Page 30 of 78
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:56 pm
by JKLivin
Shirley wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:05 pm
twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:42 pm
JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:31 pm
You do realize that Harris has an IQ in the 70’s, right? If it weren’t for her other, um, skills, she’d be a shift manager at Popeye’s.
Anyone who thinks Harris is dumber than Trump needs to have their head examined. If that moron can be President then there is no intelligence required for the job.
Other than Noosh long ago, I can't recall ever putting anyone on "Ignore" here or at .com, et al.
So, it feels very odd to have the idea occur to me so often recently.
And for the record, I've been almost universally against anyone ever being "banned".
You should do it, then. It won’t impact my experience on the boreds whatsoever, and it sounds like you’ll feel better.
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:58 pm
by JKLivin
Sparko wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:36 pm
JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:31 pm
jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:21 pm
It's rich taking qualification and capability advice from those who would, if given the binary choice, absolutely choose someone who fundamentally does not believe that the Constitution, or the laws that flow from it, apply to him.
You do realize that Harris has an IQ in the 70’s, right? If it weren’t for her other, um, skills, she’d be a shift manager at Popeye’s.
It turns out our VP is a brilliant person. But dog whistles are your thing
Ah, “brilliant” as in laughing obnoxiously at the 9/11 memorial service? “Brilliant” as in braying every time she’s asked a question about the economy or gas prices or inflation? Gosh, I guess I need to rethink all my years of training and education with regard to intelligence. My bad.
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:59 pm
by JKLivin
twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:42 pm
JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:31 pm
jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:21 pm
It's rich taking qualification and capability advice from those who would, if given the binary choice, absolutely choose someone who fundamentally does not believe that the Constitution, or the laws that flow from it, apply to him.
You do realize that Harris has an IQ in the 70’s, right? If it weren’t for her other, um, skills, she’d be a shift manager at Popeye’s.
Anyone who thinks Harris is dumber than Trump needs to have their head examined. If that moron can be President then there is no intelligence required for the job.
Lulz.
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:00 pm
by DCHawk1
Shirley wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:39 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 11:45 am
mjl2 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 11:38 am
Is military spending policy switching parties?
Kinda.
Neither party really stands for much of anything coherent.
^^^
The
tell was when neither party bothered with composing a platform to run on in 2020:
8.25/2020 The GOP will not roll out a new party platform ahead of the 2020 presidential race, instead opting to declare fealty to President Trump’s agenda. So, what does the Republican Party stand for now?
"..."I can't remember a time in my life, and Frank (Luntz) said the same thing, that you just struggled so manifestly to come up with any sort of a coherent definition or description for a party..."
8/24/2020: The Republican Party says it will not be announcing a new platform of policies to voters at this year's Republican National Convention but will instead pledge to "enthusiastically" support President Donald Trump.
____________________________________________________________________________
Oh, wait:
9/19/2020 Democrats on Tuesday night officially approved a new party platform, outlining a sweeping set of policies on key issues including health care, climate change and the economy.
...The platform was written by a drafting committee that included members from the party’s progressive and more moderate wings. The Democratic National Committee’s platform committee then voted on the platform before sending it to all of the delegates who voted remotely on whether to approve it...
Edwin Starr has thoughts on your platform.
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:06 pm
by JKLivin
twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:42 pm
JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:31 pm
jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:21 pm
It's rich taking qualification and capability advice from those who would, if given the binary choice, absolutely choose someone who fundamentally does not believe that the Constitution, or the laws that flow from it, apply to him.
You do realize that Harris has an IQ in the 70’s, right? If it weren’t for her other, um, skills, she’d be a shift manager at Popeye’s.
Anyone who thinks Harris is dumber than Trump needs to have their head examined. If that moron can be President then there is no intelligence required for the job.
https://nypost.com/2023/07/12/vp-kamala ... thing/amp/
“I think the first part of this issue that should be articulated is AI is kind of a fancy thing,” Harris, 58, said during a roundtable event at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington. “First of all, it’s two letters. It means artificial intelligence, but ultimately what it is, is it’s about machine learning.”
I stand corrected. Brilliant.
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:22 pm
by KUTradition
#misogynyisfun
#fauxhumor
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:26 pm
by JKLivin
KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:22 pm
#misogynyisfun
#fauxhumor
Lol.
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:26 pm
by Overlander
JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:58 pm
Sparko wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:36 pm
JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:31 pm
You do realize that Harris has an IQ in the 70’s, right? If it weren’t for her other, um, skills, she’d be a shift manager at Popeye’s.
It turns out our VP is a brilliant person. But dog whistles are your thing
Gosh, I guess I need to rethink all my years of training and education with regard to intelligence. My bad.
Wait, how does your training as a Kung Fu Master give you intellectual high ground?
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:10 pm
by randylahey
The criteria necessary for being vice president in this administration: must be black woman. They literally said that. Because identity politics is the democrats favorite thing to do
And yes they literally said that was what they were looking for. No kamala Harris isn't a particularly bright politician. But she fit the criteria
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:29 pm
by Shirley
randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:10 pm
The criteria necessary for being vice president in this administration: must be black woman. They literally said that. Because identity politics is the democrats favorite thing to do
And yes they literally said that was what they were looking for. No kamala Harris isn't a particularly bright politician. But she fit the criteria
By "they" do you mean Joe Biden, who gets to pick his vice presidential running mate because
he won the presidential nomination?
What is so complicated about that, dumbass?
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:34 pm
by randylahey
Shirley wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:29 pm
randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:10 pm
The criteria necessary for being vice president in this administration: must be black woman. They literally said that. Because identity politics is the democrats favorite thing to do
And yes they literally said that was what they were looking for. No kamala Harris isn't a particularly bright politician. But she fit the criteria
By "they" do you mean Joe Biden, who gets to pick his vice presidential running mate because
he won the presidential nomination?
What is so complicated about that, dumbass?
Joe biden and his handlers. Instead of considering a whole field of possible candidates, his vp pick came from a narrow group that fit his identity politics game. Had to be a black woman. Before he chose kamala, biden literally said his vp would be a black woman
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:38 pm
by Shirley
randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:34 pm
Shirley wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:29 pm
randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:10 pm
The criteria necessary for being vice president in this administration: must be black woman. They literally said that. Because identity politics is the democrats favorite thing to do
And yes they literally said that was what they were looking for. No kamala Harris isn't a particularly bright politician. But she fit the criteria
By "they" do you mean Joe Biden, who gets to pick his vice presidential running mate because
he won the presidential nomination?
What is so complicated about that, dumbass?
Joe biden and his handlers. Instead of considering a whole field of possible candidates, his vp pick came from a narrow group that fit his identity politics game. Had to be a black woman. Before he chose kamala, biden literally said his vp would be a black woman
And, so what?
Do you think he didn't have anyone in mind before he said he would?
Stop projecting, not everyone is as dense as you.
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:42 pm
by randylahey
I think his list of candidates was created for bullshit optics. Because it was. He was exclusively looking for a minority woman to be his vp. People should not be appointed because of identity politics. People should be appointed based on merit
Everyone should be familiar with the bullshit identity politics game the democrats continually play
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:49 pm
by Shirley
randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:42 pm
I think his list of candidates was created for bullshit optics. Because it was. He was exclusively looking for a minority woman to be his vp. People should not be appointed because of identity politics. People should be appointed based on merit
Everyone should be familiar with the bullshit identity politics game the democrats continually play
Would you care to make the argument that Trump picked Mike Pence because they have so much in common?
He was picked to quell the fears of the Christo-Fascists, I mean, "conservative" Christians.
As per usual, you have no fucking idea what you're talking about:
identity politics: a tendency for people of a particular religion, ethnic group, social background, etc., to form exclusive political alliances, moving away from traditional broad-based party politics.
smfh
Your ignorance gets really boring randy.
really boring
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:23 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns
JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:58 pm
Sparko wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:36 pm
JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:31 pm
You do realize that Harris has an IQ in the 70’s, right? If it weren’t for her other, um, skills, she’d be a shift manager at Popeye’s.
It turns out our VP is a brilliant person. But dog whistles are your thing
Ah, “brilliant” as in laughing obnoxiously at the 9/11 memorial service? “Brilliant” as in braying every time she’s asked a question about the economy or gas prices or inflation? Gosh, I guess I need to rethink all my years of training and education with regard to intelligence. My bad.
Not a bad idea for you to rethink all your years of training and education with regard to you intelligence.
You really KNOW Harris has a an IQ in the 70s?
I'll bet my $1000 vs. your $100 that Harris has an IQ that is higher than your's.
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:37 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns
randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:10 pm
The criteria necessary for being vice president in this administration: must be black woman. They literally said that. Because identity politics is the democrats favorite thing to do
And yes they literally said that was what they were looking for. No kamala Harris isn't a particularly bright politician. But she fit the criteria
Who is "they" and when did "they" "literally" say that?
Also, I MIGHT agree with you that Harris isn't a particularly bright politician but compared to politicians you are familiar with such as Loren Boebert, Matt Gaetz, MTG, Paul Gosar, and George Santos, Harris should probably be considered an extremely bright politician. Heck, compared to you she's probably a rocket scientist.
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:28 am
by JKLivin
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:23 am
JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:58 pm
Sparko wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:36 pm
It turns out our VP is a brilliant person. But dog whistles are your thing
Ah, “brilliant” as in laughing obnoxiously at the 9/11 memorial service? “Brilliant” as in braying every time she’s asked a question about the economy or gas prices or inflation? Gosh, I guess I need to rethink all my years of training and education with regard to intelligence. My bad.
Not a bad idea for you to rethink all your years of training and education with regard to you intelligence.
You really KNOW Harris has a an IQ in the 70s?
I'll bet my $1000 vs. your $100 that Harris has an IQ that is higher than your's.
I’d take that bet. She’s an inarticulate imbecile.
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 5:48 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns
JKLivin wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:28 am
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:23 am
JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 5:58 pm
Ah, “brilliant” as in laughing obnoxiously at the 9/11 memorial service? “Brilliant” as in braying every time she’s asked a question about the economy or gas prices or inflation? Gosh, I guess I need to rethink all my years of training and education with regard to intelligence. My bad.
Not a bad idea for you to rethink all your years of training and education with regard to you intelligence.
You really KNOW Harris has a an IQ in the 70s?
I'll bet my $1000 vs. your $100 that Harris has an IQ that is higher than your's.
I’d take that bet. She’s an inarticulate imbecile.
Great! We have a bet. Now how are we going to prove and settle it?
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:28 am
by KUTradition
a) VP
b) complains about having to adjunct too much to pay the bills
i know who my money is on
(and i’m not a fan of KH at all)
Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:36 am
by JKLivin
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 5:48 am
JKLivin wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:28 am
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:23 am
Not a bad idea for you to rethink all your years of training and education with regard to you intelligence.
You really KNOW Harris has a an IQ in the 70s?
I'll bet my $1000 vs. your $100 that Harris has an IQ that is higher than your's.
I’d take that bet. She’s an inarticulate imbecile.
Great! We have a bet. Now how are we going to prove and settle it?
I know what my IQ is. I have heard Kamala talk enough to be certain hers is well below that number. That's all I need.