Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 6:30 pm
Jimmy Carter?
Page 4 of 6
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 6:57 pm
Pretty sure he said he lusted in his heart.
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 7:26 pm
wtf is wrong with some people?
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:37 pm
Some people have a sense of humor; others just take everything posted literally.
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 10:20 pm
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:37 pmSome people have a sense of humor; others just take everything posted literally.
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 4:45 am
referring to the former first lady as a tranny isn’t funny, unless you’re a) racist, b) mysogonist, or c) bothHouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:37 pmSome people have a sense of humor; others just take everything posted literally.
edit: but then, i’d imagine you know this
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 5:10 am
has nobody told drumpf that the saudis can’t really just switch to buying weapons from china or russia?
from everything i’ve read/heard, it would seem that the different systems don’t communicate with one another, and so for the saudis to make change it would require nearly a ground-up rebuild of their military since they’ve already invested in US systems
i don’t see how the saudis have any real leverage in this Kashoggi situation
from everything i’ve read/heard, it would seem that the different systems don’t communicate with one another, and so for the saudis to make change it would require nearly a ground-up rebuild of their military since they’ve already invested in US systems
i don’t see how the saudis have any real leverage in this Kashoggi situation
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 6:34 am
Tranny has nothing to do with race. Surely you knew that already, though.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 4:45 amreferring to the former first lady as a tranny isn’t funny, unless you’re a) racist, b) mysogonist, or c) bothHouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:37 pmSome people have a sense of humor; others just take everything posted literally.
edit: but then, i’d imagine you know this
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 6:55 am
That the former First Lady is an American with degrees from Ivies, including a Harvard Law degree, and the current First Lady didn't go to college, but was a porn model who probably had some illegalities in her citizenship app, and has brought in her family, gives an indication of which letter(s) might be correct, tradition.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 4:45 amreferring to the former first lady as a tranny isn’t funny, unless you’re a) racist, b) mysogonist, or c) bothHouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:37 pmSome people have a sense of humor; others just take everything posted literally.
edit: but then, i’d imagine you know this
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 8:41 am
Depends, are you planning to build gold plated hotels in The Kingdom?TraditionKU wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 5:10 am
i don’t see how the saudis have any real leverage in this Kashoggi situation
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:10 pm
Good grief. I had you multiple rungs above the likes of IMZCount but then you went and posted this nonsense. I assume you don't actually believe this is true and just like to see "libtards" spazz out, but do you feel even a little hesitant about spreading such foolish nonsense knowing that someone like IMZCount will read it and spread it to another site as something he heard and really believes? It's nonsense like this that piles up and leads to pipe bombs being sent and pizza parlors being stormed.HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 5:25 pmWord is that is was a dude (not his tranny wife) so it was kept more hush-hush than usual.
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:14 pm
Sometimes initial impressions are incorrect.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:10 pmGood grief. I had you multiple rungs above the likes of IMZCount but then you went and posted this nonsense. I assume you don't actually believe this is true and just like to see "libtards" spazz out, but do you feel even a little hesitant about spreading such foolish nonsense knowing that someone like IMZCount will read it and spread it to another site as something he heard and really believes? It's nonsense like this that piles up and leads to pipe bombs being sent and pizza parlors being stormed.HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 5:25 pmWord is that is was a dude (not his tranny wife) so it was kept more hush-hush than usual.
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:40 pm
If nothing else, it gets people like you to admit out loud how morally, intellectually, and intrinsically superior you believe yourself to be to the slack-jawed troglodytes who voted the POTUS into power.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:10 pmGood grief. I had you multiple rungs above the likes of IMZCount but then you went and posted this nonsense. I assume you don't actually believe this is true and just like to see "libtards" spazz out, but do you feel even a little hesitant about spreading such foolish nonsense knowing that someone like IMZCount will read it and spread it to another site as something he heard and really believes? It's nonsense like this that piles up and leads to pipe bombs being sent and pizza parlors being stormed.HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 5:25 pmWord is that is was a dude (not his tranny wife) so it was kept more hush-hush than usual.
Then you wonder why the two sides can’t find any common ground.
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:44 pm
Try finding common ground with a slack-jawed troglodyte sometime.
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:46 pm
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:49 pm
It's not that. When your tin foil hat has its antenna enacted, it's difficult to talk when you're getting messages about how the world would have been better off had DOWDY would had blown to smithereens.
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:54 pm
I’m sorry your antenna is having trouble enacting. That is heartbreaking for men of every age. The good news is that there are pills that will fix it right up.
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:55 pm
Tin foil hat.
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 7:05 am
Some voted R because of the Supreme Court, gun rights and/or abortion. Others vote R because they support what the GOP used to be when it was the party of fiscal responsibility and the voice of limited government intervention in our life. Shit, if the GOP was still actually that I'd probably vote R from time to time if you modernized your social platform from it's current 1950s model. I only feel that a small subsection of the folks that voted for Trump are that. Just as I believe that a portion of the folks that vote D are folks that I do not personally support in a broader sense.HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:40 pmIf nothing else, it gets people like you to admit out loud how morally, intellectually, and intrinsically superior you believe yourself to be to the slack-jawed troglodytes who voted the POTUS into power.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:10 pmGood grief. I had you multiple rungs above the likes of IMZCount but then you went and posted this nonsense. I assume you don't actually believe this is true and just like to see "libtards" spazz out, but do you feel even a little hesitant about spreading such foolish nonsense knowing that someone like IMZCount will read it and spread it to another site as something he heard and really believes? It's nonsense like this that piles up and leads to pipe bombs being sent and pizza parlors being stormed.HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Oct 23, 2018 5:25 pm
Word is that is was a dude (not his tranny wife) so it was kept more hush-hush than usual.
Then you wonder why the two sides can’t find any common ground.
Your comment accomplishes absolutely nothing stated. Lying about the other side and then complaining that it's the other side that is responsible for not finding common grounds is the pinnacle of absurd hypocrisy.
Re: Coherent Policy?
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 9:53 am
Look at the statement you made that I was responding to and then ask yourself where I got the ideas I made in my post. Those attitudes are oozing out of your pores every time you post. I’m not the liar or the hypocrite here.twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Oct 25, 2018 7:05 amSome voted R because of the Supreme Court, gun rights and/or abortion. Others vote R because they support what the GOP used to be when it was the party of fiscal responsibility and the voice of limited government intervention in our life. Shit, if the GOP was still actually that I'd probably vote R from time to time if you modernized your social platform from it's current 1950s model. I only feel that a small subsection of the folks that voted for Trump are that. Just as I believe that a portion of the folks that vote D are folks that I do not personally support in a broader sense.HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:40 pmIf nothing else, it gets people like you to admit out loud how morally, intellectually, and intrinsically superior you believe yourself to be to the slack-jawed troglodytes who voted the POTUS into power.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:10 pm
Good grief. I had you multiple rungs above the likes of IMZCount but then you went and posted this nonsense. I assume you don't actually believe this is true and just like to see "libtards" spazz out, but do you feel even a little hesitant about spreading such foolish nonsense knowing that someone like IMZCount will read it and spread it to another site as something he heard and really believes? It's nonsense like this that piles up and leads to pipe bombs being sent and pizza parlors being stormed.
Then you wonder why the two sides can’t find any common ground.
Your comment accomplishes absolutely nothing stated. Lying about the other side and then complaining that it's the other side that is responsible for not finding common grounds is the pinnacle of absurd hypocrisy.