Kansas Crimson

randylahey wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:18 pm

Sparko wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:15 pm Putin thought he was too stupid and daft. Tucker's handlers were embarrassed by how badly this came off. Career ender.

Ignorance is bliss I guess. Name a more popular journalist? Ill wait

"Popular" isn't the same as "good". Light beer is popular; it isn't good. McDonald's is popular; it isn't good. "Keeping up with the Kardashians" was popular; it wasn't good.

Look at all the stupid crap that Trump Humpers have made popular within their circle. None of it is good. Saying that Carlson is really popular is just a knock on his fans for liking a terrible journalist just because he says what they want to hear, not a sign that Carlson is a good journalist.

Tucky got dumped by his previous employer after being part of a defamation lawsuit that cost FOX $787M. And there were the embarrassing emails that came out as part of that document discovery.

If size of defamation settlements were the standard by which on air personalities were judged, then Tucky and Alex Jones are "the best", "the greatest".

Not sure that defamation/lies would be a positive measure of journalistic integrity for most of us. But Señor Randall and sQuirt's measures of most things are not how most of us judge success/vindication/truth.

One thing that no one will dispute, Randall and sQuirt are special.

It's not Tucker's fault that defamation lawsuits end up with these ridiculous sums that never should be. Winnings should be consistent with the person's potential earnings, which they never are. But beside that, Tucker is about 100 times more viewed than the entire mainstream media combined. It's awesome and hilarious at the same time. People always have to go elsewhere when the mainstream is fake.

This makes my head hurt. When you believe the mainstream is fake, you turn to an admitted liar for the truth?

the best is that the “mainstream” is an ever-evolving, amorphous idea for any source that lobs (or randi, or whomever) doesn’t agree with

it has zero to do with truth, fact or reality

Cassandra wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 11:16 am It's not Tucker's fault that defamation lawsuits end up with these ridiculous sums that never should be. Winnings should be consistent with the person's potential earnings, which they never are.

So put yourself in the shoes of the owner/founder of Dominion. I know that is hard to imagine from the basement of your in-laws, but try.

He had started a business and in 20 years he has built it into a $100M revenue business. Suddenly you become embroiled in a baseless conspiracy that causes you and your employees to receive death threats. You face the reality that your entire business could be worth nothing. There will be States/Counties that will break your contracts because, "they need to restore voters faith in the system" in spite of the fact that the lies have been proven to be lies over and over again. You will be losing valued employees. And a multi-billion $ corporation was amplifying these lies and knew it was spreading lies.

So what would be a reasonable settlement for them to pay to ruin a growing $100M company with a good future?

"With a good future"

Fortunately, this year there won't be any lockdowns from an intentionally released bug and forced mail in voting. Without that, hard to see any future for that "company".

repeating nonsense a million times doesn’t make it true, numbnutz

I'm just waiting for Taylor to be sworn in as president.

Cassandra wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 1:04 pm
Fortunately, this year there won't be any lockdowns from an intentionally released bug and forced mail in voting. Without that, hard to see any future for that "company".

Did you vote before 2020?

The optical scanning of ballots predates covid and will be around a long time. That is what Dominion sells.

japhy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 1:21 pm

Cassandra wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 1:04 pm
Fortunately, this year there won't be any lockdowns from an intentionally released bug and forced mail in voting. Without that, hard to see any future for that "company".

Did you vote before 2020?

The optical scanning of ballots predates covid and will be around a long time. That is what Dominion sells.

Lobster is dreaming of a USA where ALL voting is done by in person paper ballot, in 12 hours.

White folks form a line to the ballots on the right, all others use the left line, through the one way door back out to the street.

You should ask which path you're on.

And this tells us how much the Dominion settlement was inflated; not a jury verdict....a settlement, how?

if you cannot produce the proper identification. you cannot vote.

Cassandra wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 1:38 pm You should ask which path you're on.

you should take your own advice, dipshit

KUTradition wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 1:52 pm

Cassandra wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 1:38 pm You should ask which path you're on.

you should take your own advice, dipshit

This

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 1:47 pm if you cannot produce the proper identification. you cannot vote.

Did the Founding Fathers even have any form of identification, which they required in the Constitution???

Oh, wait, they were White Men. Never mind.

It is always about finding an extra way to suppress votes. Poll taxes to ID cards that they will also claim are not valid.

you guys seriously believe you shouldn't need a valid ID to vote?

zsn wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 6:45 pm

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 1:47 pm if you cannot produce the proper identification. you cannot vote.

Did the Founding Fathers even have any form of identification, which they required in the Constitution???

Oh, wait, they were White Men. Never mind.

Trying...so...hard...