reconsider’ contraception, same-sex marriage rulings

https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2022/ ... s-00042256
You think 5 of these justices would vote to keep these rights?
Roberts is the only one i think might exercise some restraint…the other four, not so much