...Citing two sources at the Post with knowledge of internal matters, NPR’s David Folkenflik reported Monday that the newspaper had lost about 8% of its paid circulation of 2.5 million subscribers, which includes print editions, since Friday’s announcement of the non-endorsement...
You sure showed them! They'll be eating cat food and living in cardboard boxes in no time!
Re: 2024
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:00 pm
by Shirley
Well, ouch!
This was played tonight during Monday Night Football:
Re: 2024
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:35 pm
by JKLivin
Shirley wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:00 pm
Well, ouch!
This was played tonight during Monday Night Football:
Random supposed "Stillers" fan and union worker who's man enough to vote for a woman!
Shirley wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:00 pm
Well, ouch!
This was played tonight during Monday Night Football:
Random supposed "Stillers" fan and union worker who's man enough to vote for a woman!
Sick burn.
That sound you heard was the point zooming over your head.
By all means, please enlighten me.
Re: 2024
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 7:20 am
by KUTradition
so you can ignore and continue your crusade of willful ignorance?
do better
Re: 2024
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:01 am
by randylahey
Georgia democrats are suing to prevent drop box surveillance???
Now why on earth would there be a good reason to do this
Re: 2024
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:03 am
by KUTradition
your surveillance is their intimidation
Utah drop boxes are under camera surveillance and it works just fine
Re: 2024
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:39 am
by randylahey
Having a camera up to make sure nobody pampers with drop boxes seems like a good thing for everyone right? Now on why on earth would democrats sue to stop this
Re: 2024
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:45 am
by KUTradition
i don’t know…maybe post the story, not in someone’s hot-take tweet, and we can discuss it
as of now, this just seems like your typical manufactured outrage over something for which you lack complete understanding
Re: 2024
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:59 am
by Back2Lawrence
If Trump wins, there is a 0% chance of election interference.
If Trump loses, there is 100% chance of election interference.
The drum on this has been beating for about a decade.
Re: 2024
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:02 am
by KUTradition
a quick google search doesn’t find any such lawsuit, randi
(there are lawsuits regarding mandatory hand-counting of ballots)
Re: 2024
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:09 am
by JKLivin
randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:39 am
Having a camera up to make sure nobody pampers with drop boxes seems like a good thing for everyone right? Now on why on earth would democrats sue to stop this
But that makes it unduly difficult to steal the election again. Meanie!
Re: 2024
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:18 am
by KUTradition
KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:02 am
a quick google search doesn’t find any such lawsuit, randi
(there are lawsuits regarding mandatory hand-counting of ballots)
Re: 2024
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:25 am
by KUTradition
still looking for that lawsuit…
Re: 2024
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 11:08 am
by jfish26
Even a primary source that describes what specifically was proposed would help.
For example, a camera monitored by law enforcement and subject to FOIA requests is one thing.
A camera linked with facial recognition software that is monitored by a political body and shielded from public review is quite another.
Even though they are both cameras.
Re: 2024
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 11:33 am
by japhy
jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 11:08 am
Even a primary source that describes what specifically was proposed would help.
For example, a camera monitored by law enforcement and subject to FOIA requests is one thing.
A camera linked with facial recognition software that is monitored by a political body and shielded from public review is quite another.
Even though they are both cameras.
"WE THE RUBE PEOPLE" want this!
Until we find out how it gets turned against us, and then it will be UNFAIR!
Re: 2024
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 11:48 am
by twocoach
randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:01 am
Georgia democrats are suing to prevent drop box surveillance???
Now why on earth would there be a good reason to do this
Nope, not what happened at all. As per usual with you and JK.
Democrats sued last month to prevent a number of last minute rule changes from being enacted this late in the process. The Fulton County Board agreed that the changes were unconstitutional and ruled that they be set aside. Republicans countered by asking the GA Supreme Court to hear the case in an expedited manner but the GA Supreme Court just ruled that they will not hear the expedited case this close to the election.
Just a reminder that Republicans on this site had HUGE PROBLEMS with last minute rule changes to the point where some of you insisted that it invalidated the results of the election. So why are you OK with it now?!?
"In the latest battle over Georgia’s election laws and procedures, the Georgia Supreme Court declined to expedite a Republican appeal aimed at reinstating seven last-minute rules passed by Georgia’s State Election Board ahead of the Nov. 5 general election.
If enacted, the rules would have made it easier for local election officials to delay certifying election results, required hand-counting of all ballots on election day, expanded mandatory poll-watching areas and mandated video surveillance of ballot drop boxes, among other changes. Voting rights groups and election officials alike opposed the rules, arguing that last-minute changes could sow confusion and doubt into the elections process, and that implementing the changes would violate Georgia’s election laws."
