Page 29 of 97

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:22 am
by ousdahl
for real though who's good at cooking trout?

I don't know if it's the best fish to filet. With the second row of little tiny rib bones, I think you're better off cooking whole then picking apart.

and at least when pan frying, it's hard to get the breading to golden brown without also overcooking the meat.

I think imma try smoking them. The bears should be hibernating by now.

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:24 am
by Deleted User 89
lemon, dill and green onion

stuff the mix inside, lay lemon slices on top and throw in the grill

fantastic

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:54 am
by jhawks99
Brown butter, lemon and almonds

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:57 am
by ousdahl
frying? grilling? baking? how do you cook?

but man, that fish was so fresh that one started flopping around again when it felt the knife in the kitchen. Imagine the look on beaver's face!

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:16 am
by TDub
over coals

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 1:13 pm
by jhawks99
Full disclosure, the only trout I've cooked were pre-boned and butterflied with the head on so you're on your own cleaning them.

We sautéed them in a pan. If you're cooking whole, you could but a bunch of seasoning, lemon, onion, garlic butter/olive oil in a foil pouch and bake.

Or coals.

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 2:38 pm
by Cascadia
jhawks99 wrote: Wed Nov 18, 2020 6:59 am Cascadia is a Baby Ruth bar in the Punch Bowl of Life.
My bad.

Sorry that I value science and research over hillbilly logic from trumpers.

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 2:49 pm
by jhawks99
That wasn't my point. You can disagree without being an ass.

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:04 pm
by Cascadia
jhawks99 wrote: Wed Nov 18, 2020 2:49 pm That wasn't my point. You can disagree without being an ass.
Sorry, but science and research are not arguable

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:08 pm
by jhawks99
Maybe try this.

"Tdub, I realize you have strong opinions on this but I disagree. The science I have read says..."

Not that tough.

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:22 pm
by Cascadia
No thanks, that just continues to enable people to think of science as a matter of opinion instead of a matter of fact.

And honestly, this has been one of the biggest impacts of the Trump presidency, trumpers think if they say something it makes that statement a fact. Sorry, but that shit has no place in a developed society. Science deniers (especially the trumpers) can fuck right off. Either learn and evolve or get the fuck out.

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:24 pm
by Cascadia
And I’ll also point out that I only take an aggressive tone against Illy, Lobster and TDub (3 trumpers) and gutter ( verified psychopath)

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:24 pm
by TDub
I think you should try doing some more reading and perhaps spend some time where wolf activity impacts people and people's families and livelihoods before you go off fucking this and fucking that.

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:25 pm
by TDub
and once again, im not a trumper.

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:29 pm
by TDub
There are nuances that cant be grasped from an article. Not that you would ever take the time to actually understand that but, worth the fdoet to mention it. Science and real worls experience and application are the best path.

In my industry architects and engineers believe if they can draw it then it must work. The best architects and engineers spent time working in the field before designing. They better understand the real life scenarios that impact their design.

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:16 pm
by ousdahl

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:50 pm
by TDub
Same thing here but its pikeminnow

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2020 9:39 pm
by TDub
https://www.oregonlive.com/wildfires/20 ... -west.html

I understand this is controversial and...we ought to tread lightly. But, something should be done at some point...the natives controlled vegetation through purposeful burns and other similar methods and had success.

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:03 am
by ousdahl
Damn. I had no fewer than 3 deer come no further than 3 feet from the front end of my truck tonight. Like, oh shit there’s another deer again better lock it up again. One was a trophy buck.

I suppose deer this time or year are dumb cuz they’re rutting or whatever. Oh boo hoo. I’m thinking about sex too, but I can at least do it without getting hit by a car. Usually.

Re: The Great Outdoors

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:30 am
by defixione
Sunday morning my wife and I headed to breakfast in Monte Vista around 7:30. There was no traffic and about a block from the center of town, 30 yards in front of us, we saw a buck deer (elk?) casually saunter across highway 285 like it was heading home from partying all night. I don't know how the rack point system works but this one had a huge tree growing out of his head.