Kansas Crimson

DrPepper wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 8:36 am Is this supposed to be a joke? If you had paid attention to this story, you’d know the tipping point reason why she and her husband went to therapy was because she was insisting on having two front doors on her house. You see, since being sexually assaulted when she was 15 and having that trauma of not being able to escape for a while, she has a phobia of feeling enclosed. So she likes lots of doors.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:09 am It is not surprising that things got left off as "he-said, she-said." It is only slightly less surprising that people are still suggesting that due process and the accuser having a burden of proof matter here, at all.

Geezer wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 8:47 am Psych's misogyny on display.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:34 am I get what yer sayin'.

I remember that time when I was accused -- repeatedly on national TV -- of being the leader of a secret gang-rape ring. I just kinda blew it off. NBD.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:50 amdidn't you operate out of a pizza joint?

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:45 am

Geezer wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 8:47 am Psych's misogyny on display.

Social and evolutionary psychology would both back my assertion. I just calls it like I sees it.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:37 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:09 am It is not surprising that things got left off as "he-said, she-said." It is only slightly less surprising that people are still suggesting that due process and the accuser having a burden of proof matter here, at all.

Insisting on no burden of proof whatsoever leads to this kind of dipshittery.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:59 am

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:37 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:09 am It is not surprising that things got left off as "he-said, she-said." It is only slightly less surprising that people are still suggesting that due process and the accuser having a burden of proof matter here, at all.

Insisting on no burden of proof whatsoever leads to this kind of dipshittery.

I think there is a standard implicit in a confirmation proceeding (given the Senate's "advise and consent" role): it is the nominee's burden to persuade the Senate that the Senate should consent to the appointment. In my view, Kavanaugh's very, very clear partisan-ness and lack of candor render him presently unworthy of the Senate's consent.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:53 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:50 amdidn't you operate out of a pizza joint?

And that's the relevant question. The pizza-gate story was treated for what it was -- complete lunacy.

The sex-ring story -- just as insane and just as dangerous -- was treated as legitimate news. Moreover, y'all are gonna nominate the guy for president.

Oh. And Fish thinks it's Kavanaugh's responsibility to prove he didn't run the rape gang.

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:02 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:59 am

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:37 am

Insisting on no burden of proof whatsoever leads to this kind of dipshittery.

I think there is a standard implicit in a confirmation proceeding (given the Senate's "advise and consent" role): it is the nominee's burden to persuade the Senate that the Senate should consent to the appointment. In my view, Kavanaugh's very, very clear partisan-ness and lack of candor render him presently unworthy of the Senate's consent.

Can you prove you didn’t rape her?

Monster!

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:53 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:50 amdidn't you operate out of a pizza joint?

And that's the relevant question. The pizza-gate story was treated for what it was -- complete lunacy.

The sex-ring story -- just as insane and just as dangerous -- was treated as legitimate news. Moreover, y'all are gonna nominate the guy for president.

Oh. And Fish thinks it's Kavanaugh's responsibility to prove he didn't run the rape gang.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:06 am

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:53 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:50 amdidn't you operate out of a pizza joint?

And that's the relevant question. The pizza-gate story was treated for what it was -- complete lunacy.

The sex-ring story -- just as insane and just as dangerous -- was treated as legitimate news. Moreover, y'all are gonna nominate the guy for president.

Oh. And Fish thinks it's Kavanaugh's responsibility to prove he didn't run the rape gang.

whoa, did you just equate Kavanaugh's accusers to pizzagate?

jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:11 am

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:53 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:50 amdidn't you operate out of a pizza joint?

And that's the relevant question. The pizza-gate story was treated for what it was -- complete lunacy.

The sex-ring story -- just as insane and just as dangerous -- was treated as legitimate news. Moreover, y'all are gonna nominate the guy for president.

Oh. And Fish thinks it's Kavanaugh's responsibility to prove he didn't run the rape gang.

If you want to disagree with me, fine and it's interesting to discuss/debate, but you're above completely misrepresenting my very clear and consistent position so that you can deploy ready-made talking points.