Page 28 of 97
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:15 pm
by Cascadia
You just don't have the mental or emotional stability to handle these types of conversations. Trust me, there are things called science and research that dispute whatever idiotic ideas you, billy bob and dumbfuck the neighbor boy discuss at your redneck carnivals.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:16 pm
by TDub
Youre a fucking dildo.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:20 pm
by TDub
For the record Trad and I are capable of having discussions without unhinged derogatory explosions. You should try leaving your basement and getting some fresh air. Then come back and try again when youre calm.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:21 pm
by Cascadia
Calmer than you are dude.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:25 pm
by Deleted User 89
https://extension.colostate.edu/topic-a ... ase-8-006/
https://www.hcn.org/articles/wolves-can ... ng-disease
https://mountainjournal.org/predators-a ... ng-disease
the FACT is that North American megafauna evolved with wolves (and others) as the top predator. predator-prey interactions allow for the population control of both participants. wolves, cougars, coyotes, and bears do a much better job of maintaining the balance necessary to stave off infectious disease in the herd animals than humans could ever hope to through hunting
you are welcome to not want them in your backyard, but denying their natural role in the food web is just plain ignorant
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:29 pm
by TDub
Ive never argued for eradication or extinction. Idaho has done a better job at managing wolf populations than Oregon has and it has resulted in better populations and healthier populations of game animals.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:30 pm
by TDub
Also, gonna take it as a "No" that cascadia doesnt have wolves in his community, which, was the question that provoked his name calling fun.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:36 pm
by Cascadia
The proximity of wolves to my home is irrelevant to the conversation.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:37 pm
by Cascadia
Nope, sorry, jim bob, billy bob and dumbfuck the neighbor boy know better. They saw a wolf yesterday, did you?
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:41 pm
by TDub
Cascadia wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:36 pm
The proximity of wolves to my home is irrelevant to the conversation.
It speaks to your experience...which in turn impacts your world view. Relevant.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:49 pm
by Cascadia
Yep, cause my experience is defined by my current home address. God damn, you're dumb. Filling in nicely for Illy.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 6:25 pm
by TDub
Your experience with wolves impacts the discussion. Yes.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 7:19 pm
by Cascadia
My experience with wolves is not defined by my current home address. Again, god damn you're a dumb motherfucker.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 7:22 pm
by ousdahl
What’s going on here?
I just stopped by to say I got into some nice eater size Lakers today.
Po’boys and coorses tonight!
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 7:29 pm
by Cascadia
TDub's just showing off his science-denying side again. His buddies saw a wolf the other day..................
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 7:41 pm
by TDub
Youre an idiot.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 9:52 pm
by PhDhawk
Cascadia in full melt down mode.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 6:59 am
by jhawks99
Cascadia is a Baby Ruth bar in the Punch Bowl of Life.
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 7:10 am
by Leawood
Let’s do this: Google Frank Costanza and youtube and calm down
Re: The Great Outdoors
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 7:10 am
by Leawood
I want my avatar back