Page 262 of 268

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 3:05 pm
by twocoach
jfish26 wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:19 pm The lengths you people will go to dress up not believing in the Constitution or the rule of law.
They believe it when it benefits them to believe it. But it the application of the Constitution or of the law negatively affects what they want to do then it can apparently be ignored.

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 3:10 pm
by jfish26
twocoach wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 3:05 pm
jfish26 wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:19 pm The lengths you people will go to dress up not believing in the Constitution or the rule of law.
They believe it when it benefits them to believe it. But it the application of the Constitution or of the law negatively affects what they want to do then it can apparently be ignored.
Was it you who posted Wilhoit’s Law or whatever that was?

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 3:12 pm
by jhawks99
Damn, I like it.

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 3:18 pm
by twocoach
jfish26 wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 3:10 pm
twocoach wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 3:05 pm
jfish26 wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:19 pm The lengths you people will go to dress up not believing in the Constitution or the rule of law.
They believe it when it benefits them to believe it. But it the application of the Constitution or of the law negatively affects what they want to do then it can apparently be ignored.
Was it you who posted Wilhoit’s Law or whatever that was?
No, not me but it looks pretty spot on:

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 4:32 pm
by KUTradition
JKLivin wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:02 pm
KUTradition wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 12:57 pm he’s so embarrassed…you can see it in his face

sad
He answered the question exceedingly well. He cut to the heart of the issue. She was just pissed that he wouldn't give her the #wokegotcha response she was looking for. She was also super disrespectful. Doubly sad for her and for your side.
no he didn’t

:lol:

you’re as big of a lying piece of shit as he is

do better

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 4:44 pm
by KUTradition
A nine-minute, unedited, undercover interview with Roger Stone revealed some of the MAGA ally’s more disturbing goals for a second Trump administration.

The covert recording of a discussion between Stone and an undercover journalist at a meet and greet in Jacksonville, Florida, on August 4, published by documentarian Lauren Windsor, caught Stone admitting live on camera that he already intends to send “armed guards to dispute the election in Detroit” and to imprison “former Attorney General Bill Barr if Trump returns to power.”



During a Catholics for Catholics event at Mar-a-Lago in March, the liberal filmmaker got Stone to spill the beans on the right’s preemptive effort to undermine the 2024 election results.

“We’re working on this,” Stone said at the time, noting that “overconfidence” in voter turnout was one of the biggest issues for Republicans. He then said that Trump’s side would be armed with “lawyers, judges, [and] technology” to challenge the official results if necessary.

“At least this time when they do it, you have a lawyer and a judge—his home phone number standing by—so you can stop it,” Stone said. “We made no preparations last time, none.… There are technical, legal steps that we have to take to try and have a more honest election. We’re not there yet, but there’s things that can be done.”

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 5:02 pm
by jfish26
KUTradition wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 4:44 pm A nine-minute, unedited, undercover interview with Roger Stone revealed some of the MAGA ally’s more disturbing goals for a second Trump administration.

The covert recording of a discussion between Stone and an undercover journalist at a meet and greet in Jacksonville, Florida, on August 4, published by documentarian Lauren Windsor, caught Stone admitting live on camera that he already intends to send “armed guards to dispute the election in Detroit” and to imprison “former Attorney General Bill Barr if Trump returns to power.”



During a Catholics for Catholics event at Mar-a-Lago in March, the liberal filmmaker got Stone to spill the beans on the right’s preemptive effort to undermine the 2024 election results.

“We’re working on this,” Stone said at the time, noting that “overconfidence” in voter turnout was one of the biggest issues for Republicans. He then said that Trump’s side would be armed with “lawyers, judges, [and] technology” to challenge the official results if necessary.

“At least this time when they do it, you have a lawyer and a judge—his home phone number standing by—so you can stop it,” Stone said. “We made no preparations last time, none.… There are technical, legal steps that we have to take to try and have a more honest election. We’re not there yet, but there’s things that can be done.”
All of which is to say:

Image

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 5:51 pm
by JKLivin
KUTradition wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 4:32 pm
JKLivin wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:02 pm
KUTradition wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 12:57 pm he’s so embarrassed…you can see it in his face

sad
He answered the question exceedingly well. He cut to the heart of the issue. She was just pissed that he wouldn't give her the #wokegotcha response she was looking for. She was also super disrespectful. Doubly sad for her and for your side.
no he didn’t

:lol:

you’re as big of a lying piece of shit as he is

do better
I disagree. I listened to the entire clip and found his response to be incisive and pointed. The fact that it triggers your ilk further proves my point.

Get out of the way or get run over.

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 5:53 pm
by Sparko
The Inquisition!

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:00 pm
by Overlander
"Get out of the way or get run over."

So masculine. So manly. Even your cute catch phrases have hair on their chests.

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:04 pm
by KUTradition
JKLivin wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 5:51 pm
KUTradition wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 4:32 pm
JKLivin wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 1:02 pm

He answered the question exceedingly well. He cut to the heart of the issue. She was just pissed that he wouldn't give her the #wokegotcha response she was looking for. She was also super disrespectful. Doubly sad for her and for your side.
no he didn’t

:lol:

you’re as big of a lying piece of shit as he is

do better
I disagree.
not news, so you can stop there

or, keep droning on and on with the same tired, disproven conspiracy nonsense

someone of your purported IQ should be smarter…so, you’re either gullible, willfully ignorant, not so smart, or just a piece of shit

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:10 pm
by Overlander
KCrim Poll?

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 7:21 pm
by JKLivin
KUTradition wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:04 pm
JKLivin wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 5:51 pm
KUTradition wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 4:32 pm
no he didn’t

:lol:

you’re as big of a lying piece of shit as he is

do better
I disagree.
not news, so you can stop there

or, keep droning on and on with the same tired, disproven conspiracy nonsense

someone of your purported IQ should be smarter…so, you’re either gullible, willfully ignorant, not so smart, or just a piece of shit
Coming from the likes of you and PBB, I’m not inclined to put much stock in your assessment.

Get out of the way or get run over.

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 7:22 pm
by KUTradition
giggles

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 7:44 pm
by JKLivin
Overlander wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:00 pm "Get out of the way or get run over."

So masculine. So manly. Even your cute catch phrases have hair on their chests.
Well, we can all only aspire to be half as manly as you, PBB.

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 8:00 pm
by Overlander
JKLivin wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 7:44 pm
Overlander wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:00 pm "Get out of the way or get run over."

So masculine. So manly. Even your cute catch phrases have hair on their chests.
Well, we can all only aspire to be half as manly as you, PBB.
Nah, I am confident you would land in that 20–22% range.

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2024 8:03 pm
by JKLivin
Overlander wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 8:00 pm
JKLivin wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 7:44 pm
Overlander wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:00 pm "Get out of the way or get run over."

So masculine. So manly. Even your cute catch phrases have hair on their chests.
Well, we can all only aspire to be half as manly as you, PBB.
Nah, I am confident you would land in that 20–22% range.
Gosh, that just made life worth living somehow. Thanks, PBB.

Re: 2024

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2024 8:24 am
by KUTradition

Re: 2024

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2024 8:26 am
by jfish26
Meanwhile, our institutions are failing us.


Re: 2024

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2024 8:35 am
by KUTradition
jfish26 wrote: Sat Oct 12, 2024 8:26 am Meanwhile, our institutions are failing us.

linking for the ease of others

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/us/p ... ivist.html