Page 25 of 60
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 4:46 pm
by zsn
Cascadia wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 11:46 am
It’s all a fallout of “owning the libs”. The GOP has no moral compass and no real policy they believe in.
Exactly. It’s been their only policy for the past 3 decades, besides “Let’s start wars and let the Dems deal with the consequences” and “Let’s give tax cuts to the extremely wealthy and let the Dems deal with the consequences”
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:13 pm
by zsn
According to the current gun law ruling, only things that existed at the time of the 2nd Amendment ratification is applicable. So did they just rule that one doesn’t have a right to own an AR-15, computer or an automobile?
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:23 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns
It's been a really shitty past few years in our country for a lot of reasons.
Add this to the growing list of what will go down in history as one of or many failures.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:22 am
by ousdahl
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:28 am
by Cascadia
So, yeah, today is probably worse.
How long until we’re one of the shithole countries?
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:35 am
by KUTradition
surprise, surprise…confidence in the SCOTUS is at an historic low
its ratings are worse than Biden’s
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:51 am
by Cascadia
Also, is Clarence Thomas the worst American?
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:52 am
by KUTradition
his wife is probably worse, but she doesn’t have the power
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:54 am
by ousdahl
RIP Roe V. Wade.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:57 am
by twocoach
Cascadia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:28 am
So, yeah, today is probably worse.
How long until we’re one of the shithole countries?
Roe vs. Wade has always been on shaky ground from a legal perspective. I fully believe that no state should have any rule in place forcing a woman to carry a pregnancy to term but the notion that there is some sort of Constitutional right to such a situation is kinda weak. There really is nothing in the Constitution that explicitly provides such a right. Alito is not wrong in that aspect.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:29 am
by MICHHAWK
don't fret. you will be able to go to california and get your abortion right up to your due date.
this is a tourism opportunity for your ca's and ny's and or's and such.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:32 am
by KUTradition
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:29 am
don't fret. you will be able to go to california and get your abortion right up to your due date.
this is a tourism opportunity for your ca's and ny's and or's and such.
glad you can still get yours in michigan…lucky
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:35 am
by zsn
“Abortion is not “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition,” according to Alito, and, therefore, not protected as a right.”
But slavery, bigotry, oppression of women, shooting innocent natives and systematic genocide was what built this country. Welcome to The Greatest Country Ever!!
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:37 am
by jhawks99
Looks like contraception and same sex marriage are up next.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:41 am
by zsn
So much for “mah rights”. Codified in Law: when and what kind of medical care women can get and who you can do what with. The Soviet Politburo and Imams send their congratulations.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:49 am
by KUTradition
fortunately numbnutz kept everyone in check, and that this decision was only leaked as a draft opinion
so glad it didn’t come to fruition
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:08 am
by KUTradition
somebody should tell him he’s being hysterical
Justice Thomas: SCOTUS ‘should reconsider’ contraception, same-sex marriage rulings
https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2022/ ... s-00042256
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:09 am
by KUTradition
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:17 am
by jhawks99
You think 5 of these justices would vote to keep these rights?
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:27 am
by KUTradition
jhawks99 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:17 am
You think 5 of these justices would vote to keep these rights?
Roberts is the only one i think might exercise some restraint…the other four, not so much