Page 25 of 64
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:47 pm
by TDub
pdub wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:03 pm
ESPN.com please put the men’s scores first. It’s confusing.
it's because ESPN is carrying the women's tournament right? Maybe they're salty. ESPN has gotten consistently worse over the last decade
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:49 pm
by RainbowsandUnicorns
Can/will someone please send a wake up call to Catsup and MusTURD and let them know they have a game today?
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:50 pm
by KUTradition
c’mon cyclowns…jeebus
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:53 pm
by Deleted User 863
TDub wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:45 pm
my goodness has the reffing been inconsistent across this tourament...my lord. Never know whats legal anymore
All season. Every season.
I will give credit where credit is due, I've watched a shit ton of different games being home with covid, and the overall quality of refereeing has been MUCH better than the regular season so far. Despite inconsistencies game to game. Which I guess, isn't saying too much, since I thought the regular season was pretty bad.
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:57 pm
by KUTradition
KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:50 pm
c’mon cyclowns…jeebus
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:58 pm
by pdub
19-2?
ISU doesn’t have the offense to rally from that.
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:00 pm
by Back2Lawrence
pdub wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:03 pm
ESPN.com please put the men’s scores first. It’s confusing.
It’s so dumb. And predictable. So weird they put them first with broadcast rights and all that, ya know? Just another media outlet prioritizing their own agenda over what people actually want. I think ESPN being a media outlet might be most debatable think here.
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:01 pm
by KUTradition
Back2Lawrence wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:00 pm
pdub wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:03 pm
ESPN.com please put the men’s scores first. It’s confusing.
It’s so dumb. And predictable. So weird they put them first with broadcast rights and all that, ya know? Just another media outlet prioritizing their own agenda over what people actually want. I think ESPN being a media outlet might be most debatable think here.
i guarantee, as TDub suggested, that there’s some saltiness there
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:02 pm
by pdub
TDub wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:47 pm
pdub wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:03 pm
ESPN.com please put the men’s scores first. It’s confusing.
it's because ESPN is carrying the women's tournament right? Maybe they're salty. ESPN has gotten consistently worse over the last decade
Sure.
But know your audience…tv is much different than your site.
Follow the analytics. That’s just good user experience based on data—that’s what a large site such as espn should model itself after.
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:08 pm
by Sparko
ISU looking slow. But Pitt is getting some physical latitude
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:08 pm
by Back2Lawrence
Oh I hate that it’s first…..I just found a fix, though. Unfavorite women’s college basketball and it goes away. Or did for me
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:10 pm
by Deleted User 863
Back2Lawrence wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:08 pm
Oh I hate that it’s first…..I just found a fix, though. Unfavorite women’s college basketball and it goes away. Or did for me
Thank you!
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:10 pm
by KUTradition
pdub wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:58 pm
19-2?
ISU doesn’t have the offense to rally from that.
^^^^^^
players or scheme
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:11 pm
by Sparko
Coming alive finally. Pitt not looking like 1970 UCLA either
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:11 pm
by pdub
Our 5, St Mary’s, going through.
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:12 pm
by Sparko
KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:10 pm
pdub wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:58 pm
19-2?
ISU doesn’t have the offense to rally from that.
^^^^^^
players or scheme
I would agree except Pitt is a plodding SOB of a team waiting to panic
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:14 pm
by Sparko
pdub wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:11 pm
Our 5, St Mary’s, going through.
One advantage of the easier schedule is confidence. And fresh legs. ISU looks like that came through a brutal stretch without legs.
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:14 pm
by KUTradition
Sparko wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:12 pm
KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:10 pm
pdub wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 2:58 pm
19-2?
ISU doesn’t have the offense to rally from that.
^^^^^^
players or scheme
I would agree except Pitt is a plodding SOB of a team waiting to panic
i’m just commenting off of the score, unfortunately can’t watch
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:14 pm
by Sparko
KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:14 pm
Sparko wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:12 pm
KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:10 pm
^^^^^^
players or scheme
I would agree except Pitt is a plodding SOB of a team waiting to panic
i’m just commenting off of the score, unfortunately can’t watch
Got it. You are missing a lot of smacking around
Re: March Madness 23
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:23 pm
by randylahey