yea.
But I think Trump II can be handled inevitably as a little more of a known commodity than, say, Trump I...assuming anyone (but Dems in particular) learned anything from Trump I.
yea.
He does have that heartland everyman's appeal of sorts, right?
Sure, AOC does, if she's running for the house or the senate in a blue state.BiggDick wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 2:32 pm I think AOC might have that something something that Dems can't otherwise seem to figure out.
That's to say, enough appeal to some "base," and/or in some populist kinda way, like Trump
but - and also like Trump - in nothing more than a cosplay-populist kinda way.
The candidate should be whomever possesses baseline credentials/bona fides that is best positioned to speak to (and be heard by) those voters who are most directly harmed economically by Trump II.BiggDick wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 3:17 pm yea, the whole woman (and partiucularly woman of color) thing may or may not be a double-edged sword.
but actually, I'm not big on AOC, so the whole "projecting" thing can't really apply here. It's a matter of sincerity...the cosplay thing kinda bugs me.
ETA I just think if there IS something to learn from Trump, it's that anti-establishment populist sentiments might be the move to win elections.