i’m with you
21-22 lineup
- NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: 21-22 lineup
Oh, I love the direction this team is going. Self definitely has guards that can score and distribute. Has some good stretch 4s coming in. Just don't think Bishop is needed, like at all.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: 21-22 lineup
By the first tip of the Champions Classic, I will have convinced myself that we should be the favorite to win it all.
Just like every other season.
Just like every other season.
-
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:08 am
Re: 21-22 lineup
Where are you getting this number? I'm seeing 12 less makes and 47 less points in 3 more games.
As far as ORtg, that speaks more to how bad Kansas' offense was last year and not how good he is offensively. Creighton had 4 guys in their rotation who would have the highest ORtg on Kansas last year.
- NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: 21-22 lineup
He has a really good per 40 rating. Cool. If he played close to that. But he doesn't, for some reason. And he's not a good fit for this roster at this time.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
-
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:08 am
Re: 21-22 lineup
This. I'm not seeing a bunch of negative comments about the team next year, just a few people not seeing the point of adding an undersized 5 with no offensive game outside of catching alley oops. If that's what you're looking for I'll ride with Adams and Curry.NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:45 pmOh, I love the direction this team is going. Self definitely has guards that can score and distribute. Has some good stretch 4s coming in. Just don't think Bishop is needed, like at all.
- punkrockhawk
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 8:33 am
Re: 21-22 lineup
I haven't seen anything saying that Bishop is coming to Kansas. Maybe I missed it somewhere though.
- NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: 21-22 lineup
Tons assuming it is a done deal.punkrockhawk wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:07 pm I haven't seen anything saying that Bishop is coming to Kansas. Maybe I missed it somewhere though.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
Re: 21-22 lineup
Plus, the best thing about it is that it's not this years team
Just Ledoux it
Re: 21-22 lineup
rightTDub wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:19 pmPlus, the best thing about it is that it's not this years team
and i think that’s really the thing, that the bar was lowered quite a bit by this year’s team
Re: 21-22 lineup
Not sure about the rest of you, but Newton is really making me want Bishop to be a Jayhawk that much more.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: 21-22 lineup
But that's what makes absolutely no sense.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:29 pmright
and i think that’s really the thing, that the bar was lowered quite a bit by this year’s team
As it stands, next year's team is just this year's team except we're trading Marcus Garrett for a Missouri Valley guard that is also not a true point guard.
The other moves were the 4 guys that got the least amount of minutes of any scholarship player.
Re: 21-22 lineup
Was just gonna post that.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:31 pmBut that's what makes absolutely no sense.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:29 pmright
and i think that’s really the thing, that the bar was lowered quite a bit by this year’s team
As it stands, next year's team is just this year's team except we're trading Marcus Garrett for a Missouri Valley guard that is also not a true point guard.
The other moves were the 4 guys that got the least amount of minutes of any scholarship player.
The roster is vastly different. The starting lineup and minutes are almost the same.
And loosing Och would be a pretty big loss.
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Re: 21-22 lineup
i guess we just differ in the level of contribution we think is possible from the transfersCrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:31 pmBut that's what makes absolutely no sense.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:29 pmright
and i think that’s really the thing, that the bar was lowered quite a bit by this year’s team
As it stands, next year's team is just this year's team except we're trading Marcus Garrett for a Missouri Valley guard that is also not a true point guard.
The other moves were the 4 guys that got the least amount of minutes of any scholarship player.
chemistry, even with the same core 4 guys, ought to be drastically different
much has been made about Och’s numbers improving with a better point guard...does that not hold true for everyone else, and the team as a whole?
Re: 21-22 lineup
Yes, but that's an IF not a guarantee.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:34 pmi guess we just differ in the level of contribution we think is possible from the transfersCrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:31 pmBut that's what makes absolutely no sense.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:29 pm
right
and i think that’s really the thing, that the bar was lowered quite a bit by this year’s team
As it stands, next year's team is just this year's team except we're trading Marcus Garrett for a Missouri Valley guard that is also not a true point guard.
The other moves were the 4 guys that got the least amount of minutes of any scholarship player.
chemistry, even with the same core 4 guys, ought to be drastically different
much has been made about Och’s numbers improving with a better point guard...does that not hold true for everyone else, and the team as a whole?
And chemistry could go either way. And we take a step back in terms of familiarity.
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: 21-22 lineup
I certainly hope so, but we have no idea if we have a better point guard.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:34 pmi guess we just differ in the level of contribution we think is possible from the transfersCrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:31 pmBut that's what makes absolutely no sense.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:29 pm
right
and i think that’s really the thing, that the bar was lowered quite a bit by this year’s team
As it stands, next year's team is just this year's team except we're trading Marcus Garrett for a Missouri Valley guard that is also not a true point guard.
The other moves were the 4 guys that got the least amount of minutes of any scholarship player.
chemistry, even with the same core 4 guys, ought to be drastically different
much has been made about Och’s numbers improving with a better point guard...does that not hold true for everyone else, and the team as a whole?
The truth, IMO, is that the 2021 team isn't as awful as we make it out to be and the 2022 team's potential is just a little bit better than that.
I think both teams have enough where they can get a lucky matchup and some breaks and compete for a Final Four (see February 2021/Baylor). The 2021 team had about the worst luck possible. My prediction is the 2022 team looks about like the 1st or 2nd best team in the Big 12 (where 2021 finished) and either gets some lucky breaks or gets exposed by more talented more athletic teams.
Re: 21-22 lineup
My optimism is that I think next season will see a return to combo guards capable of getting their own shot + for others. I don't see this as "last year's team except we traded Marcus for a transfer" -- I see it as there's some shuffling of the roster construction that is better suited for the game today.
Or maybe I'm completely wrong and we're about to trot out a transfer PG, CB, JW, Bishop, and DM. And if so, yikes.
Or maybe I'm completely wrong and we're about to trot out a transfer PG, CB, JW, Bishop, and DM. And if so, yikes.
"So, which one of these topics are conspiracy?
1 .911 was done by Israel: okay, if you think that one is conspiracy, I'll just leave that one alone."
- lobser
1 .911 was done by Israel: okay, if you think that one is conspiracy, I'll just leave that one alone."
- lobser
- NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: 21-22 lineup
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: 21-22 lineup
I think we see the same thing, just calling it different things: half glass vs. half full.hasbeen wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:43 pmMy optimism is that I think next season will see a return to combo guards capable of getting their own shot + for others. I don't see this as "last year's team except we traded Marcus for a transfer" -- I see it as there's some shuffling of the roster construction that is better suited for the game today.
A lot is riding on Drake, and there's a lot to like about his game--we'll just see how well it translates to the new level.
And, even through possibly the roughest stretch of Bill Self Kansas basketball, this group managed to put together a 3 seed resume, finish 2nd above a team full of NBA talent in Shaka's Longhorns, and beat the best team in college basketball.
Re: 21-22 lineup
I'm really excited about our incoming players, just not so much for next season. With the exception of Martin, I think the transfers and incoming freshmen will have a much bigger impact in 2023 than 2022.
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.