Page 29 of 99

Re: Royals

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:30 pm
by Sparko
Witt is roster ready at a position of need. The team is a contender I think. 2014 ish

Re: Royals

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:34 pm
by Deleted User 865
Sparko wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:30 pm Witt is roster ready at a position of need. The team is a contender I think. 2014 ish
More of 2013 feel. With younger (thus more of a variable) pitching. 2013 was a great year. Led me to watching 152 regular season games in 2014. And 160 in 2015. I'm ready.

Re: Royals

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:37 pm
by NewtonHawk11
vega wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:34 pm
Sparko wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:30 pm Witt is roster ready at a position of need. The team is a contender I think. 2014 ish
More of 2013 feel. With younger (thus more of a variable) pitching. 2013 was a great year. Led me to watching 152 regular season games in 2014. And 160 in 2015. I'm ready.
Thought exact same. This has very 2013 vibes. Team on the brink of contention.

Think just need a bit more pitching depth in rotation, but that’s coming.

Lineup is top notch.

A top 10 MLB lineup, I’d say.

Re: Royals

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:39 pm
by Deleted User 865
NewtonHawk11 wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:37 pm Lineup is top notch.

A top 10 MLB lineup, I’d say.
That's a very 2016 Royals fan thing to say.

Re: Royals

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:39 pm
by Sparko
The pen will have a say in what nostalgia we enjoy. Excited to see it.

Re: Royals

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:40 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
NewtonHawk11 wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:37 pm
vega wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:34 pm
Sparko wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:30 pm Witt is roster ready at a position of need. The team is a contender I think. 2014 ish
More of 2013 feel. With younger (thus more of a variable) pitching. 2013 was a great year. Led me to watching 152 regular season games in 2014. And 160 in 2015. I'm ready.
Thought exact same. This has very 2013 vibes. Team on the brink of contention.

Think just need a bit more pitching depth in rotation, but that’s coming.

Lineup is top notch.

A top 10 MLB lineup, I’d say.
Just want to be in a position where we are buyers. Responsible buyers.

Re: Royals

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:40 pm
by jfish26
Sparko wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:30 pm Witt is roster ready at a position of need. The team is a contender I think. 2014 ish
I hope so! But we really have no idea. They don't make golf majors out of drive, pitch and putt contests, you know?

Re: Royals

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2021 2:48 pm
by Sparko
The talent is there with maturity. Witt is a throwback player. Just hoping he is more Brett than Hurdle

Re: Royals

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2021 2:52 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
I heard a comparison to a young Barry Bonds.

As I've said for a couple years now, Kansas City is currently Mahomes drunk.

Re: Royals

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2021 11:18 pm
by jfish26
CrimsonNBlue wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 2:52 pm I heard a comparison to a young Barry Bonds.

As I've said for a couple years now, Kansas City is currently Mahomes drunk.
Let it ride!!!

Re: Royals

Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:47 am
by Sparko
We aren’t drawing into an inside straight though. We have two high card pairs and not a lot of other face cards showing on the river. All in.

Re: Royals

Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2021 2:06 pm
by Deleted User 865
Obviously a small sample size, but this has to be the first time the team has indicated they are eager to bring someone up, and 75% of the fans are begging the team to give the player more time in the minors.

Image

Re: Royals

Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2021 2:09 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
Lol. We found 154 of nicky’s family and friends.

Re: Royals

Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2021 7:54 pm
by Sparko
Yount might have had a Chris Colon trajectory with some of those folks.

Re: Royals

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 1:38 pm
by NewtonHawk11
Salvy 4 year deal. Team option. Average of 20.5M per year.

Re: Royals

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 1:42 pm
by Deleted User 865
NewtonHawk11 wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 1:38 pm Salvy 4 year deal. Team option. Average of 20.5M per year.
Yikes, why? Really high for an aging catcher. I love Salvy, and he got screwed on his earlier contract, but extending him four years at $20mm+ per seems like a bad move.

Re: Royals

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 1:56 pm
by NewtonHawk11
Basically matched Yadier Molina’s deal prior to this last deal. He was 3/60 for years 35-37 and Cards didn’t mind. Molina is a HOF obviously, but Salvy has been good when healthy.

See a lot of DH in his future when Soler leaves.

Re: Royals

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:01 pm
by Deleted User 865
Cards have more money to spend, and Yadi is a freak of nature. Salvy been having health issue and is a big guy to squat for 140 games a season. Also, don't want to be spending $20mm for a DH.

Re: Royals

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:04 pm
by Leawood
Salvy at first base.

Re: Royals

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:18 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
vega wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:01 pm Cards have more money to spend, and Yadi is a freak of nature. Salvy been having health issue and is a big guy to squat for 140 games a season. Also, don't want to be spending $20mm for a DH.
New Sheriff in town.