Kansas Crimson

I didn't know that Gabbard already has access to the report. She's beat everyone to it by two or three weeks. Couple of things: "knowingly", no exoneration. What do those mean?

Little chance of conviction is different than exoneration.
What happened to Roger Stone? If there was any illegal conduct with the Russians, he was the logical one.

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 2:30 pm Little chance of conviction is different than exoneration.
What happened to Roger Stone? If there was any illegal conduct with the Russians, he was the logical one.

He'll be pardoned by Trump along with Flynn, and Papadopoulos. Framed by the FBI.

FBI doesn't exactly have a history of framing anybody.

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 2:55 pm FBI doesn't exactly have a history of framing anybody.

I don't trust any law enforcement.

Good to know you never voted for Joe Arpaio.

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 2:55 pm FBI doesn't exactly have a history of framing anybody.

Ho. Lee. Phuq.

You became a Tool of The man so slowly, I hardly noticed.








Wait. That's not true. Everyone noticed.

Now, as hasbeen might say:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/81973851-157.html

defixione wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 3:14 pm Good to know you never voted for Joe Arpaio.

Right, I didn't vote for him, because I don't live in Phoenix.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 5:34 pm

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 2:55 pm FBI doesn't exactly have a history of framing anybody.

Ho. Lee. Phuq.

You became a Tool of The man so slowly, I hardly noticed.








Wait. That's not true. Everyone noticed.

Now, as hasbeen might say:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/81973851-157.html

Went back to J.Edgar?

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 7:46 pm

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 5:34 pm

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 2:55 pm FBI doesn't exactly have a history of framing anybody.

Ho. Lee. Phuq.

You became a Tool of The man so slowly, I hardly noticed.







Wait. That's not true. Everyone noticed.

Now, as hasbeen might say:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/81973851-157.html

Went back to J.Edgar?

It seems desperate until you take into consideration how badly DC pines for the era when the "Fiscal Responsibility Party" actually balanced a federal budget.

Feral wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 8:02 pm

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 7:46 pm

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 5:34 pm

Ho. Lee. Phuq.

You became a Tool of The man so slowly, I hardly noticed.







Wait. That's not true. Everyone noticed.

Now, as hasbeen might say:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/81973851-157.html

Went back to J.Edgar?

It seems desperate until you take into consideration how badly DC pines for the era when the "Fiscal Responsibility Party" actually balanced a federal budget.

Coolidge???

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 7:46 pm

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 5:34 pm

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 2:55 pm FBI doesn't exactly have a history of framing anybody.

Ho. Lee. Phuq.

You became a Tool of The man so slowly, I hardly noticed.








Wait. That's not true. Everyone noticed.

Now, as hasbeen might say:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/81973851-157.html

Went back to J.Edgar?

Just making the point that the FBI has a rather unpleasant history.

But, as I said, you are The Man's tool now.

Young Geezer would be so ashamed.

If Stone goes down in all of this....success.

dolomite wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 3:00 pm

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 2:55 pm FBI doesn't exactly have a history of framing anybody.

I don't trust any law enforcement.

Unless they say that Trump did nothing wrong. Then they're trustworthy, right?

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 5:34 pm

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 2:55 pm FBI doesn't exactly have a history of framing anybody.

Ho. Lee. Phuq.

You became a Tool of The man so slowly, I hardly noticed.

Wait. That's not true. Everyone noticed.

Now, as hasbeen might say:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/81973851-157.html

"Has happened in the 110 year history of" is not the same as "a history of" and I think you know that.

That's what's known as an "example."

It's hardly exhaustive.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 31, 2019 10:04 am That's what's known as an "example."

It's hardly exhaustive.

And it hardly displays "a history of" anything. It's a Trumpian attempt to nullify someone's post. Throw one counter out there and "welp, that's proves it is a lie. On to the next muddying of the waters." without addressing the core point.

Wut are you babbling about?

Geezer's implication was the the FBI is beyond reproach. It's not. I merely chose one prominent example to illustrate the point.

You need to take a deep breath.

Just take the L and move on.

lulz



https://thinkprogress.org/trump-needs-f ... 5dd7f2ca4/

https://www.aclu.org/other/more-about-fbi-spying

https://www.aclu.org/other/unleashed-an ... -authority

These are just a handful of LEFT-leaning sources, you know, people who, unlike you, haven't sold out their principles to get OMB.